Cases

MATHESON, Circuit Judge. The plaintiffs are, or at all relevant times were, high school students from Ros *29 well, New Mexico, who belong to a religious group called “Relentless” (“Plaintiffs”). 1 They sued Roswell Independent School District

961 P.2d 804 (1998) 1998 OK 58 Robert H. MACY, et al., Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. OKLAHOMA CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT NUMBER 89, and Ron Bogle, Frank Kellert, Wayne Dempsey, Thelma R. Parks, Tom Yeargain, Terri Silver, and Michael Carter, in their official capacities as members of the Board of Education of Oklahoma City School District No. 89, Defendants/Appellees. No. 89674. Supreme C

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2008 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

OPINION BOHANON, District Judge. This is a diversity action instituted by the plaintiff, Independent School District *36893, Pottawatomie County, Oklahoma, hereinafter referred to as District, against the defendant, Western Surety Company, hereinafter referred to as Surety, on two successive bonds executed by the Surety to secure the faithful perfo

Justice SAYLOR, concurring. I agree with the majority that the trial court should not have sustained the School District’s preliminary objections in the nature of a demurrer on the present record, and that the case must therefore be remanded for further proceedings. I write separately, however, because I am less certain than the majority that the School District’s decision, as memorialized in Policy 227, to

39 P.3d 152 (2001) 2001 OK CIV APP 153 TULSA ORDER OF POLICE LODGE NO. 93, on behalf of Officers Dan TEDRICK, Kevin Staats, and Corporal Dan Fuller, Plaintiffs/Appellees, v. CITY OF TULSA, Oklahoma, a municipal corporation, and Mayor Susan Savage, Defendants/Appellants. No. 95,044. Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, Division No. 2. June 12, 2001.

242 F.3d 1264 (10th Cir. 2001) LINDSAY EARLS and LACEY EARLS, minors, by their next friends and parents, John David Earls and Lori Earls; DANIEL JAMES, a minor,by his friend and mother, Leta Hagar, Plaintiffs - Appellants,v.BOARD OF EDUCATION OF TECUMSEH PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT, Independent School District No. 92 of Pottawatomie County; TECUMSEH PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT, Independent School District No. 92 of Pottawatomie County, Defendants - A

USCA11 Case: 18-13592 Date Filed: 07/14/2021 Page: 1 of 80 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 18-13592 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 3:17-cv-00739-TJC-JBT DREW ADAMS, a minor, by and

Case: 18-13592 Date Filed: 08/07/2020 Page: 1 of 74 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 18-13592 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 3:17-cv-00739-TJC-JBT DREW ADAMS, a minor, by and through his n

Case: 18-13592 Date Filed: 08/07/2020 Page: 1 of 74 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 18-13592 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 3:17-cv-00739-TJC-JBT DREW ADAMS, a minor, by and through his n

EBEL, Circuit Judge, dissenting I respectfully dissent from the panel’s decision in this difficult case. Although I agree with many of the standards articulated by the majority in its opinion, I am unconvinced that the majority has actually followed those standards in reaching its final conclusion. 1. Special Needs Analysis j agree with the majority that, under Ver

336 F.3d 1194 Jack DUBBS, individually, and as father and next friend of Tiffani Dubbs, a minor; Francisco Aguirre, individually, and as father and next friend of Jessica Aguirre, a minor; Joy Brown, individually, and as mother and next friend of Marii Brown, a minor; Keenya Cowans, individually, and as mother and next friend of Keymiya Cowans, a minor; Shanika Crowley, individually, and as mother and next friend of Kwanita M. Crowley, a minor; R

The opinion of the court was delivered by STERN, P.J.A.D. Defendants, Hunterdon Central Regional High School (“Hunter-don Central”) and its Acting Superintendent of Schools, Judith Gray, appeal from a judgment entered on January 29, 2001, declaring the policy concerning drug and alcohol testing of students at Hunterdon Central in violation of the New Jersey Constitution and enjoining defendants from implemen

On April 18, 1932, there was filed in the office of the county superintendent of public instruction of Pottawatomie county; Okla., a petition addressed to that officer and signed by 33 persons claiming to be qualified electors of school district No. 84, in that county, the petition being styled "Petition to Change Boundary Line of School District No. 84, Twp. No. 6, Range No. 4 E." The body of the petition reads: "We, the undersigned, composing more than one-half of the qualified elect

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 23-2249 ___________________________ Continental Resources, Inc., an Oklahoma corporation Plaintiff - Appellee v. North Dakota Board of University and School Lands

MEMORANDUM OPINION THEODORE D. CHUANG, United States District Judge On March 6, 2017, President Donald J. Trump issued an Executive Order which bars, with certain exceptions, the entry to the United States of nationals of six predominantly Muslim countries, suspends the entry of refugees for 120 days, and cuts by more than half the number of refugees to be admitted to the United States in the current year

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER 1 JAMES O. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Santa Fe Public Schools Board of Education’s Motion for Summary Judgment on Count I of Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint [Doc. 100], filed March 3, 2014 (Doc. 187) (“MSJ”). The Court held a hearing on April 8, 2014. The primary issues are: (i)

II. LEGAL STANDARDS Pursuant to the Second Circuit's direction, the court addresses only "issues of jurisdiction and justiciability" at this point in the proceedings. (Oct. 24, 2017, USCA Order; Oct. 27, 2017, Order (Dkt. 98).) Accordingly, the court will consider only those portions of Defendants' motion to dismiss that challenge the court's subject-matter jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civi

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES O. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Individual School Defendant Melanie Romero’s Motion for Summary Judgment on Count I of the Second Amended Complaint Based Upon Qualified Immunity, filed Nov. 13, 2012 (Doc. 113)(“Motion for Summary Judgment”). The Court held a hearing on December 20, 2012. The primary issues are: (i) whe

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER 1 JAMES O. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Defendant ASI New Mexico, LLC’s Motion for Summary Judgment on Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint [Doc. 100] and Supporting Memorandum, filed March 3, 2014 (Doc. 182)(“MSJ”). The Court held a hearing on April 22, 2014. The primary issue is whether Defendant