Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Diamond L Smith”
Smith v. Diamond Services Corp.public domain
ORDER AND REASONS JANE TRICHE MILAZZO, District Judge. Before the Court is Defendant Diamond Service’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Maintenance and Cure (R. Doc. 38). For the following reasons, the Motion is GRANTED. BACKGROUND This is a maritime personal injury suit. Plaintiff, Frederick Smith, was a deckhand employed by Defendant Diamond Servi
Diamond v. Reshkopublic domain
Opinion RUVOLO, P. J. I. INTRODUCTION Christine Diamond was injured while riding as a passenger in a taxi that was involved in a collision with another car. Diamond and her husband, Andrew (the Diamonds), brought a negligence action against the drivers and owners of each vehicle. The Diamonds settled their
Double Diamond-Delaware, Inc. v. Alfonsopublic domain
OPINION Opinion by Justice Rodriguez ■ Appellants Double Diamond-Delaware, Inc., Double Diamond, Inc., White Bluff Club Corporation, National Resort Management Company, R. Michael Ward, Fred Curran, and White Bluff’Property Owners Association, Inc. (WBPOA) (collectively, Double Diamond) appeal from the trial court’s rulings (a) denying their motion' to transfer venue, and (b) granting a pa
Brownfield Restoration Group, L.L.C. v. Trickettpublic domain
DIANE V. GRENDELL, J. {¶ 1} Defendant/third party plaintiff-appellant, Howard J. Trickett, appeals from the judgment of the Portage County Court of Common Pleas, granting judgment in favor of plaintiff-appellee, Brownfield Restoration Group (BRG), on its claim for Breach of Contract, and dismissing his counterclaim for Fraudulent Inducement. The issues to be determined by this court are
Smith v. Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc.public domain
ORDER KENT, District Judge. • The Plaintiff brought this action after he was injured when the cab of the crane he was operating became disengaged from its pedestal mounts. Now pending before the Court is the Plaintiffs Motion to Compel the Defendant to respond to certain Interrogatories and Requests for Production. For the reasons, set forth below, the Motion is hereby GRANTED IN PART and DENIE
ReedHycalog UK, Ltd. v. Diamond Innovations Inc.public domain
727 F.Supp.2d 543 (2010) REEDHYCALOG UK, LTD. and ReedHycalog, LP, Plaintiffs, v. DIAMOND INNOVATIONS INC., Defendant. Case No. 6:08-CV-325. United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Tyler Division. August 2, 2010. *544 Danny Lloyd Williams (lead attorney), Christopher Needham Cravey, David Wynne Morehan, J. Mike Amerson, James A
Atlanta Public Schools v. Diamondpublic domain
583 S.E.2d 500 (2003) 261 Ga. App. 641 ATLANTA PUBLIC SCHOOLS v. DIAMOND. No. A03A0092. Court of Appeals of Georgia. June 13, 2003. *501 Elarbee, Thompson, Sapp & Wilson, Brent L. Wilson, William A. Pinto, Jr., Atlanta, for appellant. Theodore G. Frankel, Atlanta, for appellee. MILLER, Ju
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER MUSGRAVE, Judge: On a USCIT Rule 56.2 motion for judgment on the negative material injury determination by the U.S. International Trade Commission (“ITC” or “Commission”) on its antidumping petition, the plaintiff Diamond Sawblades’ Manufacturer’s Coalition (“DSMC”) filed a reply brief embodying 15 pages of text plus
265 B.R. 707 (2001) In re DIAMOND INDUSTRIAL CORPORATION, Debtor. Diamond Industrial Corporation, Plaintiff, v. Luz Alakrah, Errol Browne, Juliana Stanislas, Maricia Walters, Garfield Saunders, Arleen Smith, Juan Batista, Matthew Wilfred, Rita Wilfred, Stedroy Morton, Paulette Morton, Ruben Ayala, Albert Huggins, Graciela Davis, James Gumbs, Elista Frederick, Ralph Mathew, Norma Torres, Ana Rosa Morales, Jose Rivera, Luz Percy, and Carmen Gon
Smith v. Diamondpublic domain
421 N.E.2d 1172 (1981) Dale F. SMITH, Appellant (Plaintiff below), v. Aubrey A. DIAMOND, Appellee (Defendant below). No. 2-980A305. Court of Appeals of Indiana, Fourth District. June 24, 1981. *1173 William E. Beck, II, Martin & Beck, Kokomo, for appellant (plaintiff below). Eugene O. Maley, Dennis N. Owens, Smith, Mal
Diamond Resorts Int'l, Inc. v. Aaronsonpublic domain
ROY B. DALTON JR., United States District Judge Plaintiffs Diamond Resorts International, Inc., Diamond Resorts U.S. Collection Development, LLC, Diamond Resorts Hawaii Collection Development, LLC, and Diamond Resorts Management, Inc. (collectively, "Diamond ") sued Defendants Austin N. Aaronson ("Mr. Aaronson ") and Aaronson, Austin, PA ("Aaronson Law Firm ") (collectively, "
Proe v. Diamond Homespublic domain
OSCN Found Document:Proe et al. v. Diamond Homes et al. Previous Case Top Of Index This Point in Index Citationize Next Case P
Diamond v. Schweitzerpublic domain
Filed 3/24/25; Modified and certified for partial publication 4/21/25 (order attached) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT ZACKARY DIAMOND, as represented, etc., F086150 Plaintiff and Appellant, (Super. Ct. No. BCV-20-100707)
Annabelle Clinton Imber, Justice. Laura Cullen, on behalf of herself and all other taxpayers similarly situated, filed a lawsuit in Pulaski County Chancery Court1 to challenge certain appropriation bills adopted by the General Assembly of 1997.2 The first amended complaint was filed August 26, 1999, and named the following defendants: A
Diamond McCattle Company, L.L.C. and BWW Holdings, L.L.C. v. Range Louisiana Operating, LLCpublic domain
Judgment rendered April 14, 2021. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 2166, La. C.C.P. No. 53,896-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA ***** DIAMOND MCCATTLE COMPANY, L.L.C.
Smith v. Orthopedics International, Ltd.public domain
fl Prohibited ex parte contact as described in Loudon v. Mhyre1 does not apply to transmittal of public documents to an attorney representing a nonparty treating physician. The underlying public policy enunciated in Loudon was to protect the patient’s privacy from release of any extraneous medical information not germane to the issue at trial. Here, there was no such risk as no information w
Fry v. Diamond Construction, Inc.public domain
659 A.2d 241 (1995) Robert Lee FRY, II, Appellant, v. DIAMOND CONSTRUCTION, INC., Appellee. No. 93-CV-1294. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Argued April 26, 1995. Decided June 1, 1995. *243 Marc Fiedler, with whom Roger C. Johnson and Lisa L. Riggs, Washington, DC, were on the brief, for appellant.
Dico, Inc. v. Diamondpublic domain
BOWMAN, Circuit Judge. Dico, Inc. brought suit against the United States Environmental Protection Agency and others (collectively, the EPA), seeking reimbursement for the response costs it has incurred, and will incur in the future, in complying with an administrative order issued by the EPA requiring Dico to clean up a contaminated groundwater site in Des Moines, Iowa. The District Court granted summary judgment in favor of t
Resolution Trust Corp. v. Diamondpublic domain
801 F.Supp. 1152 (1992) RESOLUTION TRUST CORPORATION, as receiver of Nassau Savings and Loan Association, F.A., Plaintiff, v. Selma DIAMOND, Ira Kaufman, Jerome Lederer, Peggy Lehman, Susan Solomon Pattullo, Lloyd Ribner, as executor of the estate of Muriel Ribner, deceased, Horace Solomon, Lillian Solomon, Denise Tucker, Angelo Aponte, Commissioner of the Division of Housing and Community Renewal of the State of New York, and Robert Abrams, Atto
Diamond v. TF Cornerstone Inc.public domain
Diamond v TF Cornerstone Inc. (2023 NY Slip Op 06473) Diamond v TF Cornerstone Inc. 2023 NY Slip Op 06473 Decided on December 19, 2023 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judicia