⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

4 opinions for “Dinita Jones”

Payne v. Stalleypublic domain
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995-09-29 · Published · cited 0× · 672 So. 2d 822; 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 10200; 1995 WL 570552
ALTENBERND, Judge. These consolidated appeals arise from the unsuccessful attempts of Priscilla M. Payne and her children (the Paynes) to file two claims in the probate estate of Richard M. Wood (the Estate). Although the result seems harsh, we affirm the probate court’s order denying leave to amend the first claim and its order denying an extension of time in which to file, a second claim. We cannot rewrite Florida probate la
District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1994-09-21 · Published · cited 8× · 864 F. Supp. 556; 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14312; 1994 WL 549581
864 F.Supp. 556 (1994) Patrick L. RIVERS and Belinda Rae Autin Rivers v. INTERNATIONAL MATEX TANK TERMINAL, et al. Civ.A. No. 94-2379. United States District Court, E.D. Louisiana. September 21, 1994. *557 J.J. (Jerry) McKernan, McKernan, Friedman & Gold, Baton Rouge, LA, George John Nalley, Jr., Piper Dinita Griffin, David A
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993-12-01 · Published · cited 0× · 627 So. 2d 1230; 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 12009; 1993 WL 496044
PER CURIAM. In this maritime personal injury action, defendant Juneau Tanker Corporation raises two points on appeal. Plaintiff Raymond C. Sims cross-appeals, arguing that the trial court erred in denying his motion for attorney’s fees. We affirm both points on the main appeal but reverse on the cross-appeal. With regard to defendant’s first point on appeal, we conclude that the trial court, in grantin
Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2018-06-07 · Published · cited 0× · 418 P.3d 426
IN THE ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION ONE BRUSH & NIB STUDIO, LC, et al., Plaintiffs/Appellants/Cross-Appellees, v. CITY OF PHOENIX, Defendant/Appellee/Cross-Appellant. No. 1 CA-CV 16-0602 FILED 6-7-2018 Appeal from the Superior Court in Maricopa County No. CV2016-