Cases

646 N.W.2d 105 (2002) Lyle FLOYD, Appellee, v. QUAKER OATS, Appellant. No. 00-1618. Supreme Court of Iowa. June 12, 2002. *106 Mark A. Woollums and Jean Dickson Feeney of Betty, Neuman & McMahon, L.L.P., Davenport, for appellant. Pete Leehey and Melissa M. Harbaugh Adams of Wertz & Leehey, P.C., Cedar Rapids, for a

SCHNACKENBERG, Circuit Judge. State Wholesale Grocers and Zeig-mund Wholesale Grocery Co., Inc., Illinois corporations (hereinafter referred to as plaintiff wholesalers), and a group of individual store retailers of grocery products and other related products (hereinafter referred to as plaintiff retailers), all engaged in business in the Metropolitan Area of Chicago, Illinois,

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 16-0505 Filed January 11, 2017 ALFREDO AYALA, Petitioner-Appellant, vs. TYSON FOODS INC., Respondent-Appellee. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk County, Paul D. Scott, Judge. Claimant appeals the denial of his petition for review-reopening. AFFIRMED. Andrew

571 N.W.2d 16 (1997) Jose MURILLO, Appellee, v. BLACKHAWK FOUNDRY and Sedgwick James, Appellants. No. 96-184. Supreme Court of Iowa. November 26, 1997. *17 Mark A. Woollums and Jean Dickson Feeney of Betty, Neuman & McMahon, L.L.P., Davenport, for appellants. Daniel Bernstein of William J. Briebriesco & Associates,

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2023 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 603 U. S. Part 1 Pages 369–479 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 28, 2024 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are

(2007) Donelle KEATON, Plaintiff, v. COBB COUNTY, Georgia, et al., Defendants. Civil Action File No. 1:06-CV-1438-RWS-AJB. United States District Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta. Division. February 19, 2007. ORDER RICHARD W. STORY, District Judge. This case is before the Court for consideration of the Report and Recommendation [42] of Mag

OPINION OF THE COURT FISHER, Circuit Judge. In May 1996, Appellant Douglas Colkitt, M.D., entered into an “Offshore Convertible Securities Purchase Agreement” (the “Agreement”) with Appellee Berckeley Investment Group, Ltd., an offshore financing entity based in the Bahamas. The Agreement provided that Colkitt would receive $2,000,000 from Berckeley in e

455 F.3d 195 BERCKELEY INVESTMENT GROUP, LTD.v.Douglas COLKITT; Shoreline Pacific Institutional Finance, The Institutional Division of Finance West Group; National Medical Financial Services CorporationDouglas R. Colkitt, Appellant. No. 04-3844. United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. Argued February 21, 2006. Filed July 25, 2006.</

305 F.Supp.2d 1059 (2004) Suzy DAVIDSON, Plaintiff, v. WAL-MART ASSOCIATES HEALTH AND WELFARE PLAN, Defendant. No. 4:03-CV-40080. United States District Court, S.D. Iowa, Central Division. February 20, 2004. *1060 *1061 *1062 R. Ronald Pogge, Hopkins &

ACCEPTED 06-15-00013-CV SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS 9/16/2015 4:49:55 PM

J.D. Broome, doing business as Broome Contracting and Maintenance Company, and ten others, being employees of J.D. Broome, filed their bill of complaint against Hattiesburg Building and Trades Council, a labor organization, whose place of business was in Forrest County, Mississippi, and six other local unions, as described in the bill, and Cecil T. Harvison and F.D. Conn, individuals. The complainants, other than Broome, were men with families, and it was necessary for them to

Appellant landlord challenges the validity of those provisions of the Administrative Code of the City of New *Page 179 York which restrict the right of landlords to evict tenants from "apartments in the city" (Administrative Code of City of New York, § U41-7.0, subd. c, as validated by L. 1948, chs. 4, 699). That challenge is levelled at the local law as it read before the amendment of October, 1949 (Local Laws, 1949, No. 73 of City of New York; see

Cuff, J. This is an application pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Act to review the action of respondents who have refused to grant a certificate of eviction to the petitioner., Respondents constitute the temporary city housing rent commission of the city of New York. Petitioner is the owner of a two-family house, situated in Queens County, New York City. A statutory tenant occupies part of that hou

FRIENDLY, Circuit Judge: We have here 15 petitions under § 701 (f) of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, 21 U.S.C. § 371(f), to review two final regulations of the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA)1 relating to vitamin and mineral supplements sold as foods. One regula-lation, entitled Part 125 — Label Statements Concerning Dietary Properties of Food Purporting To Be Or Repres

504 F.2d 761 NATIONAL NUTRITIONAL FOODS ASSOCIATION and Solgar Company,Inc., et al., Petitioners,v.FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION and United States Department ofHealth, Educationand Welfare, et al., Respondents. Nos. 1189-1203, Dockets 73-2129, 73-2166, 73-2175, 73-2449,73-2745, 73-2746,73-2747, 73-2748, 73-2752,73-2753, 73-2762, 73-2824, 73-2826,73-2834 and74-1055. United

ACCEPTED 03-15-00348-CV 6616789 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

235 F.Supp.2d 549 (2002) In re ENRON CORPORATION SECURITIES, DERIVATIVE & ERISA LITIGATION. This Document Relates to All Cases. Mark Newby, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Enron Corporation, et al., Defendants. The Regents of the University of California, et al., Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs, v. Kenneth L. Lay, et al., Defendants. MDL No. 1446 Civil Action No. H-01-36