⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

4 opinions for “Dittimus v. No Named”

District Court, D. New Jersey · 2007-07-31 · Published · cited 1× · 244 F.R.D. 284; 68 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1308; 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 55294; 2007 WL 2212852
OPINION SIMANDLE, District Judge. This matter comes before Court on a motion for class certification, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 23(a) and 23(b)(2). For the reasons stated in this Opinion, the Court shall grant the motion and certify a class of all individuals incarcerated at the Camden County Correctional Facility, either as pretrial detainees or as convicted prisoners, from the incepti
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2008-03-13 · Published · cited 0× · 248 F.R.D. 470; 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20425; 2008 WL 706688
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER PADOVA, District Judge. Plaintiffs, individuals with mobility disabilities who are registered to vote in the City of Philadelphia, have brought this action against the Philadelphia Board of Elections and the Commissioners of the City of Philadelphia in charge of elections, alleging that Defendants have violated their civil rights under Title II of the Americans with Disabil
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010-10-08 · Published · cited 1× · 270 F.R.D. 208; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 108575; 2010 WL 3986104
MEMORANDUM R. BARCLAY SURRICK, District Judge. Presently before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion For Class Certification (ECF. No. 2). For the following reasons, the Motion will be granted. I. BACKGROUND This is a putative class action for injunctive and declaratory relief in which Plaintiffs, who were inmates in the Philadelphia Prison System (the “PPS”) when
District Court, C.D. California · 2016-03-18 · Published · cited 1× · 171 F. Supp. 3d 961; 2016 WL 1070650; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35479
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; AND DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Docket Nos. 120, 139 EDWARD M. CHEN, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION The instant action is brought on behalf of a certified class of adult immigration detainees who are or will be held by Defendant United States Immigra