Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
16 opinions for “Dillworth v. Rolle”
In re Ocean 4660 LLCpublic domain
ORDER SANCTIONING KENNETH A. FRANK PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1927 FOR UNREASONABLY AND VEXATIOUSLY MULTIPLYING PROCEEDINGS, DIRECTING TRUSTEE YIP TO FILE A BILL OF COSTS, ETC., FINDING KENNETH A. FRANK TO HAVE ACTED IN BAD FAITH, PROHIBITING FILINGS BY HIM, AND DIRECTING CLERK TO TAKE CERTAIN ACTIONS John K. Olson, Judge, United States Bankruptcy Court This Chapter 7 case came on for hearing before the Cour
Sapone v. Grand Targhee, Inc.public domain
HENRY, Circuit Judge. Represented by her parents, Joseph Sa-pone and Kimberly Sapone, as guardians ad litem, Daya Sapone appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Appellees, Grand Targhee, Inc. (“GT”) and Bustle Creek Outfitters (“BCO”) in this personal injury diversity suit. Daya argues that the district court erred when it found that (1) falling from a bolting horse is an inherent risk that creat
Umali v. Mount Snow Ltd.public domain
247 F.Supp.2d 567 (2003) Leandro UMALI, Plaintiff, v. MOUNT SNOW LTD, USA Cycling, Inc. National Off-Road Bicycling Association, Defendants. No. 2:01-CV-291. United States District Court, D. Vermont. February 28, 2003. *568 John Joseph Collins, Collins, McMahon & Harris, P.L.L.C, Burlington, VT, Richard P. Hackman, Esq., Geor
Sapone v. Grand Targhee, Inc.public domain
308 F.3d 1096 Joseph SAPONE and Kimberly Sapone, individually and as guardians of Daya Sapone, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.GRAND TARGHEE, INC., a Wyoming corporation, d/b/a Grand Targhee Ski and Summer Resort, and Bustle Creek Outfitters, Inc., a Wyoming corporation, Defendants-Appellees. No. 01-8021. United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. October 3, 2002.
Young v. Statepublic domain
544 S.W.2d 421 (1976) Larry Darnill YOUNG, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. No. 51991. Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas. December 22, 1976. *422 Thomas D. Wells, Paris, for appellant. James D. Vollers, State Atty., David S. McAngus, Asst. State Atty., Austin, for appellee. OPINION ONION
In Re Ocean Blue Leasehold Property LLCpublic domain
393 B.R. 792 (2008) In re OCEAN BLUE LEASEHOLD PROPERTY LLC, et al.,[1] Debtors. No. 07-17999-BKC-AJC. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida, Miami Division. September 5, 2008. *794 Arthur Halsey Rice, Rice, Pugatch, Robinson & Schiller, P.A., Ft. Lauderdale, FL, for Debtors. Lynn Maynard Gollin, Tew Cardenas
United States v. Terrence Creamerpublic domain
CUMMINGS, Circuit Judge. In December 1975, the defendant, Terrence Creamer, a Chicago police officer, was indicted along with Waroon Netisingha and Lee Martin on one count of conspiracy to distribute heroin in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846, and three substantive counts of heroin distribution in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). Bo
Hartz v. United Statespublic domain
249 F.Supp. 119 (1965) Florence Wattles HARTZ v. UNITED STATES of America. Margaret Elwyn ROTH v. UNITED STATES of America. GLOBE INDEMNITY COMPANY v. UNITED STATES of America. Civ. A. Nos. 8139-8141. United States District Court N. D. Georgia, Atlanta Division. December 29, 1965. *120 Smith, Swift, Currie
State v. Prevopublic domain
44 Haw. 665 (1961) 361 P.2d 1044 STATE OF HAWAII v. ANNIE LEE PREVO. No. 4190. Supreme Court of Hawaii. March 14, 1961. TSUKIYAMA, C.J., CASSIDY, WIRTZ, LEWIS, JJ., AND CIRCUIT JUDGE CROCKETT ASSIGNED BY REASON OF VACANCY. *666 Albert W. Evensen (Wallace S. Fujiyama with him on the bri
Nickey v. State Ex Rel. Attorney-Generalpublic domain
I am unable to agree with the majority opinion in regard to a personal liability being created by a tax assessment, and the rights of the attorney-general, on the present record, to bring suit for the ad valorem taxes due state, county, and levee district, etc. I think the assessment was a valid charge against the property attached, and the bond to discharge such judgments as the court might render would be all right, if limited to subjecting the property seized to the tax assessed thereon, <
Rogen v. Enoch Morgan's Sons' Co.public domain
Larremore, C. J. In dismissing the complaint in this action, Judge Bookstaver used the following language: “It is manifest that if the deceased had approached the elevator well in any ordinary way, the bar protecting the well would have been quite sufficient to prevent his falling in it. The accident happened by reason of the giving way of a part of the machine by which the deceased was attempting to move it. This portion of the
Chielinsky v. Hoopes & Townsend Co.public domain
Lore, C. J. The contention as we understand it is that either by order or by permission—the defendant looking on and consenting—this boy went up and put on this belt, that being dangerous work. Whatever took place in that boy’s presence by the defendant’s order or permission during the time that he worked there and of which he had knowledge and which informed his mind as to his duty and his rights is clearly
Duggan v. Heaphypublic domain
Haselton, J. The plaintiff worked for the defendant in the laundry of his hotel and received an injury by having her hand drawn into a power mangle while she was operating *518it. The action is case for negligence. The cause was tried by jury. Verdict and judgment were for the plaintiff. The defendant excepted. The mangle in question, as the testimony t
Houston Belt & Terminal Railway Co. v. Stephenspublic domain
Questions certified from the Court of Civil Appeals of the Eighth Supreme Judicial District of Texas, in an appeal from the District Court of Harris County. This case is before us on the following certificate of the Court of Civil Appeals, towit: "This was a suit by Joe K. Stephens to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been inflicted upon him while in the service of the Houston Belt Terminal Railway Company, and upon trial before a jury verdict and judgment i
Hulbert v. California Etc. Cement Co.public domain
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 241 Petitioner has made an original application to this court to suspend the operation of a certain injunction until the decision of the appeals in two cases, in each of which the California Portland Cement Company, a corporation, is the defendant, on the ground that the property of the corporation would be so greatly
On Rehearing. PROYOSTY, J. The railroad of the defendant company traverses the Waubun plantation of the plaintiff company east and west, and has been in operation for more than 50 years. The railroad company was proceeding to enlarge its roadbed for an additional track across the plantation when the plaintiff company objected to its doing so, denying that' the railroad owned the land upon which this enlargemen