⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Doe v. Adair School District 25”

California Court of Appeal · 2008-05-19 · Published · cited 10× · 162 Cal. App. 4th 1436; 77 Cal. Rptr. 3d 62; 2008 Cal. App. LEXIS 747
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 1438 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 1439 OPINION In order to reduce salary stagnation among mid- to upper-level teachers and stay competitive w
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2002-09-06 · Published · cited 2× · 57 P.3d 882; 2002 OK CIV APP 97; 73 O.B.A.J. 3062; 2002 Okla. Civ. App. LEXIS 82; 2002 WL 31416015
MITCHELL, J. ¶ 1 After a due process hearing, Appel-lee, Stilwell School District, dismissed a career teacher, Appellant, Donna Hill, who served as a certified high-school guidance counselor, on the grounds of moral turpitude and willful neglect of duty. Following the hearing, Hill filed a petition in the district court for a trial de novo. Finding Hill had falsified certain entries on the transcripts of several stude
Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020-06-23 · Published · cited 10× · 2020 OK 56
OSCN Found Document:INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT # 52 v. HOFMEISTER INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT # 52 v. HOFMEISTER2020 OK 56Case Number: 117081Decided: 06/23/2020THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA Cite as: 2020 OK 56, __ P.3d __ NOTICE: THIS OPINION HAS NOT BEEN RELEASED FOR PUBLICATION. UNTIL RELEASED, IT
Adair v. Hunterpublic domain
District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2017-02-16 · Published · cited 1× · 236 F. Supp. 3d 1034; 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 63186; 2017 WL 1379655
ORDER HARRY S. MATTICE, JR., UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Before the Court is Defendants’ Amended Motion for Partial Dismissal of Complaint (Doc. 40).1 For the reasons stated herein, Defendants’ Motion will be GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. 1. BACKGROUND Plaintiffs initiated this action on January 6, 2016 claiming that Defendants,
California Court of Appeal · 2019-10-11 · Published · cited 0×
Filed 9/19/19 Certified for Publication 10/11/19 (order attached) COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA RON KOENIG, D072463 Plaintiff, Cross-defendant and Appellant, (Super. Ct. No. 37-2015-00015380- v.
Adair v. Adairpublic domain
Missouri Court of Appeals · 2004-01-20 · Published · cited 12× · 124 S.W.3d 34; 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 59; 2004 WL 76366
124 S.W.3d 34 (2004) Barry ADAIR, Appellant-Respondent, v. Darla ADAIR, Respondent-Appellant. Nos. WD 61875, WD 61887. Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District. January 20, 2004. *36 Michael Paul Bandre, Overland Park, KS, for appellant-respondent. Nancy Agnes Beardsley, Independence, for respondent-appellant. RO
Adair v. Michiganpublic domain
Michigan Court of Appeals · 2012-11-06 · Published · cited 0× · 298 Mich. App. 383
ON THIRD REMAND Before: SAAD, EJ., and TALBOT and FORT HOOD, JJ. TALBOT, J. This original action returns on remand from our Supreme Court for a determination of costs to be awarded to plaintiffs under § 32 of the Headlee Amendment, Const 1963, art 9, § 32.1 We referred this matter to a special master, with the consent of the parties, to review the reason
Adair v. Michiganpublic domain
Michigan Supreme Court · 2014-12-22 · Published · cited 23× · 497 Mich. 89; 860 N.W.2d 93
Young, C.J. I. INTRODUCTION This Court is yet again faced with a challenge to the Legislature’s education-related funding appropriation *94for state-imposed mandates under the Headlee Amendment.1 Plaintiffs are taxpayers and school districts seeking a declaratory judgment th
District Court, D. New Mexico · 2015-06-17 · Published · cited 2× · 157 F. Supp. 3d 1055; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 175637; 2015 WL 9943434
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER MARTHA VÁZQUEZ, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Defendant Bloomfield School District and- Defendant Bloomfield School District Board of Education’s (collectively, the “Governmental Defendants”) Motion and Memorandum for Summary Judgment [Doc. 101] and Defendant Rob Ford’s Motion and Memorandum in Support of Summary Judgment [Doc. 1
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991-06-10 · Published · cited 19× · 936 F.2d 472; 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 11697
936 F.2d 472 68 Ed. Law Rep. 278, 33 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 247 A.E., By and Through her next friends, Daniel and MargaretEVANS, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 25, OF ADAIR COUNTY,OKLAHOMA, a/k/a Stilwell Public Schools, Defendant-Appellee. No. 90-7018. United States Court of Appeals,Tenth Circuit. June 10,
Adair v. Statepublic domain
Michigan Court of Appeals · 2013-08-22 · Published · cited 0× · 302 Mich. App. 305; 2013 WL 4487500
PER CURIAM. This original taxpayer action is brought pursuant to the provisions of the Headlee Amendment, Const 1963, art 9, §§ 25 through 34. The action addresses the parameters of the state’s funding obligations under the second sentence of § 29 of the amendment — commonly referred to as the “prohibition of unfunded mandates” or POUM provision — and Proposal A, Const 1963, art 9, § 11. Our Supreme Court held that the state viol
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016-05-26 · Published · cited 114× · 823 F.3d 1297; 32 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1409; 41 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 734; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 9636; 2016 WL 3034084
PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge. Robert Adair was a firefighter with the City of Muskogee, Oklahoma (the City) when he injured his back during a training exercise. As a result of his injury, Adair completed a functional-capacity evaluation that measured and limited' his lifting capabilities. After two years on paid leave, Adair received a workers’ compensation award definitively stati
Adair v. Statepublic domain
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2011-03-30 · Published · cited 12× · 336 S.W.3d 680; 2010 WL 3564842
TERRY JENNINGS, Justice, dissenting. The trial court’s finding that appellant, Jamal Lance Adair, did not prove purposeful discrimination in the State’s use of a peremptory strike against venire member 39, an African-American, is clearly erroneous, and the majority errs in holding to the contrary. In fact, the clerk’s record reveals that the State’s sole explanation for striking venire member 89, i.e., that he
Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2017-05-24 · Published · cited 18× · 159 A.3d 713; 2017 WL 2271390; 2017 Del. Ch. LEXIS 86
OPINION LASTER, Vice Chancellor. In February 2015, Red Clay Consolidated School District (“Red Clay”) held a special election in which residents were asked to approve an increase in the school-related property taxes paid by owners of non-exempt real estate located within the district (the “Special Election”). Red Clay prevailed in the Special Election, w
Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2015-10-07 · Published · cited 9× · 122 A.3d 784; 2015 Del. Ch. LEXIS 257; 2015 WL 5895838
OPINION LASTER, Vice Chancellor. On February 24, 2015, Red Clay Consolidated School District (“Red Clay”) sought approval from voters to increase the school-related property taxes paid by owners of non-exempt real estate located within the school district. The referendum passed with 6,395 residents voting in favor and 5,515 against.
Supreme Court of the United States · 2025-06-27 · Published · cited 0× · 606 U.S. 831
(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2024 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit
Adair v. Winterpublic domain
District Court, District of Columbia · 2006-09-11 · Published · cited 3× · 451 F. Supp. 2d 210; 2006 WL 2587580
451 F.Supp.2d 210 (2006) Robert H. ADAIR et al., Plaintiffs, v. Donald C. WINTER,[1] Secretary of the Navy et al., Defendants. Chaplaincy of Full Gospel Churches et al., Plaintiffs, v. Donald C. Winter, Secretary of the Navy et al,, Defendants. Civil Action Nos. 00-0566 (RMU), 99-2945(RMU). United States District Court, District of Columbia. September 11,
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2016-05-04 · Published · cited 14× · 195 So. 3d 501; 2016 WL 2342353; 2016 La. App. LEXIS 869
LOLLEY, J. 11 This appeal arises from the First Judicial District Court, Parish of Caddo, State of Louisiana. Adair Asset Management, *503LLC, brought an- action to quiet title on property for which it held a tax sale certificate .acquired .during the 2010 City of Shreveport t&x sale.. The trial court ruled in favor of defendant, Michael Harris Tur-ney, finding th
Adair v. Statepublic domain
Michigan Court of Appeals · 2008-07-03 · Published · cited 2× · 760 N.W.2d 544; 279 Mich. App. 507
760 N.W.2d 544 (2008) 279 Mich. App. 507 ADAIR v. STATE of Michigan (On Second Remand). Docket No. 230858. Court of Appeals of Michigan. Submitted March 22, 2006, at Lansing. Decided July 3, 2008, at 9:00 a.m. *546 Thrun Law Firm, P.C., Bloomfield Hills (by Dennis R. Pollard and Richard E.
Doe v. Statepublic domain
Nebraska Supreme Court · 2022-10-21 · Published · cited 1× · 312 Neb. 665
Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 12/16/2022 08:05 AM CST - 665 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 312 Nebraska Reports DOE V. STATE Cite as 312 Neb. 665 John Doe, appellant, v.