⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

11 opinions for “Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. Frias”

District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017-11-08 · Published · cited 0× · 235 So. 3d 972
SUAREZ, J. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company (“Bank”) appeals from a final order granting homeowner Maria de Brito’s (“Appel-lee”) motion for involuntary dismissal of the Bank’s complaint in foreclosure. We reverse. In 2006, Appellee’s husband, Alfredo Brito, entered into an adjustable rate mortgage with a negati
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025-08-13 · Published · cited 0× · 2025 NY Slip Op 04687
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v Olivo (2025 NY Slip Op 04687) Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v Olivo 2025 NY Slip Op 04687 Decided on August 13, 2025 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
District Court, W.D. Washington · 2015-06-10 · Published · cited 0× · 550 B.R. 860; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 171477
ORDER Thomas S. Zilly, United States District Judge Appellant has not made a payment toward her mortgage since December 2009. When non-judicial foreclosure proceedings were initiated, appellant filed for bankruptcy, thus halting the foreclosure. Before the bankruptcy court, appellant argued that the foreclosure should be enjoined and she should be awarded damages because, among other things, defendants al
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017-05-31 · Published · cited 2× · 220 So. 3d 517; 2017 WL 2350135; 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 7839
Klingensmith, J. Appellant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“Bank”) appeals the involuntary dismissal of its foreclosure case against appellee Mara Elizabeth Eisenberg (“Borrower”). The trial court based' the dismissal on Bank’s failure to adequately prove damages. Bank alleges two grounds for reversal: 1) that the trial court erred by preventing Bank from admitting into evidence the portion of the loan payment history initially gene
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2018-12-11 · Published · cited 45× · 910 F.3d 544
PONSOR, District Judge. Anthony Sinapi, an individual with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and anxiety, sought certain accommodations to assist him in taking the Rhode Island bar exam. The Rhode Island Board of Bar Examiners (the Board) denied his request and, on review, the Chief Justice of the Rhode Island Supreme Court denied his petition for reversal of the Board's
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025-07-24 · Published · cited 0×
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT GILA RIVER INDIAN No. 23-2743 COMMUNITY, a federally D.C. No. recognized Indian tribe, 4:19-cv-00407- SHR Plaintiff - Appellee, SAN CARLOS APACHE TRIBE, OPINION Intervenor-Plaintiff -
Court of Appeals of Washington · 2021-12-06 · Published · cited 0×
THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON CHRISTOPHER LARSON and ANGELA No. 80968-7-I LARSON, DIVISION ONE Appellants, PUBLISHED OPINION v. SNOHOMISH COUNTY, a Washington State Municipal Corporation; CAROLYN WEIKEL, individually and as the SNOHOMISH COUNTY AUDITOR and Registrar; SONJA KRASKI, individually and as the SNOHOMISH COUNTY CLERK; JANE DOE, individu
Court of Appeals of Washington · 2021-12-06 · Published · cited 0×
THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON CHRISTOPHER LARSON and ANGELA No. 80968-7-I LARSON, DIVISION ONE Appellants, PUBLISHED OPINION v. SNOHOMISH COUNTY, a Washington State Municipal Corporation; CAROLYN WEIKEL, individually and as the SNOHOMISH COUNTY AUDITOR and Registrar; SONJA KRASKI, individually and as the SNOHOMISH COUNTY CLERK; JANE DOE, individu
District Court, W.D. Washington · 2016-03-23 · Published · cited 11× · 180 F. Supp. 3d 798; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 76177; 2016 WL 3093255
ORDER The Honorable Richard A. Jones, United States District Court I. INTRODUCTION This matter comes before the Court on Defendant Northwest Trust Services, Inc.’s (“NWTS”) Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. # 54), Defendant Bank of America National Association’s (“BOA”) Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. # 56), and Defendants Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. (“SPS”) and Mortgage Electronic Registration Sys
Washington Supreme Court · 2026-04-30 · Published · cited 0×
FILE THIS OPINION WAS FILED FOR RECORD AT 8 A.M. ON IN CLERK’S OFFICE APRIL 30, 2026 SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WASHINGTON APRIL 30, 2026 SARAH R. PENDLETON