Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
13 opinions for “Diego Oseguera”
United States v. Oseguera Gonzalezpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Criminal Action No. 20-40 (BAH) JESSICA JOHANNA OSEGUERA GONZALEZ, Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINI
OSEGUERApublic domain
Interim Decision #2794 MATTER OF OSEGUERA In Visa Petition Proceedings A-11807537 Decided by Board May 15, 1980 (1) Before approval of a visa petition can be denied pursuant to section 204(c) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. 1154(c), it must be established that a fraudulent marriage was entered into and that the beneficiary was previously issued a visa a
Daniel Flores v. William Barrpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DANIEL FLORES, AKA No. 15-73461 Richard Daniel Flores, Petitioner, Agency No. A013-068-941 v. WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney OPINION General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Boa
Hernandez-Mendoza v. Gonzalespublic domain
537 F.3d 976 (2007) José Antonio HERNANDEZ-MENDOZA, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent. No. 06-70926. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 8, 2007. Filed May 25, 2007. *977 Karen S. Chen, Esq., Bibianne U. Fell, Esq., Baker & McKenzie Wells Farg
Severin Mobile Towing, Inc. v. JPMorgan Chase etc.public domain
Filed 6/9/21 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SEVERIN MOBILE TOWING, INC., D077409 Plaintiff and Appellant, v. (Super. Ct. No. 37-2017- JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., 00031451-CU-MC-CTL) Defendant and Respondent. APPEAL fro
United States v. Montero-Camargopublic domain
Opinion by Judge DAMRELL; Dissent by Judge KOZINSKI. DAMRELL, District Judge: We must decide various issues arising from appellants’ convictions and one appellant’s sentence for federal crimes arising out of a traffic stop near a border patrol checkpoint. I On the afternoon of October 15, 1996, border patrol agents stationed at the Northbound Highway 86 checkpo
United States v. Lopez-Sandovalpublic domain
PREGERSON, Circuit Judge: Carlos Lopez-Sandoval and Moisés Gonzalez appeal their sentences for conspiracy to distribute cocaine under 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 and 846, distribution of cocaine under 21 U.S.C. § 841, and possession of cocaine with intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 and 812. Lopez-Sandoval and Gonzalez contend that the district court erred by applying a firearm enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 2Dl.l(b)(l).
United States v. Victor Ramirez-Martinezpublic domain
*907 TROTT, Circuit Judge: Due to some creative lawyering, this seemingly run-of-the-mill alien smuggling case requires us to confront a melange of novel legal issues. A jury convicted Defendant-Appellant Victor Ramirez-Martinez (“Ramirez”) of two counts of attempting to transport
146 F.3d 712 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4578, 98 Daily JournalD.A.R. 6269UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Carlos LOPEZ-SANDOVAL, Defendant-Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Moises GONZALEZ, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 97-30167, 97-30178. United States Court of Appeals,Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 1, 1998
United States v. Fregapublic domain
RYMER, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part: Because the district judge correctly instructed on RICO conspiracy, but the majority holds otherwise, I dissent from Part VII. This requires me to consider other RICO challenges that the majority avoids, but which the district court also properly resolved. Finally, since the facts matter and must be viewed in li
120 F.3d 937 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5598, 97 Daily JournalD.A.R. 9058UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.James Leroy KEMMISH, Defendant-Appellee.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.James Leroy KEMMISH, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 96-50241, 96-50250. United States Court of Appeals,Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted March
Falls v. Superior Courtpublic domain
42 Cal.App.4th 1031 (1996) 49 Cal. Rptr.2d 908 THOMAS FALLS et al., Petitioners, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, Respondent; RICARDO SAMANIEGO et al., Real Parties in Interest. Docket No. B096698. Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Seven. February 20, 1996. *1033 COUNSEL
Daniel Campbell v. City of Los Angelespublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DANIEL CAMPBELL; et al, * No. 15-56990 Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. v. 2:04-cv-08592- AG-AJW CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Defendant-Appellee. CESAR MATA,