Cases

SANDSTROM, Justice: [¶ 1] Chili Musselman appeals after a jury found her guilty of possession of methamphetamine with intent to deliver. On appeal, she argues a Fourth Amendment violation because the police officers who arrested her did not have reasonable grounds to stop and question her. ■ Because there was reasonable suspicion to stop her, the order denying the motion to supp

Filed 6/7/16 by Clerk of Supreme Court IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2016 ND 111 State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Chili Carlene Musselman, Defenda

Appellate Case: 25-4124 Document: 71-1 Date Filed: 06/30/2026 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS June 30, 2026

[Cite as State v. Musselman, 2013-Ohio-1584.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY STATE OF OHIO Plaintiff-Appellee v. MARK D. MUSSELMAN Defendant-Appellant Appellate Case No. 25295 Trial Court Case No. 2005-CR-5085/1 (Criminal Appeal from (Common Pleas Court) ...........

By Judge J. Overton Harris Before the court is Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment. The court heard argument on August 1, 2013, and took the matter under advisement. Following a thorough review of the pleadings and the law, the court finds as follows. I. Background This case stems from an incident occurring on June 26, 2009. On July 5, 2009, Defendant made a complaint to the po

ORDER JOHN ANTOON II, District Judge. This matter is an appeal1 from rulings in two bankruptcy court adversary pro*880ceedings following a bench trial. Appellants are Dartlin J. Africh (“Mr. Africh”), Africh Maintenance, Inc. (“Africh Maintenance”), and Africh Management & Investment, Inc. (“Africh Management”) (col

OPINION {¶ 1} Mark Musselman appeals from his conviction and sentence on one count of engaging in a pattern of corrupt activity, one count of aggravated theft by deception, and numerous counts of forgery involving a value of more than $100,000, forgery involving a value of between $5,000 and $100,000, and tampering with government *Page 2 records.

222 F.Supp.2d 792 (2002) BANK OF AMERICA, the Recovery Group, as Receiver for Educational Credit Services, Inc., Educational Credit Services, LLC and Related Entities, Plaintiffs, v. Gary MUSSELMAN, Catherine Musselman, Robert Hacker, Richard Baum, James Miller, Sr., Bowling, Franklin & Co., LLP, Defendants. No. CIV.A.02-253-A. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Alexandria Division.</

240 F.Supp.2d 547 (2003) BANK OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. Gary MUSSELMAN, Bowling, Franklin & Co., LLP, Defendants. No. CIV.A.02-253-A. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Alexandria Division. January 13, 2003. *548 S. Ricardo Narvaiz, Fairfax, VA, for Plaintiff. Michael Joseph McManus, Brian Arthur Coleman, Dri

668 N.W.2d 418 (2003) 257 Mich. App. 477 PANHANDLE EASTERN PIPE LINE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Virgil MUSSELMAN and Margaret Musselman, Defendants-Appellees. Docket No. 237106. Court of Appeals of Michigan. Submitted May 6, 2003, at Lansing. Decided May 20, 2003. Approved for publication July 10, 2003, at 9:00 a.m

2024 UT App 143 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS DAVID MUSSELMAN, Appellant, v. KAMRON KEELE, Appellee. Opinion No. 20220893-CA Filed October 10, 2024 Third District Court, West Jordan Department The Honorable Matthew Bates

Birdsong, Presiding Judge. Applicant has failed to carry his burden of demonstrating tha his application should be granted, within the meaning of Harper v. Harper, 259 Ga. 246 (378 SE2d 673); accordingly, his application fo discretionary appeal is denied. However, examination of the order c the trial court reveals a procedural deficiency in that said order doe not contain a specific finding as to the conduct that au

524 So.2d 90 (1988) Winona Ann Foster MUSSELMAN v. Robert J. MUSSELMAN. No. CA 8881. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit. April 12, 1988. H. Craig Cabral, Cabral & Cabral, Metairie, for appellant. Philip R. Riegel, Jr., Parlongue and Riegel, New Orleans, for appellee. Before BYRNES, CIACCIO and PLOTKIN, JJ. CIACCIO, Judge. Pl

381 B.R. 359 (2007) In re ENERGY SMART, INC., Debtor. Energy Smart, Inc. St. Petersburg, Plaintiff, v. Carla P. Musselman, Trustee, Defendant. Carla P. Musselman, Trustee, Plaintiff, v. Evgeny Lykosov, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 6:05-bk-01303-ABB. Adversary Nos. 6:06-ap-00108-ABB, 6:06-ap-00166-ABB. United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida, Orlando Division.

439 N.W.2d 781 (1989) 232 Neb. 159 Richard L. CORMAN, Appellee and Cross-Appellant, v. Diane MUSSELMAN, Appellant and Cross-Appellee. No. 87-744. Supreme Court of Nebraska. May 19, 1989. *783 Donald W. Pederson, North Platte, and Terrance O. Waite, Gordon, of Murphy, Pederson, Piccolo & Pederson, North

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ Nos. 25-1917, 25-1918 & 25-1919 JANE DOE 1, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. STEVEN V. SLOAN, et al., Defendants-Appellees. ____________________ Appeals from the United States Distri

157 B.R. 1 (1993) In re FINLEY, KUMBLE, WAGNER, HEINE, UNDERBERG, MANLEY, MYERSON & CASEY, Debtor. Lynn REDGRAVE, John Clark and Kellybee Enterprises, Inc., Claimants-Appellants, v. Francis H. MUSSELMAN, Chapter 11 Trustee of the Estate of Finley, Kumble, Wagner, Heine, Underberg, Manley, Myerson & Casey, Debtor, Appellee. Lynn REDGRAVE, Defendant-Appellant, v. Francis H. MUSSELMAN, Chapter 11 Trustee, of the Estate of Fin

667 P.2d 1061 (1983) STATE of Utah, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. D. John MUSSELMAN, Defendant and Respondent. No. 17380. Supreme Court of Utah. June 21, 1983. *1063 David L. Wilkinson, Atty. Gen., Robert R. Wallace, Craig L. Barlow, Asst. Attys. Gen., Salt Lake City, for plaintiff and appellant. Phil L. Hansen, Salt Lake Ci

267 S.E.2d 164 (1980) John Thorpe RICHARDS, Ancillary Admr., etc., et al. v. Robert M. MUSSELMAN, Executor, etc., et al. Record No. 780954. Supreme Court of Virginia. June 6, 1980. *165 Leigh B. Middleditch, Jr., Charlottesville (Roger S. Martin, McGuire, Woods & Battle, Charlottesville, on briefs), for appellants. Pau

483 Pa. 245 (1979) 396 A.2d 625 COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania v. Martin T. MUSSELMAN, Appellant. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Argued September 19, 1978. Decided January 24, 1979. *246 *247 John Woodcock, Jr., Public Defender, Hollidaysburg, for appellant. Thomas