Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Dias v. Dias”
State v. Diaspublic domain
NOTICE: This opinion is subject to modification resulting from motions for reconsideration under Supreme Court Rule 27, the Court’s reconsideration, and editorial revisions by the Reporter of Decisions. The version of the opinion published in the Advance Sheets for the Georgia Reports, designated as the “Final Copy,” will replace any prior version on the Court’s website and docket. A bound volume of the Georgia Reports will contain the final and official text of the opinion. In the Supreme
Dias v. Boonepublic domain
320 Ga. 785 FINAL COPY S24A0887. DIAS v. BOONE. PETERSON, Presiding Justice. This case presents the question of the constitutionality of OCGA § 19-7-3.1, known as the Equitable Caregiver Statute. Under that statute, a person who is not a legal parent of a child may seek rights such as custody or visitation with the child if he or she proves that certain criteria have been met, including that he or she has undertaken a “parental” role with the child and deve
Linus F. Dias v. Ritika Diaspublic domain
NUMBER 13-12-00685-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG LINUS F. DIAS, Appellant, v. RITIKA DIAS, Appellee. On appeal from the 28th District Court
State v. Christine Diaspublic domain
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia ATLANTA,____________________ July 18, 2024 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order: A24A0795. THE STATE v. DIAS. In the above-referenced case, the State appeals the trial court’s grant of Christine Dias’s motion to suppress evidence of her refusal to submit to a state- administered blood test following her DUI arrest. The trial court, cont
Linus F. Dias v. Ritika Diaspublic domain
FILE COPY M A N D A T E TO THE 28TH DISTRICT COURT of NUECES COUNTY, GREETINGS: Before our Court of Appeals for the Thirteenth District of Texas, on the 25th of November, 2014, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between LINUS F. DIAS, Appellant, v. RITIKA
Dias v. Town of Ulsterpublic domain
Dias v Town of Ulster (2025 NY Slip Op 04127) Dias v Town of Ulster 2025 NY Slip Op 04127 Decided on July 10, 2025 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion i
Dias v. Statepublic domain
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-17-0000133 16-FEB-2018 01:17 PM
Commonwealth v. Diaspublic domain
The defendant admitted to facts sufficient to support a finding of guilty on charges of uttering a false prescription and conspiracy to violate the Controlled Substances Act; he later filed a motion to withdraw his admission. He now appeals from the order denying that motion, arguing that the admission was not knowing and intelligent, because the judge failed to advise him properly of the potential immigration consequences of such an admission, as required b
Dias v. Crane Co.public domain
APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT (CIVIL NO. 13-1-2196-08) MEMORANDUM OPINION Affirmed.
Commonwealth v. Diaspublic domain
In November of 1996, the defendant pleaded guilty to various drug and other offenses, including receiving a stolen motor vehicle. Before us now is the defendant's appeal from the denial of his seventh motion under Mass. R. Crim. P. 30 (b), as appearing in 435 Mass. 1501 (2001), to withdraw his guilty pleas and for a new trial. He also appeals from t
Linus F. Dias v. Ritika Diaspublic domain
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS 13-12-00685-CV LINUS F. DIAS v. RITIKA DIAS On Appeal from the 28th District Court of Nueces County, Texas Trial Cause No. 2010-FAM-5586-A JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH
Bryan Imari Dias v. Hannah Grizzlepublic domain
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas January 8, 2025 No. 04-24-00743-CV Bryan Imari DIAS, Appellant v. Hannah GRIZZLE, Appellee From the 73rd Judicial Dis
Commonwealth v. Diaspublic domain
No opinion found.Click here to view source material.
Bryan Imari Dias v. Hannah Grizzlepublic domain
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-24-00743-CV Bryan Imari DIAS, Appellant v. Hannah GRIZZLE, Appellee
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT WINSTON DIAS and KATHLEEN DIAS, Appellants, v. UNIVERSAL PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee. No. 4D20-2575 [November 3, 2021] Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Nicholas
United States v. Diaspublic domain
Appellate Case: 25-6028 Document: 64-1 Date Filed: 05/06/2026 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS May 6, 2026
Linus F. Dias v. Ritika Diaspublic domain
NUMBER 13-11-00756-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________ LINUS F. DIAS, Appellant, v. RITIKA DIAS, Appellee. __________________________________________
Dias v. Colvinpublic domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RE: MOTION TO REVERSE (DOCKET ENTRY # 17); DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO AFFIRM THE COMMISSIONER’S DECISION (DOCKET ENTRY # 21) BOWLER, United States Magistrate Judge. Pending before this court is a motion by plaintiff Heidi Dias (“plaintiff’) seeking to reverse the decision of defendant Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (the “Commissioner”). (Docket E
Dias, Jr. v. United Statespublic domain
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 18-585C (Filed: April 21, 2020) ) KENNETH JOHN DIAS, JR., ) ) Claim of breach of contract; cancellation of Plaintiff, ) bid to buy residential property owned by )
People v. Diaspublic domain
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Knopf, J.), rendered March 8, 2012, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed. The defendant’s knowing, voluntary, and intelligent waiver of his right, to appeal precludes review of his claim that the court erred by denying his mo