Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Doe v. Citigroup, Inc.”
Gilmore v. Citigroup, Inc.public domain
535 F.3d 45 (2008) In re CITIGROUP, INC. Capital Accumulation Plan Litigation Richard H. Gilmore, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. Citigroup, Inc.; Citifinancial, Inc.; Travelers Group Inc.; Salomon Smith Barney Inc.; Salomon Smith Barney Holdings Inc.; Smith Barney Inc.; Salomon Brothers, Inc.; Primerica Financial Services, Inc.; ABC Corps., 1-100; John Does, 1-100, Defendants, Appellees. J
Brecher v. CITIGROUP INC.public domain
797 F.Supp.2d 354 (2011) Daniel BRECHER, Scott Short, Chad Taylor, Jennifer Murphy, Paul Koch and Mark Oelfke, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. CITIGROUP INC.; Citigroup Global Markets, Inc.; Alain J.P. Belda; C. Michael Armstrong; Kenneth T. Derr, John M. Deutch; Richard D. Parsons; Ann Dibble Jordan; Citigroup, Inc. Personnel and Compensation Committee; and John Does 1-30, Defendants.
Boone v. Citigroup, Inc.public domain
416 F.3d 382 Patricia BOONE, et al., Plaintiffs,Patricia Boone; Mandolyn Boyd; Mary Jordan; Mary McBride; Arthaway McCullough; Constance McFarland; Eugene Paine; Bernice Paine; Mary Spratt; Peggy Washington, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.CITIGROUP, INC.; Citifinancial Inc.; Associates First Capital Corporation; Associates Corporation of North America; Paul Spears; D. Lavender; Michelle Easter; John Does 1-50; Citifinancial Corporation, Defend
Boone v. Citigroup, Inc.public domain
GARWOOD, Circuit Judge: Appellants, all of whom are residents of Mississippi, brought suit in Mississippi state court alleging only state law claims against five out-of-state corporations and three individual Mississippi residents. One of the corporate appellees removed the case to federal court on the ground that the three in-state residents had been improperly joined in order t
Gray v. Citigroup Inc.public domain
Judge STRAUB dissents in part and concurs in part in a separate opinion. JOHN M. WALKER, JR., Circuit Judge: Plaintiffs, participants in retirement plans offered by defendants Citigroup Inc. and Citibank, N.A., and covered by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq., appeal from the judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ne
Renaudin v. Citigroup Global Markets Inc.public domain
652 F.3d 88 (2011) In re CITIGROUP, INC. CAPITAL ACCUMULATION PLAN LITIGATION. Jerome Renaudin; Steven Rodemer, Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. Citigroup Global Markets Inc.; Smith Barney Inc.; Citifinancial Inc.; Citigroup Inc.; Travelers Group Inc.; Salomon Smith Barney Holdings Inc.; Salomon Smith Barney Inc.; Primerica Financial Services, Inc., Defendants, Appellees, ABC Corps 1-100; John Does 1-100, Defendants. No. 1
Williams v. Citigroup, Inc.public domain
Williams v Citigroup, Inc. (2023 NY Slip Op 00752) Williams v Citigroup, Inc. 2023 NY Slip Op 00752 Decided on February 09, 2023 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law
Williams v. Citigroup, Inc.public domain
Williams v Citigroup, Inc. (2023 NY Slip Op 00752) Williams v Citigroup, Inc. 2023 NY Slip Op 00752 Decided on February 09, 2023 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law
Weiser v. Citigroup, Inc.public domain
Weiser v Citigroup, Inc. (2019 NY Slip Op 06440) Weiser v Citigroup, Inc. 2019 NY Slip Op 06440 Decided on September 3, 2019 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant
Guth v. Citigroup, Inc.public domain
Judge Tiffany G. Chase Plaintiffs, Pablo Guth, Jacob Guth, Nicholas Guth and Amanda Guth, (hereinafter the "Guths") appeal the trial court's December 1, 2015 order denying a motion and order to set aside an order of dismissal for abandonment. For the reasons that follow, we vacate the trial court's order and remand the case for further proceedings. Factual and Procedural History On
Weiser v. Citigroup, Inc.public domain
Weiser v Citigroup, Inc. (2019 NY Slip Op 03147) Weiser v Citigroup, Inc. 2019 NY Slip Op 03147 Decided on April 25, 2019 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to
Weiser v. Citigroup, Inc.public domain
Weiser v Citigroup, Inc. (2019 NY Slip Op 06440) Weiser v Citigroup, Inc. 2019 NY Slip Op 06440 Decided on September 3, 2019 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant
Otto Candies, LLC v. Citigroup, Inc.public domain
Case: 18-12663 Date Filed: 07/01/2020 Page: 1 of 46 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 18-12663 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 1:16-cv-20725-DPG
Korenblum v. Citigroup, Inc.public domain
OPINION AND ORDER JESSE M. FURMAN, United States District Judge: Plaintiffs Paulina Korenblum, Fredy Giron, and Kenneth M. Butler bring this action on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, alleging violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq., and the New York State Labor Law (“NYLL”), N.Y. Lab, Law § 650 et seq. (See Compl. (Docket No. 1). Plai
Silvercreek Mgmt., Inc. v. Citigroup, Inc.public domain
J. PAUL OETKEN, United States District Judge *479Plaintiffs, a group of investment funds known as "Silvercreek," brought this action against Defendants, a set of financial institutions, for conduct relating to the issuance of debt securities by Enron Corporation ("Enron").1 Plaintiffs assert claims under New York state tort law and under fed
Wolff v. Citigroup, Inc.public domain
*1261ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S CONSTRUED MOTION William J. Martinez, United States District Judge Before the Court is a letter the Court received from Plaintiff on March 7, 2016. (ECF No. 25.) The Court construed the letter “as a motion to un-restrict ECF No. 13 and to compel the Government to explain its decision not
Citigroup, Inc. v. United Statespublic domain
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 15-953T (Filed: October 24, 2018) ******************** CITIGROUP, INC., Tax refund suit; FIRREA; Winstar; Supervisory goodwill; Plaintiff, Worthless asset deduction; v. Reliance damages; I.R.C. §
Silvercreek Management, Inc. v. Citigroup, Inc.public domain
OPINION AND ORDER J. PAUL OETKEN, United States District Judge Plaintiffs, a group of investment funds, brought this action against Defendants, a set of financial institutions and individuals, for conduct relating to the issuance of debt securities by Enron Corporation (“Enron”).1 (See Dkt. No. 10-115 (“TAC”).) *434
Otto Candies, LLC v. Citigroup Inc.public domain
USCA11 Case: 23-13152 Document: 41-1 Date Filed: 05/08/2025 Page: 1 of 82 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-13152 ____________________ OTTO CANDIES, LLC, ADAR MACRO FUND LTD., ASHMO
Keith Russell v. Citigroup, Inc.public domain
OPINION SUTTON, Circuit Judge. When Keith Russell accepted a job with Citicorp Credit Services, he agreed to arbitrate “all employment-related disputes” *679 with the company. Does that mean he must arbitrate a case already pending in court when he signed the agreement? We t