Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Diane L. Farr-Ford”
Diane Owens v. FirstEnergy Corporationpublic domain
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 25a0225p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ IN RE: FIRSTENERGY CORPORATION SECURITIES │ LITIGATION.
Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed November 4, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court
Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed December 21, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court Harr
STATE EX REL. DESELM v. Jordanpublic domain
296 S.W.3d 530 (2008) STATE of Tennessee ex rel. Bee DESELM, et al. v. Diane JORDAN, et al. Not in source. Court of Appeals of Tennessee, Eastern Section, at Knoxville. June 16, 2008 Session. September 12, 2008. Permission to Appeal Denied by Supreme Court February 17, 2009. Herbert S. Moncier, Knoxville, Tennessee, for the Appellan
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ______ Argued February 25, 2013 Decided May 28, 2013 No. 12-1337 COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, PETITIONER v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION AND UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, RESPONDENTS THE TENNIS CHANNEL, INC.,
Elaine Robinson v. Pfizer, Inc.public domain
ARNOLD, Circuit Judge. Elaine Robinson is one of 64 women from 29 states who sued Pfizer in a Missouri state court, asserting state-law claims that arose from Pfizer’s manufacture and sale of the drug Lipitor, which they allege causes diabetes. Pfizer removed the ease to federal district court, 1 maintaining that the ca
Briggs Tax Service, LLC v. Detroit Public Schoolspublic domain
780 N.W.2d 753 (2010) BRIGGS TAX SERVICE, L.L.C., Petitioner-Appellee, v. DETROIT PUBLIC SCHOOLS and Detroit Board of Education, Respondents-Appellants, and City of Detroit and Wayne County Treasurer, Respondents. Briggs Tax Service, L.L.C., Petitioner-Appellee, v. Detroit Public Schools, Detroit Board of Education, and Wayne County Treasurer, Respondents, and City of Detroit, Respondent-Appellant. Briggs Tax Service, L.L.
Lewis v. Horace Mann Insurancepublic domain
410 F.Supp.2d 640 (2005) Ronald L. LEWIS, Plaintiff v. HORACE MANN INSURANCE CO., Defendant. No. 1:03CV1281. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. August 23, 2005. *641 *642 *643 *644 J. Charles Ruiz
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ALL PLAINTIFFS REPRESENTED BY JOHN DRISCOLL, Plaintiffs, v. No. 20-cv-622-ZMF ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION From 2006 to 2011, sixty-three terrorist attacks on United States military servicemembers in Iraq killed forty-six and sever
Garcia-Melendez v. Ashcroftpublic domain
VANCE, District Judge: Appellant Juan Garcia-Melendez seeks judicial review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order affirming the Immigration Judge’s decision denying Garcia’s application for cancellation of removal. Further, Garcia challenges the BIA’s use, in his case, of a single-member appeal panel and summary affirmance procedure. We deny appellant’s petition.
OPINION ROBERT HOLMES BELL, District Judge. Before the Court at this time are the Plaintiff Grand Trunk Western Railroad Company’s (“Grand Trunk”) and Defendant Rieth-Riley Construction Company’s (“Ri-eth-Riley”) cross-motions for partial summary judgment and summary judgment, respectively. The question in this case is whether Rieth-Riley is an “owner” or “operator” of a loading dock on land
Meredith v. Buchmanpublic domain
101 F.Supp.2d 764 (2000) Robert F. MEREDITH III and Carylyn Hancock, Co-Administrators of the Estates of Robert F. Meredith IV, Deceased, Plaintiffs. v. J.K. BUCHMAN, M.D.; J.K. Buchman, M.D., P.A.; and HCA Health Services of Midwest, Inc. d/b/a Columbia Doctors Hospital, Defendants. No. 4:99CV00418WRW. United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Western Division. June 20, 200
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ELAINE E. BUCKLO, District Judge. In this action, the EEOC brings claims: 1) on behalf of seventeen present and former employees of defendant RJB Properties who worked as janitors or janitorial supervisors at the site of one of defendants’ clients, Illinois Institute of Technology (“IIT”); and 2) on behalf of five present and former employees who worked as janitors
In Re Accutane Products Liabilitypublic domain
511 F.Supp.2d 1288 (2007) In re ACCUTANE PRODUCTS LIABILITY. No. 8:04-md-2523-T-30TBM, MDL No. 1626. United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division. June 15, 2007. *1289 Edward A. Moss, Rafael Cruz-Alvarez, Shook, Hardy & Bacon, L.L.P., Miami, FL, Michael X. Imbroscio, Paul W. Schmidt, Covington & Burling LLP, Washing
Jan K. Voda, M.D. v. Cordis Corporationpublic domain
476 F.3d 887 Jan K. VODA, M.D., Plaintiff-Appellee,v.CORDIS CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant. No. 05-1238. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. February 1, 2007. Mitchell G. Stockwell, Kilpatrick Stockton LLP, of Atlanta, GA, argued for plaintiff-appellee. With him on the brief was Jonathan K. Waldrop.
Finderne Mgmt. Co., Inc. v. Barrettpublic domain
809 A.2d 842 (2002) 355 N.J. Super. 170 FINDERNE MANAGEMENT COMPANY, INC.; Rocque Dameo; and Daniel DAMEO, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. James W. BARRETT; Cigna Financial Advisors, Inc.; Tri-Core, Inc.; Ronald Redfearn; and Epic Welfare Benefit and Trust, Defendants-Respondents, and Gerard T. Papetti and U.S. Financial Services Corporation, Defendants/Third-Party Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. Monumental Life Insurance
Grand Trunk West. R. Co. v. Acme Belt Recoatingpublic domain
859 F.Supp. 1125 (1994) GRAND TRUNK WESTERN RAILROAD COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. ACME BELT RECOATING, INC., et al., Defendants. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. GENERAL FOODS CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. Nos. 4:87-CV-364, 1:90-CV-397. United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Southern Division. August 12, 1994. *112
In re MFW Shareholders Litigationpublic domain
OPINION STRINE, Chancellor. I. Introduction This case presents a novel question of law. Here, MacAndrews & Forbes — a holding company whose equity is solely owned by defendant Ronald Perelman— owned 43% of M & F Worldwide (“MFW”). MacAndrews & Forbes offered to purchase the rest of the corporation’s equity in a going private merger for $24 per share. But upfront, MacA
Voda, M.D. v. Cordis Corporationpublic domain
Error: Bad annotation destination Error: Bad annotation destination United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 05-1238 JAN K. VODA, M.D., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CORDIS CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant. Mitchell G. S
Lester v. Exxon Mobil Corp.public domain
Eldon E. Fallon, U.S. District Court Judge *623Before the Court are two motions to dismiss without prejudice filed by Plaintiffs *624Herman LeBlanc, R. Doc. 569, and Donnie Beasley, R. Doc. 572. The motions are opposed. R. Doc. 579. Plaintiffs have filed a reply. R. Doc. 590. Havin