Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Diana Marie Cole”
Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL IV YASHIRA MARIE TORRES Apelación RODRÍGUEZ procedente del Tribunal de Apelante Primera Instancia, Sala KLAN202401046 Superio
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo ________________________ No. 07-11-00348-CV ________________________ ANNIE COLE TRUITT, APPELLANT V. SUSAN COLE BYARS AND WILLIAM C. COLE, APPELLEES
661 F.3d 914 (2011) PT Pukuafu INDAH; PT Tanjung Sera Pung; Leonard L.J. Young; PT Lebong Tandai; Gideon Minerals U.S.A., Inc., Plaintifs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION; Mary L. Schapiro; Export Import Bank of the United States; James H. Lambright; JPMorgan Chase & Co.; Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.; PricewaterhouseCoopers, L.L.C.; James Nelson Lane; New Canaan Society, Defendants, Newmont Mining Corp., Defend
Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Juan Adamepublic domain
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed September 1, 2022. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-21-00654-CV UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, Appellant V. JUAN ADAME, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF AMELIA ADAME (DECEASED); TONY ALVARADO; CAROLINE ANDREWS, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS REPRESENTATIVE OF JEROME JOHNSON, SR. (DECEASED); VANESSA BA
Mock v. South Dakota Board of Regentspublic domain
296 F.Supp.2d 1061 (2003) Mary MOCK; and Diana Cole, Plaintiffs, v. SOUTH DAKOTA BOARD OF REGENTS; University of South Dakota; Jack Doyle, acting in his official and individual capacities; Roger L. Kozak, acting in his official and individual capacities; and James W. Abbott, acting in his official and individual capacities, Defendants. No. CIV 00-4191. United States District Court, D. South Dakota, Sou
Mock v. South Dakota Board of Regentspublic domain
267 F.Supp.2d 1017 (2003) Mary MOCK; and Diana Cole, Plaintiffs, v. SOUTH DAKOTA BOARD OF REGENTS; University of South Dakota; Jack Doyle, acting in his official and individual capacities; Roger L. Kozak, acting in his official and individual capacities; and James W. Abbott, acting in his official and individual capacities, Defendants. No. CIV. 00-4191. United States District Court, D. South Dakota, So
United States v. Vancardo (In Re Vancardo)public domain
182 B.R. 543 (1995) In re Joseph S. and Betty VANCARDO, Debtors. UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. Joseph S. and Betty VANCARDO, Defendants. No. 4:93CV01101 GFG. United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, Eastern Division. May 25, 1995. Marc S. Kramer, St. Louis, MO, for Joseph S. Vancardo and Betty Vancardo. Jay P. Golder, U.S. Dept. of Justice,
ACCEPTED 03-15-00292-CV 6671739 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS
State of Delaware, ex rel. Kathleen Jennings, Attorney General of the State of Delaware v. BP America Inc.public domain
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE STATE OF DELAWARE, ex rel. ) KATHLEEN JENNINGS, Attorney ) General of the State of Delaware, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. N20C-09-097 MMJ CCLD ) BP AMERICA INC., BP P.L.C., ) CHEVRON CORPORATION, ) CHEVRON U.S.A. INC., ) CONOCOPHILLIPS,
C5 Medical Werks, LLC v. CeramTec GmbHpublic domain
R. Brooke Jackson, United States District Judge FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, AND ORDER OF JUDGMENT This case was tried to the Court from August 29, 2016 to September 8, 2016 and from October 3, 2016 to October 5, 2016. I. FINDINGS OF FACT A. The Parties. 1. Defendant/counter-plaintiff CeramTec GmbH (“CeramTec”) is a company that pr
C5 Medical Weeks, LLC v. CeramTec GmbHpublic domain
AMENDED FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, AND ORDER OF JUDGMENT R. Brooke Jackson, United States District Judge This case was tried to the Court from August 29, 2016 to September 8, 2016 and from October 3, 2016 to October 5, 2016. I. FINDINGS OF FACT A. The Parties. 1. Defendant/counter-plaintiff Ceram-Tec GmbH (“CeramTec”) is a compan
Adoption of Douglaspublic domain
These cases are appeals of consolidated care and protection petitions concerning six children — Douglas, Tom, Brian, Mark, Cole, and Frank. The appeals are brought by the biological mother of the six children; by the biological father of the two oldest children (father I) — Douglas and Tom; and by four of the children —Douglas, Tom, Brian, and Mark. They appeal from the provisions of decrees of the Juvenile Court
Thigpen v. Statepublic domain
Appeal from denial of writ of error coram nobis. The appellant was convicted on May 3, 1972, for the shotgun slaying of Cassie Lee Davis. He was sentenced to death in that case. However, on appeal to this court that sentence was modified to life imprisonment due to the intervening decision of the United States Supreme Court in Furman v. Georgia,408 U.S. 238, 92 S.Ct. 2726, 33 L.Ed.2d
Duffy v. Conawaypublic domain
295 Md. 242 (1983) 455 A.2d 955 PATRICK J. DUFFY v. MARY CONAWAY. PATRICK J. DUFFY v. MARY CONAWAY ET AL. PATRICK J. DUFFY v. STATE ADMINISTRATIVE BOARD OF ELECTION LAWS ET AL. [Nos. 112, September Term, 1982.] [Nos. 113, September Term, 1982.] [Nos. 114, September Term, 1982.] Court of Appeals of Maryland. Order filed October 29,
Romeo Longoria v. Exxon Mobil Corporationpublic domain
ACCEPTED Electronically Filed 04-15-00536-CV 8/11/2015 5:15:49 PM FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS Noe Guerra Jr., District Clerk SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS
David Gordan Schmidt (d/B/A ABC Bonding Company) and Greenbrier Equities, LLC v. Brenda Crawfordpublic domain
In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-18-00846-CV ——————————— DAVID GORDON SCHMIDT D/B/A ABC BONDING COMPANY AND GREENBRIAR EQUITIES, LLC, Appellants V. BRENDA CRAWFORD, CARLOS PEREZ, ANTHONY WILLIAMS, ANNIE J. BUTLER, ANTHO
in Re Nettie Bivenspublic domain
NUMBER 13-20-00563-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG IN RE NETTIE BIVENS, ET AL. On Petition for Writ of Injunction. MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Benavides, Longoria, and Tijerina Memorandum Opinion
Kloss v. RBS Citizens, N.A.public domain
OPINION AND ORDER OVERRULING PLAINTIFFS’ OBJECTIONS, ADOPTING MAGISTRATE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS THE COMPLAINT, DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION, AND DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION THOMAS L. LUDINGTON, District Judge. Plaintiffs Alfred R. Kloss and Diana C. Kloss commenced this case against Defendant RBS Citizens N.A., succ
Spreeuw v. Barkerpublic domain
385 S.C. 45 (2009) 682 S.E.2d 843 Diana SPREEUW, Respondent/Appellant, v. Douglas BARKER, Appellant/Respondent. No. 4602. Court of Appeals of South Carolina. Heard March 5, 2009. Decided July 29, 2009. *51 Gregory S. Forman, of Charleston, for Appellant/Respondent.
Boyd v. Columbiana Foods, Inc.public domain
[Cite as Boyd v. Columbiana Foods, Inc., 2022-Ohio-436.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT TRUMBULL COUNTY JAMES BOYD, et al., CASE NO. 2021-T-0028 Plaintiffs-Appellants, Civil Appeal from the -v- Court of Common Pleas COLUMBIANA FOODS, INC.