Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Doe v. Dehlinger”
United States v. Erik Dehlingerpublic domain
Affirmed by published opinion. Judge MOTZ wrote the opinion, in which Judge DAVIS joined. Judge GREGORY wrote a separate opinion concurring in the judgment. DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ, Circuit Judge: A jury convicted Dr. Erik Dehlinger of three counts of filing false income tax returns. He received a sentence of forty-two months imprisonment and one year of supervised release and was ordered to pay $363,207 in re
Dehlinger v. City of Chicagopublic domain
Mr. Justice Waterman delivered the opinion of the court. This was an action to recover damages alleged to have been sustained by appellant in consequence of her stepping into a hole in a sidewalk* on Washtenaw avenue in the city of Chicago. The plaintiff testified as follows: “When injured I lived at Ho. 1417 N. Washtenaw avenue, wi
State ex rel. Kearney v. Dehlingerpublic domain
CuRRiER, Judge, delivered tire opinion of the court. The only point requiring attention in this record relates to the jurisdiction of the justice before whom the suit was Originally brought. If the suit was commenced under section 19, chapter 82, article 8, p. 844, Wagner’s Statutes (Gen. Stat. 1865, p. 721, § 19), for a failure on the part of the constable to return an execution according to its command, the
Mullins v. Mullinspublic domain
BERGER, J. Robert Mullins appeals a summary final judgment ordering the partition and sale of the residence he and his siblings, Kenneth Mullins and Carla Mullins, inherited from their mother, Sarah Jane Mullins. He argues that the trial court erred when, in ordering the partition, it relied solely on an order determining homestead instead of the directive in his mother's will bequeathing him and his brother Kenneth a life estate in
Mullins v. Mullinspublic domain
BERGER, J. Robert Mullins appeals a summary final judgment ordering the partition and sale of the residence he and his siblings, Kenneth Mullins and Carla Mullins, inherited from their mother, Sarah Jane Mullins. He argues that the trial court erred when, in ordering the partition, it relied solely on an order determining homestead instead of the directive in his mother's will bequeathing him and his brother Kenneth a life estate in
Ginzl v. Ginzl (In Re Ginzl)public domain
430 B.R. 702 (2010) In re Paul Christopher GINZL, Debtor. Carlen Ginzl, Plaintiff, v. Paul Christopher Ginzl, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 6:09-bk-15478-ABB. Adversary No. 6:10-ap-00015-ABB. United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida, Orlando Division. June 29, 2010. *703 Richard B. Webber, II, Zimmerman Kiser & Sutcliffe
Cleveland Nat'l Forest Found. v. Cnty. of San Diegopublic domain
O'ROURKE, J. *1029Real party in interest and respondent Genesee Properties, Inc. (Genesee) sought tentative map approval from respondent County of San Diego (the County) for a 24-lot subdivision on 1416.5 acres of land in San Diego County known as the Hoskings Ranch (the property). The property is within a County-designated agricultural pre
Daniel Chippewa v. Statepublic domain
GUTIERREZ, Chief Judge. Daniel Chippewa appeals from the judgment of the district court summarily dismissing his petition for post-conviction relief. The issue raised on appeal is whether the district court erred when it summarily dismissed Chippewa’s post-conviction claim that he received ineffective assistance of counsel because he was represented by conflicted counsel. For th
Zubkin v. Zubkinpublic domain
823 So.2d 870 (2002) Allan ZUBKIN, Appellant, v. Joy Grace ZUBKIN, Appellee. No. 5D01-2812. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District. August 23, 2002. *871 Edward P. Jordan, II of Edward P. Jordan, II, P.A., Clermont, for Appellant. Charles A. Dehlinger, Altamonte Springs, for Appellee. PETERSON, J. <
Deoca v. Deocapublic domain
837 So.2d 1137 (2003) Alan Montes DEOCA, Appellant, v. Susan Montes DEOCA, Appellee. No. 5D02-1329. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District. February 21, 2003. *1138 Charles A. Dehlinger, Altamonte Springs, for Appellant. Wiley Andrew Rariden, Orlando, for Appellee. PETERSON, J. Alan Montes Deoca
Pavolini v. Williamspublic domain
915 So.2d 251 (2005) Arturo PAVOLINI and Maria Rivera, Appellant, v. Winston WILLIAMS, et al., Appellee. No. 5D05-1170. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District. December 2, 2005. *252 Frederic Stanley, Jr., of Stanley, Dehlinger & Rascher, P.A., Altamonte Springs, for Appellant. No Appearance for Appellee.<
Sanders v. Palmieripublic domain
PER CURIAM. The final order that is the subject of this appeal is affirmed. The cross-appeal concerning attorneys’ fees, however, is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. While the trial court has entered an order determining entitlement to attorneys’ fees, it has not yet fixed the amount to be awarded. As an award of attorneys’ fees does not become final, and, therefore, appealable until the amount is set by the trial court,
Corey Woodfolk v. Gary Maynardpublic domain
Vacated and remanded by published opinion. Chief Judge Gregory wrote the opinion, in which Judge King and Senior Judge Davis joined. GREGORY, Chief Judge: In March 1988, Corey Lorenzo Woodfolk pleaded guilty in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City to attempted murder and a related firearm offense. Several months after his plea, Woodfolk sought relief fro
Filed 8/21/19 (unmodified opinion attached) CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA CLEVELAND NATIONAL FOREST D073744 FOUNDATION et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Super. Ct. No. v.
Filed 7/25/19 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA CLEVELAND NATIONAL FOREST D073744 FOUNDATION et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Super. Ct. No. v. 37-2016-00041519-CU-TT-C
T.W. v. School Boardpublic domain
PRYOR, Circuit Judge: This appeal presents the questions whether a teacher violated a disabled student’s constitutional right to be free from excessive corporal punishment or discriminated against the student solely by reason of his disability, in violation of a federal statute, when the teacher physically and verbally abused the student on several occasions. The student, T.W., was enrolled for several months in Kathleen Gar
OPINION N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judge: The Supreme Court “has adopted what amounts to a two-tiered approach to analyzing state economic regulation under the *1040 Commerce Clause.” Broum-Forman Distillers Corp. v. N.Y. State Liquor Auth., 476 U.S. 573, 57
Tw Ex Rel. Wilson v. School Bd., Seminole, Fla.public domain
610 F.3d 588 (2010) T.W., a minor, by Tracy M. WILSON, his next friend, mother and natural guardian, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The SCHOOL BOARD OF SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA, a subdivision of the State of Florida, Kathleen Mary Garrett, individually, Florida Department of Financial Services, Defendants-Appellees. No. 09-12623. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. June
Pfizer Inc. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.public domain
482 F.Supp.2d 390 (2007) PFIZER INC., Pharmacia Corp., Pharmacia & Upjohn Inc., Pharmacia & Upjohn Company, G.D. Searle & Co., G.D. Searle LLC, Searle LLC (Delaware) and Searle LLC (Nevada) Plaintiffs, v. TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC. Defendant. No. CIV.A. 04-754(JCL). United States District Court, D. New Jersey. March 20, 2007.
In Re Marshall W. Cronynpublic domain
890 F.2d 1158 58 USLW 2376, 57 Ed. Law Rep. 405, 13U.S.P.Q.2d 1070 In re Marshall W. CRONYN. No. 89-1434. United States Court of Appeals,Federal Circuit. Nov. 29, 1989. Peter J. Dehlinger, Palo Alto, Cal., argued for appellant. Nancy C. Slutter, Associate So