Cases

OPINION & ORDER PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, District Judge. Plaintiff Nadgia Dixon brings this action on her own behalf and on behalf of a *393putative class of employees of defendants NBCUniversal Media, LLC (“NBCU”) and Oxygen Media, LLC (“Oxygen”), alleging that defendants failed to compensate her for overtime wages, in violation of the F

03/31/2026 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE October 8, 2025 Session WILLIAM H. LUBLIN V. VASTLAND NORTHCREST DEVELOPMENT, LLC Appeal from the Chancery Court for Davidson County No. 22-0737-II Anne C. Martin, Chancellor No. M2024

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION ALVIN K. HELLERSTEIN, U.S.D.J.: Plaintiff David Weiss (“Weiss”) brought this action under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C. § 12191 et seq, against his employer, defendant Macy’s Retail Holdings Inc. (“Macy’s”). Weiss alleges that his employer harassed him because of his learning disability, failed to accommodate

IRENAS, Senior District Judge: Plaintiffs, service technicians for General Electric Company’s (“GE” or “Defendant”) Appliances Division, brought this putative collective action pursuant to § 216(b) of the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) to recover allegedly unpaid overtime compensation from Defendant. Currently pending before the Court is Defendant’s motion to compel arbitration of claims asserted by two o

OPINION AND ORDER JOHN G. KOELTL, District Judge: The plaintiff, Michael Isaacs, brings this action against the defendant, Océ Business Services, Inc. (“OBS”), under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq., and the New York Labor Law (“NYLL”), N.Y. Lab. Law § 650 et seq. The plaintiff claims he is entitled to unpaid overtime compensation for work

REVISED OCTOBER 20, 2016 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 4, 2016 No. 16-40057

KING, Circuit Judge: Plaintiff-Appellee Carlos Reyna brought an action on his own behalf and on behalf of other similarly situated individuals against his former employer, Defendant-Appellant International Bank of Commerce, contending that IBC violated the Fair Labor Standards Act by failing to pay proper overtime rates. IBC moved to compel arbitration of Reyna’s claim, but the di

PHILIP A. BRIMMER, United States District Judge ORDER This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion for Approval of Hoffmann-La Roche Notice [Docket No. 62], Defendant Fishbone Safety Solutions, Ltd.'s Motion to Compel Arbitration as to Charles Young [Docket No. 73], Defendants William S. Cain and BSC Interest, LLC's Conditional Motion to Compel Arbitration as to Michael Green and Ch

*141RULING ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS Alvin W. Thompson, United States District Judge The plaintiff brings this action in response to statements published in a news article about an employment action brought by the plaintiff against his former employer and others. The complaint has two counts: defamation (Count I) and punitive damages (Count II).

MEMORANDUM — DECISION and ORDER DAVID N. HURD, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Named plaintiff John Horanzy (“Horan-zy” or “plaintiff’) filed this putative class action against defendants Vemma Nutrition Company (“Vemma”); its President *344and Chief Executive Officer, Benson K. Boreyko (“Boreyko”); an

OPINION AND ORDER JOHN G. KOELTL, District Judge: The plaintiff, Kristin Rightnour, sued Tiffany and Company (“Tiffany”) for religious discrimination and retaliation under federal and local law. Tiffany petitions for an order to stay this action and compel the plaintiff to arbitrate the dispute pursuant to the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”), 9 U.S.C. §§ 3, 4. This Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.

MEMORANDUM & ORDER VITALIANO, District Judge. Plaintiffs, current and former car salesmen employed by The Major Automotive Company (“Major”) and affiliated entities, bring suit on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated against Major and three individual defendants, Bruce Bendell, Harold Bendell, and Christopher Orsaris, alleging various unfair labor practices. In particular, plai

MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDER DAVID N. HURD, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION In October 2010, plaintiff Charles M. Croons (“Croons” or “plaintiff’) filed this discrimination lawsuit against the New York State Office of Mental Health’s Central New York Psychiatric Center (“CNYPC”) and several of its current and former employees. Plaintiffs operative complaint enumerated

PER CURIAM: The question presented in this appeal is whether an employee can invalidate a class-action waiver provision in an arbitration agreement when that waiver removes the financial incentive for her to pursue a claim under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 201, et seq. In light of the supervening decision of the Supreme Court in

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION CYNTHIA BASHANT, District Judge. Plaintiffs Andrea Fagerstrom (“Fager-strom”) and Allen Wiseley (‘Wiseley”) filed this putative class action against Defendant Amazon.com, Inc. (“Amazon”) alleging California state law claims related to false advertising and unfair business practices. (ECF No. 1, Attach. 3) The suit was originally filed in state cou

ROVNER, Circuit Judge. This appeal casts a harsh light on some of the darkest corners of life in Chicago. The plaintiff, at the time of the events giving rise to this suit, was a general in the El Rukn street gang, out on parole for a murder conviction, when he became embroiled in a second murder. Among the defendants are several disgraced police officers, including the infamo

OPINION DEBORAH A. BATTS, District Judge. Plaintiff Nzingha M. Kellman (“Plaintiff’ or “Kellman”), an African-American female, together with eight African-American plaintiffs and one Hispanic plaintiff, all of whom are current or former employees of the Metropolitan Transportation Authority (“MTA”) Police Department (“MTA PD”), commenced this action against the MTA and four MTA executive office

OPINION DEBORAH A. BATTS, District Judge. Plaintiff Maria Villar (“Plaintiff’ or “Vil-lar”), a Hispanic female, brings this employment discrimination action against the City of New York, Deputy Inspector Michael Yanosik, and Lieutenant John P. McGovern (collectively, “Defendants”) pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., the New York State Human