⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

13 opinions for “Diego Oseguera”

District Court, District of Columbia · 2020-12-11 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Criminal Action No. 20-40 (BAH) JESSICA JOHANNA OSEGUERA GONZALEZ, Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINI
OSEGUERApublic domain
Board of Immigration Appeals · 1980-07-01 · Published · cited 2× · 17 I. & N. Dec. 386
Interim Decision #2794 MATTER OF OSEGUERA In Visa Petition Proceedings A-11807537 Decided by Board May 15, 1980 (1) Before approval of a visa petition can be denied pursuant to section 204(c) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. 1154(c), it must be established that a fraudulent marriage was entered into and that the beneficiary was previously issued a visa a
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019-07-18 · Published · cited 28× · 930 F.3d 1082
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DANIEL FLORES, AKA No. 15-73461 Richard Daniel Flores, Petitioner, Agency No. A013-068-941 v. WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney OPINION General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Boa
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007-05-25 · Published · cited 11× · 537 F.3d 976; 233 F. App'x 724; 233 Fed. Appx. 724; 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 12776; 2007 WL 5404597
537 F.3d 976 (2007) José Antonio HERNANDEZ-MENDOZA, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent. No. 06-70926. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 8, 2007. Filed May 25, 2007. *977 Karen S. Chen, Esq., Bibianne U. Fell, Esq., Baker & McKenzie Wells Farg
California Court of Appeal · 2021-06-09 · Published · cited 0×
Filed 6/9/21 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SEVERIN MOBILE TOWING, INC., D077409 Plaintiff and Appellant, v. (Super. Ct. No. 37-2017- JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., 00031451-CU-MC-CTL) Defendant and Respondent. APPEAL fro
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999-05-13 · Published · cited 4× · 177 F.3d 1113; 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3479; 99 Daily Journal DAR 4477; 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 9036; 1999 WL 298262
Opinion by Judge DAMRELL; Dissent by Judge KOZINSKI. DAMRELL, District Judge: We must decide various issues arising from appellants’ convictions and one appellant’s sentence for federal crimes arising out of a traffic stop near a border patrol checkpoint. I On the afternoon of October 15, 1996, border patrol agents stationed at the Northbound Highway 86 checkpo
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998-06-15 · Published · cited 36× · 146 F.3d 712; 98 Daily Journal DAR 6269; 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4578; 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 12659; 1998 WL 309924
PREGERSON, Circuit Judge: Carlos Lopez-Sandoval and Moisés Gonzalez appeal their sentences for conspiracy to distribute cocaine under 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 and 846, distribution of cocaine under 21 U.S.C. § 841, and possession of cocaine with intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 and 812. Lopez-Sandoval and Gonzalez contend that the district court erred by applying a firearm enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 2Dl.l(b)(l).
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001-12-05 · Published · cited 73× · 273 F.3d 903; 2001 Daily Journal DAR 12623; 2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 10141; 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 25975; 2001 WL 1539632
*907 TROTT, Circuit Judge: Due to some creative lawyering, this seemingly run-of-the-mill alien smuggling case requires us to confront a melange of novel legal issues. A jury convicted Defendant-Appellant Victor Ramirez-Martinez (“Ramirez”) of two counts of attempting to transport
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998-06-15 · Published · cited 30× · 146 F.3d 712
146 F.3d 712 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4578, 98 Daily JournalD.A.R. 6269UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Carlos LOPEZ-SANDOVAL, Defendant-Appellant.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Moises GONZALEZ, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 97-30167, 97-30178. United States Court of Appeals,Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 1, 1998
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999-06-08 · Published · cited 204× · 179 F.3d 793; 99 Daily Journal DAR 5643; 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4392; 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 11774; 1999 WL 366572
RYMER, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part: Because the district judge correctly instructed on RICO conspiracy, but the majority holds otherwise, I dissent from Part VII. This requires me to consider other RICO challenges that the majority avoids, but which the district court also properly resolved. Finally, since the facts matter and must be viewed in li
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997-07-15 · Published · cited 36× · 120 F.3d 937
120 F.3d 937 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5598, 97 Daily JournalD.A.R. 9058UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.James Leroy KEMMISH, Defendant-Appellee.UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.James Leroy KEMMISH, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 96-50241, 96-50250. United States Court of Appeals,Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted March
California Court of Appeal · 1996-02-20 · Published · cited 9× · 42 Cal. App. 4th 1031; 49 Cal. Rptr. 2d 908; 96 Daily Journal DAR 1960; 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1159; 1996 Cal. App. LEXIS 140
42 Cal.App.4th 1031 (1996) 49 Cal. Rptr.2d 908 THOMAS FALLS et al., Petitioners, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, Respondent; RICARDO SAMANIEGO et al., Real Parties in Interest. Docket No. B096698. Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Seven. February 20, 1996. *1033 COUNSEL
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018-09-13 · Published · cited 316× · 903 F.3d 1090
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DANIEL CAMPBELL; et al, * No. 15-56990 Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. v. 2:04-cv-08592- AG-AJW CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Defendant-Appellee. CESAR MATA,