⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Doe 14 v. Trump”

Stone v. Trumppublic domain
District Court, D. Maryland · 2018-11-30 · Published · cited 31× · 356 F. Supp. 3d 505
A. Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Order 1. Standard of Review Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(a), a district court "must consider timely objections" to a USMJ's order on nondispositive, pretrial matters and "modify or set aside any part of the order that is clearly erroneous or is contrary to law." "The 'clearly erroneous' standard applies to factu
Lovitky v. Trumppublic domain
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018-04-10 · Published · cited 0× · 308 F. Supp. 3d 250
An appropriate Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.
District Court, N.D. California · 2018-11-30 · Published · cited 0× · 354 F. Supp. 3d 1085
Because the Court's temporary restraining order concluded that the Immigration Organizations had established serious questions going to the merits of their notice-and-comment claims, ECF No. 43 at 27-29, it follows that Defendants also have shown serious questions going to the merits. Cf. Leiva-Perez , 640 F.3d at 970 (expla
Doe v. Trumppublic domain
District Court, District of Columbia · 2019-09-13 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JANE DOE 2, et al., Plaintiffs v. Civil Action No. 17-1597 (CKK) MARK T. ESPER, et al., Defendants MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER (September 13, 2019) The Court has considered Plaintiffs’ [213-1] Motion to Compel Production of Docume
District Court, S.D. New York · 2016-03-23 · Published · cited 1× · 175 F. Supp. 3d 103; 26 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 705; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 51061; 2016 WL 1544740
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ANALISA TORRES, District Judge Plaintiff, Alexia Palmer, brings this putative class action against Defendants, Trump Model Management, LLC (“Trump”), Corinne Nicolas,1 President of Trump, and John or Jane Doe, CEO of Tramp, alleging violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act, the Immigration and Nationality Act, and the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt
Doe v. Trumppublic domain
District Court, District of Columbia · 2018-08-24 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JANE DOE 2, et al., Plaintiffs v. Civil Action No. 17-1597 (CKK) JAMES N. MATTIS, et al., Defendants MEMORANDUM OPINION (August 24, 2018) On July 26, 2017, President Donald J. Trump issued a statement via Twitter announcing that “the
Doe v. Trumppublic domain
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018-08-06 · Published · cited 1× · 315 F. Supp. 3d 474
COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, United States District Judge On July 26, 2017, President Donald J. Trump issued a statement via Twitter announcing that "the United States Government will not accept or allow transgender individuals to serve in any capacity in the U.S. Military." A formal Presidential Memorandum followed on August 25, 2017. Before the 2017 Presidential Memorandum, the Department of Defense had announced that openly transgende
Doe v. Trumppublic domain
District Court, District of Columbia · 2018-11-30 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JANE DOE 2, et al., Plaintiffs v. Civil Action No. 17-1597 (CKK) JAMES MATTIS, et al., Defendants ORDER (November 30, 2018) Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Stay the Preliminary Injunction Pendi
Doe v. Trumppublic domain
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018-08-06 · Published · cited 0× · 319 F. Supp. 3d 539
COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, United States District Judge *540On July 26, 2017, President Donald J. Trump issued a statement via Twitter announcing that "the United States Government will not accept or allow transgender individuals to serve in any capacity in the U.S. Military." This lawsuit followed. On October 30, 2017, the Court issued a preliminary injunction, the effect
Doe v. Trumppublic domain
District Court, W.D. Washington · 2017-12-23 · Published · cited 4× · 288 F. Supp. 3d 1045
JAMES L. ROBART, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION The work of this court, and more broadly of the federal Judiciary, is to resolve disputes between parties; that is what the court endeavors to do today in ruling on the two motions before it. Plaintiffs in both cases are refugees, who find themselves in dire circumstances, their family members who yearn to be reunited with them, and hum
Doe v. Trumppublic domain
District Court, District of Columbia · 2018-08-06 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JANE DOE 2, et al., Plaintiffs v. Civil Action No. 17-1597 (CKK) DONALD J. TRUMP, et al., Defendants MEMORANDUM OPINION (August 6, 2018) On July 26, 2017, President Donald J. Trump issued a statement via Twitter anno
Doe v. Trumppublic domain
District Court, District of Columbia · 2018-08-06 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JANE DOE 2, et al., Plaintiffs v. Civil Action No. 17-1597 (CKK) DONALD J. TRUMP, et al., Defendants MEMORANDUM OPINION (August 6, 2018) On July 26, 2017, President Donald J. Trump issued a statement via Twitter announcing that “the U
Doe v. Trumppublic domain
District Court, W.D. Washington · 2018-01-09 · Published · cited 1× · 284 F. Supp. 3d 1172
JAMES L. ROBART, United States District Judge *1175I. INTRODUCTION Before the court is Defendants Donald Trump, United States Department of State, Rex Tillerson, United States Department of Homeland Security ("DHS"), United States Customs and Border Protection, Kevin McAleenan, Michele James, Office of the Director of Natio
Doe v. Trumppublic domain
District Court, W.D. Washington · 2018-07-27 · Published · cited 2× · 328 F. Supp. 3d 1185
JAMES L. ROBART, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION Before the court are two motions: (1) Consolidated Plaintiffs Jewish Family Services of Seattle, Jewish Family Services of Silicon Valley, Allen Vaught, Afkab Mohamed Hussein, John Does 1-3 and 7, and Jane Does 4-6's (collectively, "JFS Plaintiffs") motion to reinstate their request for limited discovery1 (2
Doe v. Trumppublic domain
District Court, District of Columbia · 2017-10-30 · Published · cited 33× · 275 F. Supp. 3d 167
MEMORANDUM OPINION (October 30, 2017) COLLEEN KÓLLAR-KOTELLY, United States District Judge . On July 26, 2017, President Donald, J. Trump,issued a statement via Twitter announcing that “the United States Government will not accept or allow transgender individuals to serve in any capa
Doe v. Trump Corp.public domain
District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019-07-24 · Published · cited 11× · 385 F. Supp. 3d 265
LORNA G. SCHOFIELD, District Judge: This case concerns an alleged fraudulent scheme to promote certain third-party companies offering multi-level marketing and training programs. The Amended Complaint (the "Complaint") asserts racketeering and conspiracy claims under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1
Trump v. Trumppublic domain
New York Supreme Court, New York County · 2025-05-20 · Published · cited 1× · 2025 NY Slip Op 25118
Trump v Trump (2025 NY Slip Op 25118) [*1] Trump v Trump 2025 NY Slip Op 25118 Decided on May 20, 2025 Supreme Court, New York County Reed, J. Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to J
Trump v. Trumppublic domain
New York Supreme Court, New York County · 2025-05-20 · Published · cited 1× · 2025 NY Slip Op 25118
Trump v Trump (2025 NY Slip Op 25118) [*1] Trump v Trump 2025 NY Slip Op 25118 Decided on May 20, 2025 Supreme Court, New York County Reed, J. Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to J
Carroll v. Trumppublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2025-09-08 · Published · cited 0×
24-644 Carroll v. Trump UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term 2024 (Argued: June 24, 2025 Decided: September 8, 2025) Docket No. 24-644 E. JEAN CARROLL, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee,
Trump v. Trumppublic domain
New York Supreme Court · 2023-06-09 · Published · cited 0×
Trump v Trump (2023 NY Slip Op 23180) [*1] Trump v Trump 2023 NY Slip Op 23180 Decided on June 9, 2023 Supreme Court, New York County Reed, J. Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to J