⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

9 opinions for “Dewayne Conner and Michele Conner”

Brand v. Motleypublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008-05-23 · Published · cited 375× · 526 F.3d 921; 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 11082; 2008 WL 2151638
526 F.3d 921 (2008) Dewayne BRAND, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John D. MOTLEY; Kathy Litteral; Michelle Vance, Defendants-Appellees. No. 06-6362. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Argued: April 25, 2008. Decided and Filed: May 23, 2008. *922 ARGUED: Elizabeth M. Locke, Kirkland & Ellis, Washington, D
Brand v. Motleypublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008-05-23 · Published · cited 0×
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 File Name: 08a0196p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ X Plaintiff-Appellant, - DEWAYNE BRAND,
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2015-06-12 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 01-15-00390-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 6/12/2015 9:25:40 PM
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018-08-09 · Published · cited 0×
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 17-3134 ___________________________ Craig Lyons, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated; Justin Anderson, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated; Tommy Applegate, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated; Brandon Etzkorn, I
Ex Parte Edwardspublic domain
Supreme Court of Alabama · 2001-01-12 · Published · cited 25× · 816 So. 2d 98; 2001 WL 29232
Because I believe the trial judge did not err in refusing to instruct the jury as requested by the defendant, I must respectfully dissent. Punishing a defendant for unintentionally causing the death of another while in the commission of a misdemeanor is not a new legal concept, in either a criminal case or a civil case. For example, in Pippin v. State,19 Ala. App. 384, 387, 97 So. 615<
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002-04-17 · Published · cited 5× · 52 Fed. Cl. 881; 287 F.3d 1076; 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 7223; 82 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 41,082; 88 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1066; 2002 WL 654368
DYK, Circuit Judge, dissenting. In endorsing a facial challenge to a memorandum, and in holding that the memorandum must be assumed to dictate racial and gender discrimination without a factual hearing, the majority acts contrary to Supreme Court precedent and our own decision in Baker v. United States, 127 F.3d 1081 (Fed.Cir.1997). The majority’s approach is unsupported by any decision of the Supreme
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018-08-09 · Published · cited 12× · 899 F.3d 567
WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge. Employees of Conagra Foods Packaged Foods, LLC, (ConAgra) appeal the dismissal of their claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 201, et seq. , and the Arkansas Minimum Wage Act, Ark. Code § 11-4-201, et seq. , arguing that factual disputes preclude summary j