⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Dillard University v. United States of America”

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018-03-23 · Published · cited 21× · 885 F.3d 949
Appellant John Turner asks us to overrule nearly four decades of circuit precedent holding that the Sixth Amendment right to counsel does not extend to preindictment plea negotiations. See United States v. Moody , 206 F.3d 609 , 614-15 (6th Cir. 2000) (citing Un
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2010-09-10 · Published · cited 0× · 58 So. 3d 196; 2010 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 270; 2010 WL 3518669
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 198 On February 15, 2009, Kenneth Gallups sued Dillard's, Inc., seeking workers' compensation benefits ("the workers' compensation claim") and alleging that Dillard's had discharged him from his employment in violation of Ala. Code 1975, § 25-5-11.1, solely because he had made
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005-08-05 · Published · cited 42× · 416 F.3d 464; 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 16152; 2005 WL 1846998
OPINION RYAN, Circuit Judge. The defendant, Terance Johnson, appeals the district court’s in limine ruling denying him the opportunity to present a duress defense to the charges against him for participating in an armed bank robbery in which a person was killed. Following this adverse ruling, Johnson entered a plea of guilty, conditioned
District Court, District of Columbia · 2012-05-14 · Published · cited 2× · 879 F. Supp. 2d 18; 2012 WL 1664028; 193 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2316; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 66626
MEMORANDUM OPINION JAMES E. BOASBERG, District Judge. According to Woody Allen, eighty percent of life is just showing up. When it comes to satisfying a quorum requirement, though, showing up is even more important than that. Indeed, it is the only thing that matters — even when the quorum is constituted electronically. In this case, because no
District Court, District of Columbia · 2025-12-23 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. 25-cv-3675 (BAH) v. Judge Beryl A. Howell UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, et al., Defendants.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996-02-15 · Published · cited 126× · 75 F.3d 964; 43 Fed. R. Serv. 1014; 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 2316
75 F.3d 964 43 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 1014 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Anthony Jacquez LAMARR, Defendant-Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Guy A. DILLARD, Defendant-Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Maurice L. MALLORY, a/k/a Darrell Lee Lawson, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 94-5532, 94-5533 and 94-5562.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2025-08-29 · Published · cited 0×
Case: 24-40109 Document: 223-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/29/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 24-40109 FILED Aug
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1990-07-31 · Published · cited 17× · 118 B.R. 89; 1990 Bankr. LEXIS 1667; 1990 WL 123151
118 B.R. 89 (1990) In re James & Josephine DILLARD d/b/a Dillard's Service Station, Debtors. James & Josephine DILLARD d/b/a Dillard's Service Station, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES of America, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 86 B 20285, Adv. No. 89 A 1084. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D. July 31, 1990. Forrest L. I
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996-02-15 · Published · cited 1× · 75 F.3d 964; 1996 WL 64001
Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and WILLIAMS, Senior United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Virginia, sitting by designation. Affirmed by published opinion. Judge Ervin wrote the opinion, in which Judge Motz and Senior Judge Williams joined. OPINION ERVIN, Circuit Judge: Anthony J
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2024-07-08 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ Nos. 20-2048, 20-2049, 20-2080, 20-2086, 20-2087, 20-2088, 20-2100, 20-2115, 20-2116, 20-2117, 20-2133, 20-2208, 20-2229 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. KENTREVION WATKINS, et al. Defendants-Appell
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2024-07-08 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ Nos. 20-2048, 20-2049, 20-2080, 20-2086, 20-2087, 20-2088, 20-2100, 20-2115, 20-2116, 20-2117, 20-2133, 20-2208, 20-2229 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. KENTREVION WATKINS, et al. Defendants-Appell
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2024-07-08 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ Nos. 20-2048, 20-2049, 20-2080, 20-2086, 20-2087, 20-2088, 20-2100, 20-2115, 20-2116, 20-2117, 20-2133, 20-2208, 20-2229 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. KENTREVION WATKINS, et al. Defendants-Appell
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2024-07-08 · Published · cited 8× · 107 F.4th 607
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ Nos. 20-2048, 20-2049, 20-2080, 20-2086, 20-2087, 20-2088, 20-2100, 20-2115, 20-2116, 20-2117, 20-2133, 20-2208, 20-2229 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. KENTREVION WATKINS, et al. Defendants-Appell
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2024-07-08 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ Nos. 20-2048, 20-2049, 20-2080, 20-2086, 20-2087, 20-2088, 20-2100, 20-2115, 20-2116, 20-2117, 20-2133, 20-2208, 20-2229 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. KENTREVION WATKINS, et al. Defendants-Appell
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2024-07-08 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ Nos. 20-2048, 20-2049, 20-2080, 20-2086, 20-2087, 20-2088, 20-2100, 20-2115, 20-2116, 20-2117, 20-2133, 20-2208, 20-2229 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. KENTREVION WATKINS, et al. Defendants-Appell
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2024-07-08 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ Nos. 20-2048, 20-2049, 20-2080, 20-2086, 20-2087, 20-2088, 20-2100, 20-2115, 20-2116, 20-2117, 20-2133, 20-2208, 20-2229 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. KENTREVION WATKINS, et al. Defendants-Appell
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2024-07-08 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ Nos. 20-2048, 20-2049, 20-2080, 20-2086, 20-2087, 20-2088, 20-2100, 20-2115, 20-2116, 20-2117, 20-2133, 20-2208, 20-2229 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. KENTREVION WATKINS, et al. Defendants-Appell
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2024-07-08 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ Nos. 20-2048, 20-2049, 20-2080, 20-2086, 20-2087, 20-2088, 20-2100, 20-2115, 20-2116, 20-2117, 20-2133, 20-2208, 20-2229 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. KENTREVION WATKINS, et al. Defendants-Appell
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2024-07-08 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ Nos. 20-2048, 20-2049, 20-2080, 20-2086, 20-2087, 20-2088, 20-2100, 20-2115, 20-2116, 20-2117, 20-2133, 20-2208, 20-2229 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. KENTREVION WATKINS, et al. Defendants-Appell
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2024-07-08 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ Nos. 20-2048, 20-2049, 20-2080, 20-2086, 20-2087, 20-2088, 20-2100, 20-2115, 20-2116, 20-2117, 20-2133, 20-2208, 20-2229 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. KENTREVION WATKINS, et al. Defendants-Appell