⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Dickerson, Alexander v. Bureau of Indian Affairs”

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012-04-17 · Published · cited 230× · 677 F.3d 383; 2012 WL 1293149
Opinion by Judge IKUTA; Concurrence by Chief Judge KOZINSKI; Concurrence by Judge BERZON; Partial Concurrence *388and Partial Dissent by Judge PREGERSON; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge RAWLINSON. OPINION IKUTA, Circuit Judge: Proposition 200 requires prospective voters in Arizona to provide proof of U.S. citizensh
District Court, S.D. New York · 2013-02-14 · Published · cited 34× · 925 F. Supp. 2d 478; 2013 WL 628534; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22383
OPINION & ORDER SHIRA A. SCHEINDLIN, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION.......................................................483 II. LEGAL STANDARD FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION..................486 III. APPLICABLE LAW.....................................................487 A. Sources of Liability.............................................
Supreme Court of the United States · 2023-06-29 · Published · cited 34× · 600 U.S. 181
(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2022 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010-10-26 · Published · cited 5× · 624 F.3d 1162; 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 22071; 2010 WL 4192623
Opinion by Judge IKUTA; Dissent by Chief Judge KOZINSKI. OPINION IKUTA, Circuit Judge: Proposition 200 requires prospective voters in Arizona to present documentary proof of citizenship in order to register to vote, Ariz.Rev.Stat. §§ 16-152,16-166, and requires registered voters to present proof of identification in order to cast a ballot at the polls, Ariz.Rev.Stat. § 16-579. This
Supreme Court of the United States · 2008-06-26 · Published · cited 3123× · 171 L. Ed. 2d 637; 128 S. Ct. 2783; 554 U.S. 570; 2008 U.S. LEXIS 5268
*573Justice Scalia delivered the opinion of the Court. We consider whether a District of Columbia prohibition on the possession of usable handguns in the home violates the Second Amendment to the Constitution. *574I
Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2010-12-10 · Published · cited 228× · 9 A.3d 882; 204 N.J. 320; 2010 N.J. LEXIS 1260; 110 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1803
Chief Justice RABNER, concurring. By order dated September 8, 2010, the Presiding Judge for Administration of the Appellate Division, the Honorable Edwin H. Stern, was temporarily assigned to the Supreme Court until further order. As a result, he participated in the resolution of this matter and authored the majority opinion. Article VI, Section II, Paragraph 1 of the New Jersey Constituti
District Court, N.D. Alabama · 1991-12-30 · Published · cited 26× · 787 F. Supp. 1030; 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19151; 1991 WL 286238
787 F.Supp. 1030 (1991) John F. KNIGHT, Jr., Alma S. Freeman, John T. Gibson, Susan Buskey, Carl Petty, Dennis Charles Barnett by his father Arthur D. Barnett, Vonda Cross, Tammi Palmer, Alease S. Sims, Stacey Levise Sims by her parents Levi Sims and Alease S. Sims, Gary Mitchell, Jr., Grover L. Brown, Frederick Carodine, Frankie Patricia Yarbrough, Dr. Charles Edwards McMillan, Horace W. Rice, Anthony Y. Lavonne Thompson by his mother Lois N. Thompson,
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1978-11-30 · Published · cited 35× · 469 F. Supp. 329
469 F.Supp. 329 (1978) COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and Raymond Williams et al., on their own behalf and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. LOCAL UNION 542, INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS, Operating Engineers Joint Apprenticeship and Training Committee of Philadelphia, Eastern Pennsylvania and Delaware, General Building Contractors Association, Inc., Contractors Association of Eastern Pennsylvania, United Contractors Associ
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1978-11-30 · Published · cited 2× · 469 F. Supp. 329; 26 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 1174; 1978 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14106; 19 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 9028; 18 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1560
TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE I. INTRODUCTION 335 II. FINDINGS 339 A. The Hiring System 339 B. The Philadelphia Plan 342 C. The Benjamin Franklin Programs I and II 345 D. Procedural History 347 E. The Delays and Contempt Issues Involving Abraham Freedman, Esquire 348 F. The Named Plai
District Court, D. North Dakota · 2005-01-31 · Published · cited 3× · 395 F. Supp. 2d 850; 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3343; 2005 WL 548423
395 F.Supp.2d 850 (2005) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Neil Alexander GREY WATER, Defendant. No. C2-04-145. United States District Court, D. North Dakota, Northeastern Division. January 31, 2005. *851 Brett M. Shasky, U.S. Attorney's Office, Fargo, ND, for Plaintiff. *852 Dani
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019-02-28 · Published · cited 6× · 916 F.3d 1202
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT YASSIR FAZAGA; ALI UDDIN MALIK; No. 12-56867 YASSER ABDELRAHIM, Plaintiffs-Appellees, D.C. No. 8:11-cv-00301- v. CJC-VBK FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION; CHRISTOPHER A. WRAY, Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, in his official capacity; PAUL DELACOURT, Assistant Director in Charg
Michigan Supreme Court · 2022-07-26 · Published · cited 0×
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan Syllabus Chief Justice: Justices: Bridget M. McCormack Brian K. Zahra
Michigan Supreme Court · 2022-07-26 · Published · cited 0×
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan Syllabus Chief Justice: Justices: Bridget M. McCormack Brian K. Zahra
Michigan Supreme Court · 2022-07-26 · Published · cited 0×
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan Syllabus Chief Justice: Justices: Bridget M. McCormack Brian K. Zahra
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020-07-20 · Published · cited 0×
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT YASSIR FAZAGA; ALI UDDIN MALIK; No. 12-56867 YASSER ABDELRAHIM, Plaintiffs-Appellees, D.C. No. 8:11-cv-00301- v. CJC-VBK FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION; CHRISTOPHER A. WRAY, Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, in his official capacity; PAUL DELACOURT, Assistant Director in Charg
Supreme Court of the United States · 2004-04-19 · Published · cited 178× · 158 L. Ed. 2d 420; 124 S. Ct. 1628; 541 U.S. 193; 2004 U.S. LEXIS 2738
541 U.S. 193 (2004) UNITED STATES v. LARA. No. 03-107. Supreme Court of United States. Argued January 21, 2004. Decided April 19, 2004. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. *194 *195 BREYER, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which R
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2024-12-23 · Published · cited 92× · 124 F.4th 218
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ______________ No. 21-2835 ______________ BRYAN DAVID RANGE, Appellant v. ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; REGINA LOMBARDO, Acting Director, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives __________
Gonzalez v. Arizonapublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010-10-26 · Published · cited 0× · 649 F.3d 953
624 F.3d 1162 (2010) Maria M. GONZALEZ,; Luciano Valencia; The Inter Tribal Council of Arizona, Inc.; Arizona Advocacy Network; Steve M. Gallardo; League of United Latin American Citizens Arizona; League of Women Voters of Arizona; People for the American Way Foundation; Hopi Tribe, Plaintiffs, *1163 and Bernie Abeytia; Arizona Hispanic Community Forum; Chicanos Por La Causa; Friendly House; Jesus Gonzalez; Debbie
District Court, E.D. New York · 2015-10-05 · Published · cited 54× · 311 F.R.D. 29; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 137034; 2015 WL 5781541
MEMORANDUM & ORDER JACK B. WEINSTEIN, Senior District Judge: Table of ¡ontents I. Introduction..................... ......................................38 II. Facts. III. Pending Litigation and Administrative Proceedings ..........................42 A. Litigation...........................................................42