Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Dixon v. Reed”
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ No. 1D2023-0505 _____________________________ WILLIAM J. REED, Appellant, v. RICKY D. DIXON, Secretary, Fla. Dept. of Corrections, Appellee. _____________________________ On appeal from the Circuit Court for Wakulla County. J. Layne Smith, Judge. August 7, 2024 PER C
State v. Dixonpublic domain
Berger, J. In this case, we consider the extent to which a circuit court may dictate the conditions of detention for an individual who is awaiting a psychological examination to determine his or her competency to stand trial and his or her criminal responsibility for the charged offenses under Maryland Code (2001, 2008 Repl. Vol., 2015 Supp.) §§ 3-105 and 3-1
United States v. James Dixonpublic domain
OPINION BEA, Circuit Judge: James Dixon pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). Upon conviction, and at sentencing, the district court found that Dixon had three prior convictions for “violent felonies,” as defined by the Armed Career Criminal Act (“ACCA”), 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(2)(B): two robber
United States v. Dixonpublic domain
648 F.3d 195 (2011) UNITED STATES of America v. Kenneth DIXON, Appellant. No. 10-4300. United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. Argued May 24, 2011. Filed: August 9, 2011. *196 John H. Reed, Selinsgrove, PA, Brett G. Sweitzer, (Argued), Defender Association of Philadelphia, Federal Court Division, Philadelp
Reed v. Statepublic domain
674 S.E.2d 406 (2009) REED v. The STATE. No. A08A2282. Court of Appeals of Georgia. March 2, 2009. *407 Willie J. Reed, pro se. Jewel C. Scott, District Attorney, Billy J. Dixon, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee. BARNES, Judge. Proceeding pro se, Willie James Reed appeals from the order of the
Reed v. Dixonpublic domain
153 Ga. App. 604 (1980) 266 S.E.2d 286 REED v. DIXON. 59070. Court of Appeals of Georgia. Argued January 7, 1980. Decided February 26, 1980. Gerald S. Mullis, for appellant. Robert S. Slocumb, for appellee. CARLEY, Judge. Suit was instituted seeking recovery of general and special damages fo
People v. Dixonpublic domain
Filed 6/24/25 CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION* IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SEVEN THE PEOPLE, B335987 Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. KA069348) v. JAMES WINSLOW DIXON, Defendant and Appellant. APPEAL from an order of the Superior Cour
State v. Dixonpublic domain
GOOLSBY, Judge: Tammy Lynn Dixon appeals her conviction for first degree burglary, arguing the trial court erred in refusing her motion for a directed verdict. We affirm. FACTS This case arises from the attack and robbery of a sixty-four year-old retired, deaf widower (“Victim”) in his home. The State presented testimony that Dixon, her brother, and Bobby Caughman decided to go to Victim’s
River City Brewing Co. v. Dixonpublic domain
PER CURIAM. Having considered the appellant’s response to this Court’s order to show cause, dated January 31, 2005, the appeal of the “Order on Defendant’s Motion for Remitti-tur,” entered on November 24, 2004, is hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.130(a)(4); Fire & Casualty Ins. Co. of Connecticut v. Sealey, 810 So.2d 988, 991 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002).
Dixon v. River City Brewing Co.public domain
POLSTON, J. Appellant Neil Dixon obtained a jury verdict in this slip and fall ease against appellee River City Brewing Company. The trial court ruled on various post-trial motions, and reasoning that the testimony of Dixon’s expert witness was inadmissible and that he should not have been allowed to testify, set aside the jury verdict, granted River City’s motion for directed verdict, and entered judgment in favor of River
State v. Reedpublic domain
[Cite as State v. Reed, 2023-Ohio-1324.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT ASHTABULA COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, CASE NO. 2022-A-0082 Plaintiff-Appellee, Criminal Appeal from the - vs - Court of Common Pleas KASSANDRA REED,
Robinson v. Reedpublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE AUSTIN ROBINSON, SR.,1 § § No. 133, 2022 Respondent Below, § Appellant, § Court Below—Family Court § of the State of Delaware v. § § File
State v. Reedpublic domain
[Cite as State v. Reed, 2022-Ohio-3986.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO, : APPEAL NO. C-200104 TRIAL NO. B-1902448 Plaintiff-Appellee, : : O P I N I O N. VS.
State v. Reedpublic domain
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE STATE OF DELAWARE ) ) ) Def. I.D. # 1809015387 v. ) ) ) JERRY REED, ) ) Defendant. ) Submitted: June 17, 202
Reed v. Statepublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE § JERRY REED, § § No. 214, 2020 Defendant-Below, § Appellant, § § Court Below: Superior Court v. § of the State of Delaware § STATE OF DELAWARE, §
State v. Reedpublic domain
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE STATE OF DELAWARE, : ID No. 1809015387 V. JERRY REED, SBI: 00480004 DOB: 12/06/1991 Submitted: May 27, 2020 Decided: June 4, 2020 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER UPON DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO WITHDRAW PLEAS: DENIED MOTION FOR POSTCONVICTION RELIEF: DENIED MOTION FOR MODIFICATION OF SENTENCE: DENIED Jerry Reed, Defendant, James T. Vaughn Correctional Center, 1181 Paddock Road, Smyrna, Delaware 19977 Caroline Brittingham, Esquire and Nichole Gannett
State v. Reedpublic domain
IN THE ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION ONE STATE OF ARIZONA, Appellee, v. RICHARD ALLEN REED, Appellant. No. 1 CA-CR 17-0620 FILED 10-20-2020 Appeal from the Superior Court in Maricopa County No. CR2015-117844-001 The Honorable Dan
Reed v. Statepublic domain
Opinion by Justice Moseley Deion Reed and Torry Jamal Reed were both implicated in the murder of Deaundray Rossum. A Gregg County jury convicted Deion of one count of murder and one count of aggravated robbery. On each count, Deion was sentenced to sixty years' imprisonment and was ordered to pay a $10,000.00 fine. On appeal, Deion argues (1) that the trial court erred in failing to include an accomplice-witness instruction
State v. Dixonpublic domain
[Cite as State v. Dixon, 2015-Ohio-208.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LAKE COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO, : OPINION Plaintiff-Appellee, : CASE NO. 2013-L-103 - vs - : JAMEY D. DIXON,
Reed v. Chrysler Corp.public domain
494 N.W.2d 224 (1993) Jeffrey K. REED, Appellant, v. CHRYSLER CORPORATION, Appellee. No. 91-423. Supreme Court of Iowa. December 23, 1992. Rehearing Denied February 18, 1993. *225 Dan Fontaine of Onstad, Kaiser & Fontaine, Houston, TX, and Lance A. Grotewold of Heslinga, Heslinga, Dixon & Grotewold, Oskal