Cases

F. Dennis Saylor IV, United States District Judge. This is a habeas petition involving an immigration matter. Petitioner Catherine Nantume is a Ugandan citizen who is subject to a final order of removal from the United States. She has filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus challenging her detention by immigration authorities. Nantume has an extensive history of immigration fraud. She e

MAXWELL, JUSTICE, FOR THE COURT: ¶1. When consent for a supposedly “uncontested” adoption is gained by intentionally concealing the identity of a known natural parent from the chancellor, a fraud is perpetrated upon the court.1 Such was the case here, where the natural mother schemed to give away her child without the natural father’s consent. She did so by falsely claiming — in h

OPINION OF THE COURT Lawrence H. Ecker, J. Documents numbered 1 to 28 were read on these motions for an order that petitioner file the petition and proceed anonymously, that he file any documents and exhibits under seal, and that respondents answer by using the pseudonym John Doe, and for an order pursuant to section 4506 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules suppressing the use of overheard conversations and

412 F.Supp.2d 944 (2006) Jane DOE, Plaintiff, v. Jason SMITH, Defendant. No. 04-3173. United States District Court, C.D. Illinois, Springfield Division. February 7, 2006. *945 Howard A. Peters, IV Scott & Scott, Springfield, IL, for Plaintiff. Frederick J. Schlosser Gates, Wise & Schlosser, PC, Springfield, IL, for

913 So.2d 140 (2005) John DOE, Individually and on Behalf of the Class v. Jo Ellen SMITH Medical Foundation d/b/a Jo Ellen Smith Medical Center and Jo Ellen Smith Psychiatric Center, et al. No. 2005-C-0653. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit. July 13, 2005. *141 W. Christopher Beary, R. Ray Orrill, Jr., Orrill, Cordell

Per Curiam. {¶ 1} This is an appeal and cross-appeal from a judgment granting a writ of mandamus to compel appellees and cross-appellants, Pierce Township Police Chief James T. Smith and the Pierce Township Board of Trustees, to produce certain records relating to an alleged incident or offense and awarding appellant and cross-appel

Clermont App. No. CA2008-01-006. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied. Pfeifer, J., dissents.

OPINION OF THE COURT Yvonne Gonzalez, J. On September 9, 1988, plaintiff, Jane Doe (hereinafter, Doe), was a full-time lab technician trainee at a hospital (hereinafter, Hospital) where Doe was stuck by a needle attached to a syringe (hereinafter, needle) while she was attempting to recap the needle with a rubber stopper. Doe attempted to recap the needle as the pus specimen in the syringe (hereinafter, s

105 F.Supp.2d 40 (1999) Jane DOE, Plaintiff, v. John SMITH, M.D., Defendant. No. 98CV6600 (ARR). United States District Court, E.D. New York. April 20, 1999. *41 Ellen Gesmer, Gulielmetti & Gesmer, P.C., New York City, for plaintiff. Bruce Brady, Callan, Regenstreich, Koster, & Brady, New York City, for defendant.<

AMENDED OPINION AND ORDER ROSS, District Judge. Plaintiff alleges that, in the course of providing the plaintiff with psychiatric treatment, the defendant assaulted, molested, and sexually abused the plaintiff. As a result of the sensitive nature of the subject matter of the case, the plaintiff moved the court either to allow her to proceed under a pseudonym or to seal all documents filed in th

*943OPINION OF THE COURT Guy P. De Phillips, J. By order to show cause dated and filed June 19, 1992, in this court (docket No. V4576/92) petitioner John Doe, the maternal grandfather of Amy Smith born October 31, 1991 to respondents Lisa and A1 Smith, seeks visitation with his grandchild. By order to show cause dated June 4, 1992 filed in Family Cour

In re Doe, John; — Plaintiff(s); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. CA90-0901; Parish of Lafayette, 15th Judicial District Court, Div. “E”, No. 87-3683-A. Prior report: La.App., 582 So.2d 999. Denied.

In re Doe, John Mr. and Mrs.; — Plaintiffs); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; Parish of East Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court, Div. “I”, No. 303563; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. CA89 1863. Prior report: La.App., 573 So.2d 238. Denied.

573 So.2d 238 (1990) Mr. & Mrs. John DOE[1] v. Mr. John SMITH. No. 89 CA 1863. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit. December 18, 1990. Writ Denied January 31, 1991. *239 Robert E. Kleinpeter, Steven R. Giglio, Baton Rouge, for plaintiffs-appellants Mr. and Mrs. John Doe. John W. Perr

573 So.2d 1139 (1991) Mr. and Mrs. John DOE v. John SMITH. No. 90-C-2749. Supreme Court of Louisiana. January 31, 1991. Denied.

879 F.2d 1340 55 Ed. Law Rep. 50 John DOE, a minor, By and Through his parent and nextfriend, Mary DOE, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Charles SMITH, Commissioner, Tennessee Department ofEducation et al., Defendants.Appeal of SUMNER COUNTY BOARD of EDUCATION, Defendant-Appellant. No. 88-5398. United States Court of Appeals,Sixth Circuit.

In re Doe, John Mr. and Mrs.; — Plaintiffs); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of East Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court, Div. “I”, No. 303563; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. CW89 1447. Denied.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2019-CA-01654-COA MICHAEL SMITH APPELLANT v. KATIE DOE APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 10/04/2019 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. SHEILA HAVARD SMALLWOOD COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: FORREST COUNTY CHANCERY COURT ATTORNEY

527 N.E.2d 177 (1988) John DOE, Appellant, v. Jane SMITH, Appellee. No. 20S00-8806-CV-551. Supreme Court of Indiana. August 24, 1988. Rehearing Denied December 14, 1988. Robert J. Palmer, Maggie Mawby Chipman, May, Oberfell & Lorber, South Bend, Steven J. Strawbridge, Indianapolis, James Bopp, Jr., Richard E. Coleson, Brames, McCormick, Bopp &am;

Justice Stevens, Circuit Justice. Applicant has filed an application with me as Circuit Justice to enter an order enjoining Jane Smith from obtaining an abortion of their unborn child. For the reasons hereinafter stated, the application is denied. Applicant initiated proceedings seeking this relief from the Elkhart, Indiana, Superior Court on May 31, 198