Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
11 opinions for “Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. Foxx”
Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. Foxxpublic domain
ORDER MARY S. SCRIVEN, District Judge. THIS CAUSE comes before the Court for consideration of the Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 8) filed jointly by Plaintiff Deutsche Bank National Trust Company (“Deutsche *1111Bank”) and Third-Party Defendant Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC (“Ocwen”); and the Response in opposition thereto (Dkt. 9) filed by Def
Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. Foxxpublic domain
ORDER MARY S. SCRIVEN, District Judge. THIS CAUSE comes before the Court for consideration of Defendant George J. Foxx’s Opposition to Notice of Removal by Ocwen and Deutsche Bank, which this Court construes as a motion to remand, (Dkt. 5) and the Response in opposition thereto filed by Third-Party Defendant, Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC (“Ocwen”), and Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Deutsche Bank
Bozek v. Bank of America, N.A.public domain
Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to Illinois Official Reports the accuracy and
People v. Dobbinspublic domain
2024 IL App (1st) 230566 SECOND DIVISION September 30, 2024 No. 1-23-0566 ______________________________________________________________________________ IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS
People v. Calvillopublic domain
2022 IL App (1st) 200886 Opinion filed: September 15, 2022 FIRST DISTRICT FOURTH DIVISION No. 1-20-0886 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, ) Appeal from the ) Circuit Court of
Light v. Seterus, Inc.public domain
JAMES I. COHN, United States District Judge THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Defendant Seterus, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss Count II of Plaintiff's Complaint [DE 7] ("Motion"). The Court has considered the Motion, Plaintiff's Response [DE 9], Defendant's Reply [DE 10], and the record in this case, and is otherwise advised in the premises. I. Background On August 3, 20
Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to Illinois Official Reports the accuracy and
People v. Rodriguezpublic domain
Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to Illinois Official Reports the accuracy and
People v. Terrellpublic domain
2022 IL App (1st) 192184 FIRST DISTRICT FOURTH DIVISION March 31, 2022 No. 1-19-2184 ) Appeal from the THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS,
In re L.K.public domain
Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to the Illinois Official Reports accuracy and integrity of this document
In re Q.P.public domain
2022 IL App (1st) 220354 No. 1-22-0354 Opinion filed September 7, 2022 Third Division ______________________________________________________________________________ IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS