⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

8 opinions for “Deyoung v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp.”

Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995-06-12 · Published · cited 13× · 661 A.2d 1375; 443 Pa. Super. 386
443 Pa. Superior Ct. 386 (1995) 661 A.2d 1375 Juanita COBBS, Administratrix of the Estate of Thomas Cobbs v. ALLIED CHEMICAL CORPORATION, Johns-Manville Corporation, Philip Carey Corporation, and Keene Corporation, and Celotex Corporation, v. EAGLE PICHER, Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., Owens-Illinois, Inc., Pittsburgh-Corning Corp., GAF Corp., and Pacor. Appeal of OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC. (TWO CASES)
United States Court of Claims · 1985-07-29 · Published · cited 0× · 8 Cl. Ct. 546; 33 Cont. Cas. Fed. 73,742; 1985 U.S. Claims LEXIS 942
OPINION SETO, Judge. In this government contract case, a subcontractor has attempted to sue the United States directly, claiming it has been assigned all of the prime contractor’s claims against the government. The underlying issues raised by defendant’s motion to dismiss are: (1) whether the Assignment of Claims Act precludes a subcontractor from suing the government as an assignee; (2) whether the Severi
Appellate Court of Illinois · 2000-09-20 · Published · cited 0×
Third Division September 20, 2000 No. 1-99-2938 MARSHA JONES , Individually and as Special ) Appeal from the Administrator of the Estate of ANDREW JONES, ) Circuit Court of and JOHNNY JONES, ) Cook County. ) Plaintiffs-Appelle
Appellate Court of Illinois · 2000-09-20 · Published · cited 81× · 738 N.E.2d 542; 250 Ill. Dec. 326; 316 Ill. App. 3d 1121
738 N.E.2d 542 (2000) 316 Ill.App.3d 1121 250 Ill.Dec. 326 Marsha JONES, Individually and as Special Administrator of the Estate of Andrew Jones, and Johnny Jones, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. CHICAGO OSTEOPATHIC HOSPITAL, Defendant-Appellant. No. 1-99-2938. Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, Third Division. September 20, 20
Lambert v. Kysarpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993-03-12 · Published · cited 0×
March 12, 1993 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT No. 91-2244 GEORGE LAMBERT, d/b/a RAINBOW FRUIT, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. SAM KYSAR AND JOAN KYSAR, d/b/a LEWIS RIVER TREE FARM, Defendants, Appellees. No. 92-1029 GEORGE LAMBERT, d/b/a
Lambert v. Kysarpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993-03-12 · Published · cited 0×
USCA1 Opinion March 12, 1993 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT No. 91-2244 GEORGE LAMBERT, d/b/a RAINBOW FRUIT, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. SAM KYSAR AND JOAN KYSAR,
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993-01-13 · Published · cited 315× · 983 F.2d 1110; 1993 WL 4830
CYR, Circuit Judge. George Lambert appeals a district court order dismissing his lawsuit for improper venue. We affirm. I BACKGROUND Appellant Lambert owns and operates the Rainbow Fruit Company in Boston, Massachusetts, which sells Christmas trees and wreaths at retail during the holiday season. App