Cases

SUMMARY ORDER Appellant Santos Morales, pro se, filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1988 complaint against two state prosecutors, Steven Weiss and Mitchell Rubin. Morales asserted that after his arrest for felony possession of a firearm, defendants refused to contact witnesses on his behalf and asked Immigration and Customs Enforcement (“ICE”) to place a detainer on him after he filed a bond motion. Morales was placed in immigra

OPINION SWEET, District Judge. The defendants, Donna Karan Weiss (“Karan”) and Urban Zen, LLC (“Urban Zen”) (collectively, the “Karan Defen*683dants”), and the defendant Stephen M. Robbins (“Robbins”) (collectively with the Karan Defendants, the “Defendants”), have moved pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to dismiss t

OPINION SWEET, District Judge. Defendants Donna Karan Weiss (“Karan”) and Urban Zen, LLC (“Urban Zen”) (collectively, the “Karan Defendants”) have filed a motion, pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), to dismiss the Amended Complaint (the “Amended Complaint”) filed by Plaintiff Jamie A. Naughright (“Naughright” or the “Plaintiff’). Defendant Stephen M. Robbins (“Robbins” and, collectively with the Karan Defendant

OPINION HARDIMAN, Circuit Judge. At issue in this appeal is whether Pennsylvania inmates have a constitutionally protected liberty interest in the expectation of release to a community correctional center. We hold they do not.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: In these consolidated cases, 'Marie Therese Assa’ad-Faltas appeals the district court’s orders accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendations to dismiss her claims after a 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (2012) review. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Acco

235 S.W.3d 891 (2006) Rholan NELSON, Appellant, v. Dr. John B. WEISS and John Does Nos. 1-5, Appellees. No. 05-1079. Supreme Court of Arkansas. May 18, 2006. Rehearing Denied June 22, 2006. *892 Law Offices of Charles Karr, P.A., by: Charles Karr, Fort Smith, AR, for appellant. Cox, Cox & Estes, PLLC,

Royce C. Lamberth, United States District Judge Pursuant to an agreement with the Indonesian government, Exxon Mobil Corporation, a United States corporation, and several of its wholly owned subsidiaries (hereinafter Exxon) operated a large natural gas extraction and processing facility in the Aceh Province of Indonesia. Plaintiffs are Indonesian citizens who claim that Exxon's security forces engaged in extrajudicial

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT DIOCESE OF VENICE IN FLORIDA, INC; ) DIOCESE OF VENICE IN FLORIDA, a ) corporate sole; BISHOP DEWANE, ) as corporate sole

URSULA UNGARO, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon Defendant Javier J. Romaguera ("Sgt. Romaguera")'s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (the "Motion") (D.E. 65). THE COURT has reviewed the Motion and pertinent parts of the record and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. For the reasons explained below, the Motion is granted as to the sole federal claim, and the

415 F.Supp.2d 720 (2005) Philip C. WEISS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. FUJISAWA PHARMACEUTICAL CO., et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A.5:05-527JMH. United States District Court, E.D. Kentucky, Lexington. December 28, 2005. *721 H. Philip Grossman, Fernandez, Friedman, Grossman & Kohn, Jennifer A. Moore, Fernandez, Friedman, Grossman &am;

OPINION OF THE COURT Lawrence Knipel, J. In this action brought to recover damages the court is confronted with an issue of first impression, namely whether the one-year-and-90-day statute of limitations contained in section 7401 of McKinney’s Unconsolidated Laws of NY (New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation Act § 20, as added by L 1969, ch 1016, § 1, as amended) or the three-year statute of CPLR 214

[Cite as State ex rel. Weiss v. Murphy, 2026-Ohio-2616.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA STATE EX REL. ERIC WEISS, : Relator, : No. 116589 v. : THE HON. MOLLIE

[Cite as State ex rel. Weiss v. Murphy, 2026-Ohio-2617.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA STATE EX REL. ERIC WEISS, : Relator, : No. 116590 v. : THE HON. MOLLIE

[Cite as State v. Weiss, 2025-Ohio-277.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 113962 v. : ERIC WEISS, :

OPINION OF THE COURT RENDELL, Circuit Judge. Richard Weiss brought suit under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”), Pub.L. 91-452, 84 Stat. 941, as amended, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961— 1968, against his insurer, First Unum Life Insurance Co. (“First Unum”), claiming *25

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed February 3, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D20-843 Lower Tribunal No. 14-11578 ________________ Caroline Weiss, Appellant,

69 F.Supp.2d 335 (1999) Dean Junior WEBB, Petitioner/Plaintiff, v. John WEISS, Officer in Charge, Immigration and Naturalization Service; Robert Clifford, Supervisor, INS Detention & Deportation; John Doe, Airline Carrier, Respondents/Defendants. No. 3:99CV1292(GLG). United States District Court, D. Connecticut. September 22, 1999.

Judge Chin dissents in a separate opinion. BARRINGTON D. PARKER, Circuit Judge: *154 John Doe is a judgment creditor who seeks attachment and turnover of electronic fund transfers (" EFTs ") initiated by sanctioned foreign terrorist organizations w

PRYOR, Circuit Judge: This appeal requires us to decide two issues: whether we have jurisdiction over an interlocutory appeal by criminal defense attorneys and their client who intervened in a proceeding ancillary to a criminal investigation to claim a privilege that would prevent the disclosure of their plea negotiations; and, if so, whether a privilege bars crime victims fro

SUAREZ, J. Adeena Weiss Ortiz [“Ortiz”] files the present petition for certiorari requesting this Court quash the trial court’s order, below granting in part and denying in part- respondent Caroline Weiss’s [“Weiss”] motion to discharge lis pendens or for adequate bond. We deny the petition for certiorari, finding the trial court did not depart from the. essential requirements o