Cases

466 S.E.2d 171 (1995) 195 W.Va. 512 David D. GENTRY and Nancy Gentry, Petitioners Below, Appellants, v. R. Michael MANGUM, Sheriff of Raleigh County; and Paul H. Flanagan, Vernon P. Barley and Jack P. MacDonald, in their Official Capacity as the County Commission of Raleigh County, Defendants Below, Appellees. No. 22845. Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia.

JUSTICE BOWMAN delivered the opinion of the court: Defendant, Johnny Mangum, was convicted by a jury of second-degree murder (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1989, ch. 38, par. 9—2 (now 720 ILCS 5/9—2 (West 1992))), and the court sentenced him to a maximum extended term of 30 years in prison. He contends on appeal that the trial court improperly

88 Ariz. 326 (1960) 356 P.2d 643 Irving L. DIAMOND, dba Diamond Realty, Appellant, v. Kenneth G. HAYDIS and Patricia A. Haydis, his wife, and Karl Mangum, Appellees. No. 6582. Supreme Court of Arizona. October 26, 1960. *328 John H. Grace, Flagstaff, for appellant. Mangum & Christensen, Flagstaf

657 F.Supp. 1204 (1987) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Richard DIAMOND, Defendant. No. 86 Civ. 2121 (JMW). United States District Court, S.D. New York. April 14, 1987. Paul K. Milmed, U.S. Attys.' Office, S.D. N.Y., New York City, for plaintiff. Gregory J. Pond, of the firm Abbott & Bushlow, New York City, for defendant. WALKER, District J

466 F.2d 722 DIAMOND SHAMROCK CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, andFireman's Mutual Insurance Company, a Rhode Islandcorporation, Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.LUMBERMENS MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY, an Illinois corporation,Defendant-Appellant. No. 71-1594. United States Court of Appeals,Seventh Circuit. Argued June 2, 1972.Decided Aug. 29, 1972.Rehea

SPRECHER, Circuit Judge. This appeal is from a judgment in plaintiffs’ favor in an action for declaratory judgment on an insurance policy covering loss caused by accident at plaintiff Diamond Shamrock Corporation’s Deer Park, Texas, plant. We affirm in part and reverse in part. On April 30, 1967, an explosion and fire damaged a compressor and surrounding area at Diamond’s Deer Park plant. Diamond was cove

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA No. COA22-473 Filed 04 April 2023 Catawba County, No. 20-CVD-408 TONYA IRENE SARTOR WATSON, Plaintiff, v. THOMAS STEUART WATSON, Defendant. Appeal by plaintiff from judgment entered 15 July 2021 by Judge Robert A. Mullinax, Jr., in Catawba County District Court. Heard in the Court of Appeals 24 January 2023. Robinson and Lawing, LLP, by L. Br

541 F.Supp. 1236 (1982) INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. Jeffrey GROSSMAN, Defendant. No. 79 C 3417. United States District Court, N. D. Illinois, E. D. June 18, 1982. Eugene W. Beeler, Jr., Mangum, Beeler, Schad & Diamond, Chicago, Ill., for plaintiff. David H. Pauker, Juron, Pauker & Rubin, Ltd., Chicago, Ill., for defendant. <

PRESIDING JUSTICE WILSON delivered the opinion of the court: Plaintiffs, John and William Nordhem, each obtained judgments by confession in the amounts of $21,250 and $22,681.24, respectively, on individual promissory notes executed by defendants, Harold Re-skin, Robert Liston, Thomas Dubois and Thomas Gorsuch, individually1 and as shareholders of

HUNTER, JR., Robert N., Judge. Kim ("Kim") and Barry ("Barry") Lippard ("Plaintiffs") appeal the trial court's 5 April 2016 order dismissing with prejudice their defamation claim against Larry Holleman ("Holleman") and Alan Hix ("Hix") ("Defendants"). After de novo review, we vacate the 5 April 2016 order dismissing this action on jurisdictional grounds and remand this matter for a trial on the merits.

Opinion ROBIE, J. When a claimant seeks workers’ compensation benefits from the California Insurance Guarantee Association (CIGA) for a claim arising out of a car accident, is CIGA entitled to a credit for underinsured motorist benefits the claimant received for the same accident? Yes. Scott Mangum, the claimant in this workers’ compensation case, was injured in a car accident. After colle

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA No. COA18-1308 Filed: 4 August 2020 Wake County, No. 18 CVS 3241 SHEARON FARMS TOWNHOME OWNERS ASSOCIATION II, INC., Plaintiff, v. SHEARON FARMS DEVELOPMENT, LLC; DAN RYAN BUILDERS–NORTH CAROLINA, LLC; ABBINGTON HEIGHTS, LLC; JELD-WEN, INC., and JELD- WEN HOLDING, INC., Defendants. DAN RYAN BUILDERS–NORTH CAROLINA, LLC, Defendant/Third-P

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA No. COA18-1308 Filed: 4 August 2020 Wake County, No. 18 CVS 3241 SHEARON FARMS TOWNHOME OWNERS ASSOCIATION II, INC., Plaintiff, v. SHEARON FARMS DEVELOPMENT, LLC; DAN RYAN BUILDERS–NORTH CAROLINA, LLC; ABBINGTON HEIGHTS, LLC; JELD-WEN, INC., and JELD- WEN HOLDING, INC., Defendants. DAN RYAN BUILDERS–NORTH CAROLINA, LLC, Defendant/Third-P

PROST, Chief Judge. Appellants seek review of the district court’s summary judgment determination that U.S. Patent No. 7,604,929 (“’929 patent”) is invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 101. The district court concluded that the ’929 patent is directed to a patent-ineligible law of nature — that hepatoeytes are capable of surviving multiple freeze-thaw cycles — and tha

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Milton I. Shadur, Senior United States District Judge Defendants CellzDirect, Inc. and Invi-trogen Corp. (hereafter collectivized as “LTC,” the corporation that has succeeded to their interests) bring a motion for summary judgment of patent invalidity under 35 U.S.C. §§ 101 and 112 (Dkt. 335).1 Also pending is LTC’s Motion To Limit Damag

Justice Stevens delivered the opinion of the Court. New constitutional rules announced by this Court that place certain kinds of primary individual conduct beyond the power of the States to proscribe, as well as “watershed” rules of criminal procedure, must be applied in all future trials, all cases pending on direct review, and all federal habeas corpus proceedings. All other new rules of criminal procedure mu

Chief Justice TOAL. The Court granted Joshua Bell’s (Petitioner) petition for a writ of certiorari to review the court of appeals’ decision affirming the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Progressive Direct Insurance Company (Progressive). We affirm. Facts/Procedural Background Petitioner was injured in a car accident on March 31, 2006, while riding as a passenger in

DYK, Circuit Judge. Plaintiffs are the University of Utah Research Foundation, The Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania, HSC Research and Development Limited Partnership, Endorecherche, Inc., and Myriad Genetics, Inc. (collectively “Myriad”). Myriad owns U.S. Patent No. 5,753,441 (“the '441 patent”), U.S. Patent No. 5,747,282 (“the '282 patent”), and U.S. Patent No. 5,837,

GEER, Judge. Plaintiff Universal Cab Company, Inc.1 appeals the trial court's dismissal of its claims on the grounds that it lacks standing. On appeal, plaintiff argues that the complaint adequately alleges an injury that is traceable to defendants' actions, that the injury to plaintiff resulting from defendants' actions is not conjectural or hypothetical, and that, at a bare minimum, plaintiff has sta

Davis, Justice: This appeal was brought by the Petitioners, Gregory G. Poulos; Jason G. Poulos; Pamela F. Poulos; Shaun D. Rogers; Kevin H. Rogers; Derek B. Rogers; and T.G. Rogers, III (collectively “Petitioners”), defendants below, from an August 19, 2015, order of the Circuit Court of McDowell County that granted judgment in favor of the Respondent, LBR Holdings, LLC (“Respondent”), plaintiff below. This case was tried be