Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Doe v. Trico Community School District No. 176”
Mr. JUSTICE JONES delivered the opinion of the court: Petitioners appeal from an order of the Circuit Court, First Judicial Circuit, Jackson County, quashing the summons and dismissing petitioners’ cause of action in an election contest for a recount in a bond and special issue referendum in Trico Community Unit School District No. 176, Perry, Jackson and Randolph Counties.</
8 Ill. App.2d 494 (1956) 131 N.E.2d 829 Trico Community Unit School District No. 176, Perry, Randolph and Jackson Counties, Illinois; Herman Wedemeyer and John Meyerhoff, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. County Board of School Trustees of Randolph County, Illinois, and Steeleville Community Unit School District No. 138, Randolph County, Illinois, Defendants-Appellees. Term No. 55-O-27.
Selmaville Community Consolidated School District No. 10 v. Salem Elementary School District No. 111public domain
Mr. PRESIDING JUSTICE KASSERMAN delivered the opinion of the court: Plaintiff, Selmaville Community Consolidated School District No. 10, appeals from the judgment of the circuit court of Marion County finding that it was not entitled to recover certain tax funds mistakenly paid to defendant, Salem Elementary School District No. 111.
Trico Community Unit School Dist. No. 176 v. Steeleville Community Unit School Dist. No. 138public domain
22 Ill. App.2d 39 (1959) 159 N.E.2d 507 Trico Community Unit School Dist. No. 176, Perry, Randolph and Jackson Counties, Illinois and T.J. Smith et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Steeleville Community Unit School Dist. No. 138, Randolph County, Illinois, Richard Bendorf, Sheriff and Ex-Officio County Collector of Randolph County, Illinois, Defendants-Appellees. Term No. 59-F-15.
Mr. Justice Daily delivered the opinion of the court: Proceeding under one of several methods provided for by section 4 B-2 of the School Code, (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1953, chap. 122, par. 4 B-2,) two thirds of the legal voters residing in three separate and distinct territories lying within Trico Community Unit School District No. 176, referred to in the record as t
NUMBER 13-09-00589-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG CHANDRASHEKHAR B. THANEDAR, Appellant, v. DONNA INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, Appellee. On appeal from the 398th District Court of Hidalg
NUMBER 13-09-00589-CV
Board of Education, Community High School District No. 154 v. Regional Board of School Trusteespublic domain
84 Ill. App.3d 501 (1980) 405 N.E.2d 495 BOARD OF EDUCATION, COMMUNITY HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 154, McHENRY COUNTY, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. REGIONAL BOARD OF SCHOOL TRUSTEES OF McHENRY COUNTY et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 79-404. Illinois Appellate Court Second District. Opinion filed May 28, 1980.
Board of Education of Jonesboro Community Consolidated School District No. 43 v. Regional Board of School Trusteespublic domain
Mr. JUSTICE EARNS, dissenting: I do not believe that the evidence here meets the test set out in Oakdale Community Consolidated School District v. County Board of School Trustees (1957), 12 Ill. 2d 190, 145 N.E.2d 736, for granting detachment and annexation petitions. As I read the opinion of the supreme court, the benefit to the
20 Ill. App.2d 252 (1959) 155 N.E.2d 650 Elma L. Lusk, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Community Consolidated School District No. 95 of Lake County, Illinois, Walter F. Surma et al., Defendants-Appellants. Gen. No. 11,212. Illinois Appellate Court Second District, First Division. January 28, 1959. Released for publication February 14, 1959.
74 Ill. App.2d 152 (1966) 219 N.E.2d 364 Sesser Community Unit District No. 196, Franklin County, Illinois, Gene Allsup, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. The County Board of School Trustees of Franklin County, Illinois, H.L. Browning, Secretary, County Board of School Trustees of Franklin County, Illinois, Herbert Mundell and Frank Hayse, and Community Consolidated School District No. 47, Franklin County, Illinois, and Con
Mr. Justice Klingbiel delivered the opinion of the court: On a petition signed by two thirds of the legal voters in certain described territory, the Randolph County Board of School Trustees entered an order detaching the territory from the school districts of which it had formed parts, and annexing it to the Coulterville School D
School Directors of School District No. 82 v. Keith Wolever County Board of School Trusteespublic domain
34 Ill. App.2d 95 (1962) 180 N.E.2d 345 School Directors of School District No. 82, County of Whiteside and State of Illinois, Ruth Martin and Dale Hofmeister, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Keith Wolever County Board of School Trustees of Whiteside County, Illinois, Administrative Agency, et al. (Keith Wolever et al., Defendants-Appellants.) Gen. No. 11,526. Illinois Appellate Court
15 Ill. App.2d 115 (1957) 145 N.E.2d 285 School Directors of School District No. 82, County of Whiteside, and State of Illinois, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. County Board of School Trustees of Whiteside County, Illinois, et al., Defendants-Appellants. School Directors of School District No. 82, County of Whiteside, and State of Illinois, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. County Board of School Trustees of White
160 Ill. App.3d 59 (1987) 513 N.E.2d 41 THE BOARD OF EDUCATION OF CARRIER MILLS-STONEFORT COMMUNITY UNIT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 2 OF SALINE COUNTY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. THE REGIONAL BOARD OF SCHOOL TRUSTEES OF GALLATIN, HARDIN, POPE AND SALINE COUNTIES, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 5-86-0584. Illinois Appellate Court Fifth District. Opinion filed
Jackson v. Board of Educationpublic domain
Mr. JUSTICE KARNS delivered the opinion of the court: . Plaintiff-petitioner Mary Ellen Jackson appeals the order of the Circuit Court of Jackson County dismissing before trial her complaint for declaratory judgment and petition for a writ of mandamus. She had sought reinstatement as a full-time teacher, back pay, and a declaration that she had received tenure.
Soublet v. Louisiana Tax Commissionpublic domain
766 F.Supp.2d 723 (2011) David M. SOUBLET, v. LOUISIANA TAX COMMISSION. Civil Action No. 09-6374. United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana. February 3, 2011. *725 Margaret Hammond-Jackson, Margaret Hammond-Jackson, Attorney at Law, Slidell, LA, for David M. Soublet. Winston Gerard Decuir, Jr., Decuir, Clark & Adams
Johnson Utilities LLC v. Arizona Corporationpublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA JOHNSON UTILITIES, L.L.C., AN ARIZONA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, Petitioner, V. ARIZONA CORPORATION COMMISSION; TOM FORESE, BOB BURNS, ANDY TOBIN, BOYD W. D UNN AND JUSTIN O LSON, IN THEIR OFFICIAL CAPACITIES AS MEMBERS OF THE ARIZONA CORPORATION COMMISSION Respondents.
FILED 13-0989 10/23/2015 12:22:31 PM tex-7515115 SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE, CLERK
Morgan v. Board of Educationpublic domain
22 Ill. App.3d 241 (1974) 317 N.E.2d 393 ANGELA MORGAN, by her Father and Next Friend, CLIFFORD MORGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. THE BOARD OF EDUCATION, TRICO COMMUNITY UNIT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 176, et al., Defendants-Appellants. No. 74-11. Illinois Appellate Court Fifth District. September 11, 1974. *242