Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Dimensions in Senior Living, LLC”
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 24-0493 Filed July 23, 2025 CHAMPION CONTRACTORS & SERVICES-COMMERCIAL, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant, vs. DIMENSIONS SENIOR LIVING, d/b/a VILLAGE PLACE, LLC, DIMENSIONS IN SENIOR LIVING d/b/a VILLAGE RIDGE, LLC, TAPESTRY SENIOR LIVING OF MARION, LLC, VILLAGE PLACE, LLC, VILLAGE RIDGE, LLC, and RYAN BURNS, Defendants-Appellees. ________________________________________
Notice: This opinion is subject to correction before publication in the PACIFIC REPORTER. Readers are requested to bring errors to the attention of the Clerk of the Appellate Courts, 303 K Street, Anchorage, Alaska 99501, phone (907) 264-0608, fax (907) 264-0878, email corrections@akcourts.gov. THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ALASKA BAXTER SENIOR LIVING, LLC, ) ) Supreme Court No. S-18541
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE THE FREDERICK HSU LIVING TRUST, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 12108-VCL ) OAK HILL CAPITAL PARTNERS III, L.P., ) OAK HILL CAPITAL MANAGEMENT ) PARTNERS III
Bliss Collection, LLC v. Latham Companies, LLCpublic domain
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 23a0216p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ BLISS COLLECTION, LLC dba bella bliss, │ Plaint
Stone v. CCXL, LLCpublic domain
107 Argued and submitted June 1, 2021, affirmed March 2, petition for review denied July 28, 2022 (370 Or 198) Patrick STONE and Vicki Stone, as Trustees of the Stone Family 2002 Revocable Trust, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. CCXL, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,
Gallis v. 23-21 33 Rd., LLCpublic domain
Gallis v 23-21 33 Rd., LLC (2021 NY Slip Op 05549) Gallis v 23-21 33 Rd., LLC 2021 NY Slip Op 05549 Decided on October 13, 2021 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau purs
Targetsmart Holdings, LLC v. Ghp Advisors, LLCpublic domain
DOUGLAS P. WOODLOCK, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This case arises out of an agreement between the Plaintiffs, TargetSmart Holdings, LLC and TargetSmart Communications, LLC (together, "TargetSmart"), and the Defendant, GHP Advisors, LLC, doing business as Good Harbor Partners ("GHP"), to explore opportunities for TargetSmart to partner or merge with other companies engaged in similar
Bes design/build, LLC v. United Statespublic domain
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 19-1892C Filed: November 30, 2021 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * BES DESIGN/BUILD, LLC, * * Plaintiff, * * v.
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA In re: Appeal of Chestnut Hill : Community Association, Chestnut : Hill Baptist Church, James Bruno, : Maureen Pie-Bruno, Eileen Sisle, : Kenneth Schotsch, and Devon : Cargerry : : v. : No. 1034 C.D. 2022 : Argued: April 9, 2024 City of Philadelphia Zoning Board : of Adjustmen
Sunder Energy, LLC v. Jacksonpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE SUNDER ENERGY, LLC, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2023-0988-JTL ) TYLER JACKSON, FREEDOM FOREVER ) LLC, BRETT BOUCHY, CHAD TOWNER, ) FREEDOM SOL
Sunder Energy, LLC v. Jacksonpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE SUNDER ENERGY, LLC, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2023-0988-JTL ) TYLER JACKSON, FREEDOM FOREVER ) LLC, BRETT BOUCHY, CHAD TOWNER, ) FREEDOM SOL
ECC International, LLCpublic domain
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of -- ) ) ECC International, LLC ) ASBCA No. 58875 ) Under Contract No. W917PM-07-D-0015-0006 ) APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: Michael A. Richard, Esq. Obermayer Rebmann Maxwell
Whiteyville Properties, LLCpublic domain
STATE OF VERMONT SUPERIOR COURT - ENVIRONMENTAL DIVISION { In re Whiteyville Properties, LLC { Docket No. 179-12-11 Vtec Conditional Use Application { (Appeal from Burlington DRB denial of { Application No. 12-0470CA/CU) {
In re People v. Hoskinspublic domain
CHIEF JUSTICE RICE, dissenting. £40 In July 2012, Peters Mair Wilcox ("PMW"), a Colorado-based law firm, represented several parties in connection with a criminal investigation conducted by the Colorado Department of Revenue ("DOR"). PMW represented Conley Hoskins individually; additionally, it represented two medical marijuana dispensaries in which Hoskins had an ownership stake, All Care Wellness, LLC ("All
Dixon v. 105 West 75th Street LLCpublic domain
Orders, Supreme Court, New York County (Manuel J. Mendez, J.), entered April 13, 2015 and August 11, 2015, which, respectively, granted the landlord defendants’ (landlord) motion to dismiss the complaint against them and for an award of attorneys’ fees and costs, and, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, denied plaintiff’s motion to renew, modified, on the law, to declare that the apartment at issue is a legal apartment and no longer subj
Nelle v. Who Television, LLCpublic domain
B. Libel Per Quod Count Two of the Complaint alleges Defendants defamed all Plaintiffs through the airing of a series of broadcasts stating or implying various questionable business dealings with Gregory, including alleging the unlawful altering of the price term of a home-repair contract without Gregory's knowledge or consent and seeking liquidated damages based on that price term. Under Iowa law, a plaintiff must prove fi
Sikiru Adeyeye v. Heartland Sweeteners, LLCpublic domain
HAMILTON, Circuit Judge. Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination in employment on the basis of religion. Among other consequences, the law requires a covered employer to provide a reasonable accommodation for an employee’s request te participate in a religious observance or practice if an accommodation would not cause the employer undue hardship. Plain
KOTIS ASSOCIATES, LLC v. United Statespublic domain
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 20-932 Filed: April 22, 2025 ) KOTIS ASSOCIATES, LLC, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) THE UNITED STATES,
Meade v. Avant of Colo., LLCpublic domain
(ECF No. 62 at 2-4 (citations as in original; footnote omitted).) III. LEGAL STANDARDS A. Review Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b) When a magistrate judge issues a recommendation on a dispositive matter, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b)(3) requires that the district judge "determine de novo any part of the magistrate judge's [recommendation] that has
Opinion issued December 16, 2025 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-24-01032-CV ——————————— CITY OF PASADENA, TEXAS, CITY OF PASADENA PLANNING COMMISSION, JEFF WAGNER, AND MELISSA TAMEZ, Appellants