⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Doe v. Citigroup, Inc.”

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008-07-24 · Published · cited 22× · 535 F.3d 45; 44 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1449; 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 15645; 2008 WL 2840601
535 F.3d 45 (2008) In re CITIGROUP, INC. Capital Accumulation Plan Litigation Richard H. Gilmore, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. Citigroup, Inc.; Citifinancial, Inc.; Travelers Group Inc.; Salomon Smith Barney Inc.; Salomon Smith Barney Holdings Inc.; Smith Barney Inc.; Salomon Brothers, Inc.; Primerica Financial Services, Inc.; ABC Corps., 1-100; John Does, 1-100, Defendants, Appellees. J
District Court, S.D. New York · 2011-06-07 · Published · cited 5× · 797 F. Supp. 2d 354; 51 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2105; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 61329; 2011 WL 2209145
797 F.Supp.2d 354 (2011) Daniel BRECHER, Scott Short, Chad Taylor, Jennifer Murphy, Paul Koch and Mark Oelfke, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. CITIGROUP INC.; Citigroup Global Markets, Inc.; Alain J.P. Belda; C. Michael Armstrong; Kenneth T. Derr, John M. Deutch; Richard D. Parsons; Ann Dibble Jordan; Citigroup, Inc. Personnel and Compensation Committee; and John Does 1-30, Defendants.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005-07-07 · Published · cited 24× · 416 F.3d 382
416 F.3d 382 Patricia BOONE, et al., Plaintiffs,Patricia Boone; Mandolyn Boyd; Mary Jordan; Mary McBride; Arthaway McCullough; Constance McFarland; Eugene Paine; Bernice Paine; Mary Spratt; Peggy Washington, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.CITIGROUP, INC.; Citifinancial Inc.; Associates First Capital Corporation; Associates Corporation of North America; Paul Spears; D. Lavender; Michelle Easter; John Does 1-50; Citifinancial Corporation, Defend
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005-07-07 · Published · cited 93× · 416 F.3d 382; 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 13471; 2005 WL 1581091
GARWOOD, Circuit Judge: Appellants, all of whom are residents of Mississippi, brought suit in Mississippi state court alleging only state law claims against five out-of-state corporations and three individual Mississippi residents. One of the corporate appellees removed the case to federal court on the ground that the three in-state residents had been improperly joined in order t
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011-10-19 · Published · cited 1× · 662 F.3d 128; 51 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1737; 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 21463
Judge STRAUB dissents in part and concurs in part in a separate opinion. JOHN M. WALKER, JR., Circuit Judge: Plaintiffs, participants in retirement plans offered by defendants Citigroup Inc. and Citibank, N.A., and covered by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq., appeal from the judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ne
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011-07-13 · Published · cited 3× · 652 F.3d 88; 17 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 1604; 51 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2561; 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 14296; 2011 WL 2698603
652 F.3d 88 (2011) In re CITIGROUP, INC. CAPITAL ACCUMULATION PLAN LITIGATION. Jerome Renaudin; Steven Rodemer, Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. Citigroup Global Markets Inc.; Smith Barney Inc.; Citifinancial Inc.; Citigroup Inc.; Travelers Group Inc.; Salomon Smith Barney Holdings Inc.; Salomon Smith Barney Inc.; Primerica Financial Services, Inc., Defendants, Appellees, ABC Corps 1-100; John Does 1-100, Defendants. No. 1
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023-02-09 · Published · cited 1× · 2023 NY Slip Op 00752
Williams v Citigroup, Inc. (2023 NY Slip Op 00752) Williams v Citigroup, Inc. 2023 NY Slip Op 00752 Decided on February 09, 2023 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023-02-09 · Published · cited 1× · 2023 NY Slip Op 00752
Williams v Citigroup, Inc. (2023 NY Slip Op 00752) Williams v Citigroup, Inc. 2023 NY Slip Op 00752 Decided on February 09, 2023 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019-09-03 · Published · cited 2× · 2019 NY Slip Op 6440
Weiser v Citigroup, Inc. (2019 NY Slip Op 06440) Weiser v Citigroup, Inc. 2019 NY Slip Op 06440 Decided on September 3, 2019 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2018-09-19 · Published · cited 1× · 255 So. 3d 1128
Judge Tiffany G. Chase Plaintiffs, Pablo Guth, Jacob Guth, Nicholas Guth and Amanda Guth, (hereinafter the "Guths") appeal the trial court's December 1, 2015 order denying a motion and order to set aside an order of dismissal for abandonment. For the reasons that follow, we vacate the trial court's order and remand the case for further proceedings. Factual and Procedural History On
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019-04-25 · Published · cited 0× · 2019 NY Slip Op 3147
Weiser v Citigroup, Inc. (2019 NY Slip Op 03147) Weiser v Citigroup, Inc. 2019 NY Slip Op 03147 Decided on April 25, 2019 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019-09-03 · Published · cited 1× · 2019 NY Slip Op 6440
Weiser v Citigroup, Inc. (2019 NY Slip Op 06440) Weiser v Citigroup, Inc. 2019 NY Slip Op 06440 Decided on September 3, 2019 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020-07-01 · Published · cited 22× · 963 F.3d 1331
Case: 18-12663 Date Filed: 07/01/2020 Page: 1 of 46 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 18-12663 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 1:16-cv-20725-DPG
District Court, S.D. New York · 2016-07-19 · Published · cited 62× · 195 F. Supp. 3d 475; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 94220; 2016 WL 3945692
OPINION AND ORDER JESSE M. FURMAN, United States District Judge: Plaintiffs Paulina Korenblum, Fredy Giron, and Kenneth M. Butler bring this action on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, alleging violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq., and the New York State Labor Law (“NYLL”), N.Y. Lab, Law § 650 et seq. (See Compl. (Docket No. 1). Plai
District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018-09-28 · Published · cited 24× · 346 F. Supp. 3d 473
J. PAUL OETKEN, United States District Judge *479Plaintiffs, a group of investment funds known as "Silvercreek," brought this action against Defendants, a set of financial institutions, for conduct relating to the issuance of debt securities by Enron Corporation ("Enron").1 Plaintiffs assert claims under New York state tort law and under fed
District Court, D. Colorado · 2016-11-02 · Published · cited 2× · 221 F. Supp. 3d 1260; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 178336; 2016 WL 6945085
*1261ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S CONSTRUED MOTION William J. Martinez, United States District Judge Before the Court is a letter the Court received from Plaintiff on March 7, 2016. (ECF No. 25.) The Court construed the letter “as a motion to un-restrict ECF No. 13 and to compel the Government to explain its decision not
United States Court of Federal Claims · 2018-10-24 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 15-953T (Filed: October 24, 2018) ******************** CITIGROUP, INC., Tax refund suit; FIRREA; Winstar; Supervisory goodwill; Plaintiff, Worthless asset deduction; v. Reliance damages; I.R.C. §
District Court, S.D. New York · 2017-03-31 · Published · cited 11× · 248 F. Supp. 3d 428; 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 49230
OPINION AND ORDER J. PAUL OETKEN, United States District Judge Plaintiffs, a group of investment funds, brought this action against Defendants, a set of financial institutions and individuals, for conduct relating to the issuance of debt securities by Enron Corporation (“Enron”).1 (See Dkt. No. 10-115 (“TAC”).) *434
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2025-05-08 · Published · cited 21× · 137 F.4th 1158
USCA11 Case: 23-13152 Document: 41-1 Date Filed: 05/08/2025 Page: 1 of 82 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-13152 ____________________ OTTO CANDIES, LLC, ADAR MACRO FUND LTD., ASHMO
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014-04-04 · Published · cited 26× · 748 F.3d 677; 22 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 483; 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 6210; 2014 WL 1327868
OPINION SUTTON, Circuit Judge. When Keith Russell accepted a job with Citicorp Credit Services, he agreed to arbitrate “all employment-related disputes” *679 with the company. Does that mean he must arbitrate a case already pending in court when he signed the agreement? We t