Cases

PER CURIAM. We dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. The circuit court has not yet entered a final order terminating or oth*572erwise disposing of attorney Donna Goldman’s charging lien claim. WARNER, FARMER and GROSS, JJ., concur.

[Cite as State v. Zimmerman, 2014-Ohio-1152.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT GEAUGA COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO, : OPINION Plaintiff-Appellee, : CASE NO. 2013-G-3146 - vs - : GERALD F. ZIMMERMAN,

Opinion issued November 1, 2018 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-17-00612-CV ——————————— DIANE DAVIS, Appellant V. BRANDAN VAUGHTERS, Appellee

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan October 24, 2011 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice 143126

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Jerry L. Crispino, J.), entered May 27, 2003, which granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment and dismissed the action, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the motion denied, the complaint reinstated, and the matter remanded for further proceedings. In May of 1995, plaintiff brought an action against Skate Key Roller Rink, Inc. (Skate Key) for injuries she sustained on Skate Key’s p

266 Wis.2d 1003 (2003) 2003 WI App 196 669 N.W.2d 762 STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent,[†] v. Evan ZIMMERMAN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 02-3097-CR. Court of Appeals of Wisconsin. Submitted on briefs June 24, 2003. Decided August 12, 2003. *1009 On

PER CURIAM: In this case, we granted the Plaintiff/Appellant’s motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis and appointed counsel to brief and argue the important issue of jurisdiction presented for decision. The plaintiff, Glenda M. Hodges, sued the Georgia Department of Corrections, its Commissioner, and the administration of the Central Correctional Institution under 42 U.S.C. § 2000e (Title VII). Hodges, a black femal

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS WILLIAM EGGEMEYER, DIANE § EGGEMEYER, BO EGGEMEYER, and SHARYLAND DISTRIBUTION & § No. 08-19-00002-CV TRANSMISSION SERVICES, LLC § Appeal from the Appellants,

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER BABCOCK, Chief Judge. These cases, consolidated for the purpose of determining the disposition of certain sensitive discovery materials, arose out of the tragedy that occurred at Columbine High School on April 20, 1999. Brian E. Rohr-bough and others brought Civil Case No. 00-B-808 (the “Rohrbough Case”) against Wayne and Kathy Harris (“Harasses”) and Tom and Sue Klebold (“Kle

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________ No. 03-3717 DIANE PUGEL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS, a public corporation, Defendant-Appellee. ____________ Appeal from the United States Dis

585 N.W.2d 445 (1998) 255 Neb. 410 Joyce ZIMMERMAN, Appellant, v. FIRSTIER BANK, N.A., et al., Appellees. No. S-97-672. Supreme Court of Nebraska. October 23, 1998. *448 Mark J. Curley, of Brown & Brown, P.C., Omaha, for appellant. Kermit A. Brashear, Scott E. Daniel, and Anna M. Bednar, of Bras

KANNE, Circuit Judge. Defendants, a group of law firms and several of their attorneys, had previously represented Plaintiff Carlos Rocha and other FedEx delivery drivers in an employment miselassifieation case against FedEx. The employment miselassifieation case ultimately settled, but Rocha was excluded from the settlement. Just before the settlement was finalized, Rocha retained Johnson, his current spouse, and discharged De

234 B.R. 852 (1999) In re Kimberly SMITH, Debtor. Bankruptcy No. 98-55471-JDW. United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Georgia, Macon Division. June 2, 1999. *853 Diane M. Zimmerman, Warner Robins, GA, for debtor. *854 Camille Hope, Macon, GA, for trustee. MEMORANDUM OPINION

550 F.Supp. 84 (1982) Gordon ZIMMERMAN, Plaintiff, v. CONRAIL, Defendant. No. 82 CIV. 5689 (LBS). United States District Court, S.D. New York. October 22, 1982. *85 Gordon Zimmerman, pro se. Michael J. Siris, New York City, for defendant. OPINION SAND, District Judge. Plaintiffs,[1]

(2008) UNIONAMERICA INSURANCE CO., LIMITED, Successor-in-interest to St. Paul Reinsurance, Plaintiffs, v. The FORT MILLER GROUP, INC., The Fort Miller Co. and Beeche Systems Corp., Defendants. No. C05-1912 BZ. United States District Court, N.D. California. December 22, 2008. ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION BERNARD ZIMMERMAN

477 S.E.2d 141 (1996) 223 Ga. App. 19 JR. MILLS CONSTRUCTION v. TRICHINOTIS. No. A96A2150. Court of Appeals of Georgia. September 27, 1996. *142 Diane M. Zimmerman, Warner Robins, for Appellant. Sonya C. Popken, for Appellee. ELDRIDGE, Judge. Appellant Jr. Mills Construction filed suit

RIPPLE, Circuit Judge. After dismissal for academic misconduct from the University of Illinois (“the University”), Diane Pugel brought this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against the Board of Trustees of the University (“the Board”). She alleged violations of her due process and free speech rights. Ms. Pugel also brought state claims. The district court dismissed the federal claims and d

537 S.E.2d 477 (2000) 245 Ga. App. 221 DAVIS v. BUSHNELL. No. A00A1221. Court of Appeals of Georgia. July 17, 2000. *478 Diane M. Zimmerman, Warner Robins, for appellant. Martin, Snow, Grant & Napier, Lisa M. Edwards, Jay C. Traynham, Macon, for appellee. MIKELL, Judge. The trial c

Birdsong, Presiding Judge. After the grant of a discretionary appeal under OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (10), Jerie Williams challenges the trial court’s grant of attorney fees to Marie W. Binion, who prevailed in her underlying action against Williams on her claims for dissolution of a partnership and payment of partnership assets. After the jury returned a general verdict for $17,108 in her favor, Binion moved for an award of attorney

McMurray, Presiding Judge, dissenting. I respectfully dissent from the affirmance of summary judgment in this premises liability action as I feel the issues involved should be resolved by a jury. According to the affidavit of Jim Sheffield, the “Stockroom and Maintenance Manager for J. C. Penney Co., Inc.,” defendant’s “routine cleaning and maintenance does not include an