Cases

OPINION OF THE COURT Lillian Wan, J. In this child protective proceeding, the issue before the court is the admissibility of the out of court statements of a child who is not named as a subject child in the article 10 petition. Based on the record that is currently before the court, the court finds that these statements are inadmissible under Family Court Act § 1046 (a) (vi). On May 8,

Wood, Chief Judge. Like many jurisdictions, Indiana has turned to "drug courts" to tackle substance-abuse problems more flexibly than traditional sentencing regimes might allow. *838

ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge: On November 14, 2017, the Defendants filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiff's complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Dkt. 19. On August 27, 2018, Magistrate Judge Barbara Moses recommended that this Court dismiss all of Plaintiff's claims. Dkt. 62. Plaintiff filed objections on September 7, 2018. Dkt. 65. Defendants responded to these objections on September 20, 2018. Dkt. 66.

MEMORANDUM * Destiny Tool (“Destiny”), SGS Tools Company (“SGS”), and Dauphin Precision Tool, LLC (“Dauphin”), all manufacture and sell carbide end mills, precision cutting heads that have many industrial uses. SGS and Dauphin (collectively, “Defendants”) own U.S. Patent No. 5,049,009 (“the '009 patent”), which claims an improved rotary cutting end mill. In 2004, Defendants filed suit in the Northern Distric

MEMORANDUM * Destiny Tool (“Destiny”), SGS Tools Company (“SGS”), and Dauphin Precision Tool, LLC (“Dauphin”), all manufacture and sell carbide end mills, precision cutting heads that have many industrial uses. SGS and Dauphin (collectively, “Defendants”) own U.S. Patent No. 5,049,009 (“the '009 patent”), which claims an improved rotary cutting end mill. In 2004, Defendants filed suit in the Northern Distric

(2008) LCO DESTINY, LLC, Plaintiff, v. MICHAELS STORES, INC., Michaels Stores Procurement Company Inc., BP Industries Incorporated, Defendant(s). No. 07-CV-1140. United States District Court, N.D. New York. February 13, 2008. DECISION & ORDER THOMAS J. McAVOY, Senior District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff LCO Destiny,

Per Curiam. {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of Cleveland v. Washington Mut. Bank, 125 Ohio St.3d 541, 2010-Ohio-2219, — N.E.2d-, 2010 WL 2134307, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings not inconsistent with Cleveland v. Washington Mut

405 F.Supp.2d 1127 (2005) ACACIA MEDIA TECHNOLOGIES CORP., Plaintiff, v. NEW DESTINY INTERNET GROUP, et al., Defendants. And All Related and/or Consolidated Actions. No. C05-01114. United States District Court, N.D. California, San Jose Division. December 7, 2005. *1128 *1129 Alan P. Block

MAINE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT Reporter of Decisions Decision: 2024 ME 66 Docket: Oxf-23-60 Argued January 10, 2024 Decided: August 20, 2024 Panel: STANFILL, C.J., and MEAD, HORTON, CONNORS, LAWRENCE, and DOUGLAS, JJ. IN RE CHILDREN OF DESTINY H. STANFILL, C.J. [¶1] The mother of two children appeals from (1) a judgment of the District Court (South Paris, Ham‐Thompson, J.) terminating

Matter of Destiny F. (Melissa F.) (2023 NY Slip Op 03120) Matter of Destiny F. (Melissa F.) 2023 NY Slip Op 03120 Decided on June 9, 2023 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Jud

Order entered October 8, 2020 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-20-00716-CV DESTINY BERKLEY, Appellant V. REGAL CROSSING APARTMENTS, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3 Dallas County, Texas

11/03/2021 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs October 5, 2021 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. DESTINY HALL Appeal from the Circuit Court for Henderson County No. 19-243-3 Kyle C. Atkins, Judge ___________________________________

Matter of Destiny F. (Melissa F.) (2022 NY Slip Op 06345) Matter of Destiny F. (Melissa F.) 2022 NY Slip Op 06345 Decided on November 10, 2022 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant t

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 17-1622 Filed September 12, 2018 STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. DESTINY SUMPTER, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Boone County, James B. Malloy (motion to suppress) and Paul G. Crawford (trial), District Associate Judges. Destiny Sumpter ap

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 17-2750 DESTINY HOFFMAN, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. SUSAN KNOEBEL, et al., Defendants-Appellees. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs June 2, 2016 IN RE DESTINY S. Appeal from the Juvenile Court for Putnam County No. 15JT7 John P. Hudson, Judge ___________________________________ No. M2016-00098-COA-R3-PT – Filed August 4, 2016 _____________________

Order entered July 2, 2021 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-21-00048-CV ERNESTINA GARCIA, Appellant V. RACHEL RUCKER, RICKY AVINA, AND DESTINY RUCKER, Appellees On Appeal from the 95th District Court Dallas County, Texas

231 P.3d 840 (2010) In re the Termination of Destiny ROBERTS and Andrew Roberts. No. 84132-2. Supreme Court of Washington. May 7, 2010. ORDER ¶ 1 Department I of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Madsen and Justices C. Johnson, Sanders, Owens and J. Johnson, considered this matter at its April 27, 2010, Motion Calendar and unanimously agreed to continue

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS JAREN, L.L.C., Appellant, v. MARIETTA DIANA RODRIGUEZ AND ROBERT WARICK, INDEPENDENT ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF DESTINY RODRIGUEZ, DECEASED, AND TIFFANY MICHELLE RODRIGUEZ AND BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY,

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS JAREN, L.L.C., § No. 08-10-00041-CV Appellant, § Appeal from the v. § County Court at Law No. 3 MARIETTA DIANA RODRIGUEZ AND R