Cases

Notice: This opinion is subject to correction before publication in the PACIFIC REPORTER. Readers are requested to bring errors to the attention of the Clerk of the Appellate Courts, 303 K Street, Anchorage, Alaska 99501, phone (907) 264-0608, fax (907) 264-0878, email corrections@akcourts.gov. THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ALASKA TUYEN DINH, ) ) Supreme Court

HALL, Circuit Judge: This case concerns a lease (“the Lease”) and a purported joint venture agreement (“the Joint Venture Agreement”) entered into between a son and his father, the now-deceased former president and majority shareholder of a real estate development *149corporation. The Lease grants the son, defendant-counter-plaintiff-appellant Nam T. Tran (“Nam”), con

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON AJI P., a minor child by and through his guardian HELAINA No. 80007-8-I PIPER; ADONIS W., a minor child, by and through his guardian DIVISION ONE HELAINA PIPER; WREN W., a minor child by and through her PUBLISHED OPINION guardian MIKE WAGENBACH; LARA F. & ATHENA F., minor children by and through their guardian MONIQUE DINH; GABRIEL M., a minor child by and through his guardians VALERY and RANDY MAN

MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER PAUL G. GARDEPHE, District Judge: Gregory L. Shields, G.E. Stricklin, and Iron Workers Mid-South Pension Fund (“Iron Workers”) have filed shareholder derivative actions against a group of News Corporation directors and officers (collectively, the “News Corp. Defendants”) alleging, inter alia, violations of Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 193

14‐3447‐cv Alphonse Hotel Corporation v. Tran 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 2 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 3 4 August Term, 2015 5 6 (Submitted: November 4, 2015 Decided: July 11, 2016) 7 8

32 Cal.Rptr.3d 656 (2005) 131 Cal.App.4th 1291 IBM PERSONAL PENSION PLAN, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO et al., Defendants and Respondents. City and County of San Francisco, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Assessment Appeals Board of the City and County of San Francisco, Defendant; IBM Personal Pension Plan, Real Party in Interest and Respondent. No. A107090.

510 F.Supp.2d 763 (2007) Harry ARMITAGE and Thomas Armitage, Plaintiffs, v. DOLPHIN PLUMBING & MECHANICAL, LLC. and Ralph Parrot, Defendants. Nos. 6:05-cv-0890-Orl-19KRS, 6:05-cv-0891-Orl-19DAB. United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Orlando Division. February 13, 2007. *764 *765 Char

901 So.2d 559 (2005) John LAM, A Minor, Through Thom LAM In His Capacity as the Administrator of the Estate of His Minor Child, John Lam v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Thomas Perino, Mildred Perino Individually and as the Administrator of the Estate of Thomas Perino, Salvador Perino Individually and as the Administrator of the Estate of Thomas Perino, et al. Thom Lam and Hue Nguyen v. State Farm Mutual Automobile I

630 F.3d 102 (2010) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Hassan ABU-JIHAAD, also known as Paul R. Hall, Defendant-Appellant.[*] Docket Nos. 09-1375-cr (L), 09-1384-cr (XAP). United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Submitted: April 29, 2010. Decided: December 20, 2010. *108 Dan E. LaBelle, Hal

Affirmed and remanded in part by published opinion. Judge WIDENER wrote the opinion, in which Chief Judge WILKINSON and Judge RUSSELL concur. OPINION WIDENER, Circuit Judge: Claude and Daniel Guay, both French-speaking Canadians, appeal their convictions following a three-day jury trial. The jury found each defendant guilty of one co

679 F.3d 205 (2012) Suhail Najim Abdullah AL SHIMARI; Taha Yaseen Arraq Rashid; Sa'ad Hamza Hantoosh Al-Zuba'e; Salah Hasan Nusaif Jasim Al-Ejaili, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. CACI INTERNATIONAL, INCORPORATED; CACI Premier Technology, Incorporated, Defendants-Appellants. Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Incorporated, Amicus Supporting Appellants, Professors of Civil Procedure and Federal Courts, Erwin Chemerinsky, Dean and Distinguished Pr

ORDER BERMAN, District Judge. I. Background On March 22, 2001, Plaintiffs Edward and Brian Holland and four (4) Delaware limited partnerships and corporations (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) commenced an action against Defendants Fahnestock & Co, Inc. (“Fahnes-tock”), David Pullman (“Pullman”), Mazuma Capital, Inc. (“Mazuma”), and Tom Ghyczy (“Ghyczy”) (collectivel

SELYA, Senior Circuit Judge. This appeal has its genesis in a dramatic raid on a leather goods factory in New Bedford, Massachusetts. Enforcement of the immigration laws is difficult and oftentimes controversial work. So it was here: the raid led to the detention of hundreds of undocumented aliens and put significant strains on those involved and those who wished to help. In short

986 F.Supp. 385 (1997) UNITED STATES of America v. Richard D. BARNETT (001), Virgil R. Drake (002). No. CRIM. 97-60033. United States District Court, W.D. Louisiana, Lafayette-Opelousas Division. September 17, 1997. *386 *387 Terry Hart, Akin Gump, Hauer & Feld, Dallas, TX, Kraig T. Streng

803 F.Supp. 710 (1992) KAM SHING CHAN, Kam Tai Chan, Jing Yi Chen, Shan Non Chiu, Bak Lok Chu, Kok Kun Chu, Israel Gonzalez, Sui Bin Huang, Jian Ning Jiang, Kam Fai Kwok, Moon Shuen Kwong, Wei Xiang Lee, Yang I Lee, Young Shi Lee, Bing Zhao Li, Hao Hui Li, Kei Man Li, Wai Tai Li, Chi Kwong Liu, Jack Ye Louie, Sheng Hua Lu, Ting Guang Mai, Cheuk Ming Ng, Kin Chung Ng, Kin Hin Ng, Shun Guo Shen, Ten Jen Shen, Hau Wing Sin, Vein Dinh Sintruong, Wing Shing T

BALDWIN, Circuit Judge. This is an appeal by E.I. du Pont De Nemours & Co. and its customer Alamo Explosives Co., Inc. (collectively, “Du Pont”). The appeal is from a final judgment of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas holding product claims 1-5, 7, 12-14, and 16-17 of U.S. Patent No. 3,447,97

ACCEPTED 03-15-00085-CV 5176028 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

449 F.Supp.2d 992 (2006) Barbara SCHWAB et al., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC., R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., Lorillard Tobacco Co., Ligget Group, Inc., American Tobacco Co., Altria Group, Inc., British American Tobacco (Investments) Ltd., Defendants. No. 04-CV-1945(JBW). United States District Court

80 F.Supp.2d 164 (2000) In re AUSTRIAN AND GERMAN BANK HOLOCAUST LITIGATION. This Document Relates to All Actions. No. 98 Civ. 3938 SWK. United States District Court, S.D. New York. January 6, 2000. *165 *166 *167 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER <

OPINION FLETCHER, Judge: By this suit, brought under the Renegotiation Act of 1951 (50 U.S.C.App. §§ 1211-1233), as amended, the plaintiff, Equipment, Inc., seeks a de novo determination that the profits it realized from five Government contracts for trucking services for the period 1966 to 1968 were not excessive. The petition was filed following a ruling by the Renegotiation Board that the plai