Cases

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS RALPH MIRANDA, § No. 08-23-00270-CV Appellant, § Appeal from the v. 34th District Court VICTOR M. DIAZ, ZENAIDA B. § of El Paso C

MURGUIA, Circuit Judge, with whom KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, and SILVERMAN, CALLAHAN, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges, join, dissenting: When Congress enacted the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA), it severely restricted the power of federal courts to provide relief to habeas petitioners convicted in state court, even when we might believe that the conviction was the result of unlawful procee

[Cite as State v. Diaz, 2025-Ohio-2924.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LAKE COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, CASE NO. 2024-L-077 Plaintiff-Appellee, Criminal Appeal from the - vs - Court of Common Pleas JULIO C. DIAZ,

22-1678 Diaz v. Kopp 1 United States Court of Appeals 2 for the Second Circuit 3 _________________ 4 5 August Term 2024 6 7 Argued: March 7, 2025 8 Decided: July 30, 2025 9 10 No. 22-1678 11

STATE v. DIAZ2025 OK CR 2Case Number: S-2024-208Decided: 01/30/2025STATE OF OKLAHOMA, Appellant v. JESSE SETH DIAZ, JR., Appellee Cite as: 2025 OK CR 2, __ __ SUMMARY OPINION MUSSEMAN, VICE PRESIDING JUDGE:

People v Diaz (2025 NY Slip Op 00330) People v Diaz 2025 NY Slip Op 00330 Decided on January 22, 2025 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

Case: 24-50088 Document: 72-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/13/2024 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED ____________ December

************************************************ The “officially released” date that appears near the beginning of an opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it is released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for the filing of postopin- ion motions and petitions for certification is the “offi- cially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical cor

Schoonover v Diaz (2023 NY Slip Op 06578) Schoonover v Diaz 2023 NY Slip Op 06578 Decided on December 21, 2023 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

Nardeo v Diaz (2024 NY Slip Op 24028) [*1] Nardeo v Diaz 2024 NY Slip Op 24028 Decided on January 31, 2024 Civil Court Of The City Of New York, Bronx County Ibrahim, J. Published by New York State Law Repo

[Cite as State v. Diaz, 2023-Ohio-1045.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellant, : No. 111794 v. : JOEL DIAZ, :

In the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas ══════════ No. WR-95,281-01 ══════════ EX PARTE JOSE DE JESUS DIAZ HERNANDEZ A.K.A. JOSE DIAZ, Applicant ═══════════════════════════════════════ On Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus In Cause No. D-1-DC-98-980863-A In the 167th District Court

Schoonover v Diaz (2023 NY Slip Op 06578) Schoonover v Diaz 2023 NY Slip Op 06578 Decided on December 21, 2023 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX 26-JUN-2023 08:20 AM Dkt. 47 SO NO. CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX

APPEALS COURT COMMONWEALTH vs. MICHAEL DIAZ Docket: 23-P-1462 Dates: October 1, 2024 – August 29, 2025 Present: Neyman,

People v Diaz (2023 NY Slip Op 00458) People v Diaz 2023 NY Slip Op 00458 Decided on February 2, 2023 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.