Cases

REPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND No. 1920 September Term, 2015 _________________________ ANTHONY LEWIS, et al. v. BALTIMORE CONVENTION CENTER, et al. _________________________ Kehoe, Nazarian, Shaw Geter, JJ. _________________________ Opinion by Nazarian, J. _________________________ Filed: December 1, 2016

Nazarian, J. A class of employees of the Baltimore Convention Center (the “Class”) appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court for Baltimore City dismissing their claims against the City of Baltimore (the “City”) and their union, AFSCME Local 44 (the “Union”). The Class had alleged that the City breached its contract with the Union by

Amit P. Mehta, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION Dissatisfied with Defendant Clark Nexsen, Inc.'s ("Clark Nexsen" or "Defendant") services related to the construction of a $10 million tennis and education facility in Southeast Washington, D.C., Plaintiff Washington Tennis & Education Foundation, Inc. ("WTEF" or "Plaintiff") brought this lawsuit against Clark Nexsen, asserting two clai

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _________________________________________ ) WASHINGTON TENNIS & EDUCATION ) FOUNDATION, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 15-cv-02254 (APM)

MEMORANDUM OPINION Paul W. Grimm, United States District Judge This labor dispute involves local union members; the national organization American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees International (“AFSCME” or “AFSCME International”); the Association of Classified Employees of the Prince George’s County School System (“Local 2250” or “ACE”), and Local 2250’s Executive Board members (“Executiv

Per Curiam. This is a motion by the plaintiff for relief following the trial courts dismissal of his notice of appeal and denial of his motion to file an amended notice of appeal. The relevant procedural chronology is as follows: The plaintiff commenced this action in 1993 to recover for the alleged breach of contract, breach of implied covenant of good faith, unjust enrichment, negligence, and G.L.c. 93A unfai

ADKINS, J. In this case, we determine the proper measure of lost profit damages in a breach of contract case, a question uncommon for our docket. We also review the rare situation when a trial court has permitted a litigant to discover and introduce into evidence communications between an opposing party and its attorneys, based on an implied waiver of the attorney-client privilege via testimony. Finally, we answer four other