Cases

OPINION DAVID R. FARMER, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which ALAN E. HIGHERS, P.J., W. S„ and HOLLY M. KIRBY, J., joined. This appeal arises from a prolonged divorce action. On appeal, Father challenges the trial court’s determinations regarding parenting time, child support, alimony, and the

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DESIREE MARTINEZ, No. 17-17492 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 1:15-cv-00683-JAM- MJS CITY OF CLOVIS; SANGER CITY; CHANNON HIGH; KYLE OPINION PENNINGTON; KIM PENNINGTON; CONNIE PENNI

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS FEDERAL CORPORATION, INC., § Appellant, § v. No. 08-16-00095-CV § DESIREE TRUHLAR, CARLOS

MEMORANDUM. ***1004**806The order of the Appellate Division, insofar as appealed from, should be affirmed, with costs, and the certified question answered in the affirmative. We conclude that the courts below properly dismissed plaintiff Skanska USA Building In

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by her brief, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Ambro, J.), imposed April 25, 2016, upon her plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive. Ordered that the sentence is affirmed. The defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived her right to appeal (see People v Bryant,

OPINION STOWERS, Justice. I. INTRODUCTION This appeal concerns a dispute between three daughters regarding the administration of their deceased mother's estate. The dispute centered around three documents: (1) a will executed in 1987; (2) a revised will the decedent allegedly executed in 2007 or 2008, which contained a clause revoking all prior wills; and (8) an exhibit that was allegedly

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ COMPLAINT Lawrence L. Piersol, United States District Judge Defendants, two Lower Brule Sioux Tribal Council members (tribal Defendants) and three United States government officials (government Defendants) (all Defendants collectively, “Defendants”), filed motions to dismiss Plaintiffs’ Complaint pursuant to Rule of Civil Pro

*464 POST-TRIAL MEMORANDUM OF DECISION SEAN H. LANE, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE Before the Court are the merits of the above-captioned adversary proceeding commenced by Kantrowitz, Goldhamer & Graifman, P.C. (the “Plaintiff’ or “KGG”) in the Chapter 7 proceeding of Roger Allen Mason (the “Debtor” or the “Defendant”). The Pl

Skanska USA Bldg. Inc. v Atlantic Yards B2 Owner, LLC (2018 NY Slip Op 02828) Skanska USA Bldg. Inc. v Atlantic Yards B2 Owner, LLC 2018 NY Slip Op 02828 [31 NY3d 1002] April 26, 2018 Court of Appeals Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.</

—In a child support proceeding pursuant to the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act (Family Ct Act art 5-B), the petitioner appeals from an order of the Family Court, Dutchess County "(Forman, J.), entered March 6, 2002, which denied its objections to an order of the same court (Kaufman, H.E.), entered November 20, 2001, which, after a hearing, inter alia, awarded child support in the sum of only $81 per month. Ordered that the order is m

¶ 1. Insurer, Lloyd’s of London, appeals the superior court’s grant of summary judgment to its insured, Desiree DeBartolo. Insurer argues that the superior court erred: (1) in concluding that the policy it issued to insured provided coverage for damage to a restaurant property she owned, and (2) in finding that insured did not deliberately conceal that she had reopened the restaurant before the loss. We affirm. ¶2. The facts, which we

GUIDRY, Judge. ^Defendant, Joe Johnson, appeals from his guilty plea conviction for possession with intent to distribute marijuana and his sentence to seven and one-half years at hard labor. For the reasons which follow, we affirm the conviction and sentence. The Jefferson Parish District Attorney filed a bill of information charging the Defendant with possession with intent to distribute marijuana within

589 S.E.2d 157 (2003) In re Barbara Marie Desiree HOWELL, DOB: 6-30-1995, A Minor Juvenile. No. COA03-85. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. December 16, 2003. *158 David A. Perez, Thomasville, for petitioner-appellee Gaston County Department of Social Services. Hall & Hall, Attorneys at Law, P.C., by Douglas L. Hall, Newland

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 21-4016 ___________________________ Donna M. Reece, as personal representative of the Estate of Amos Reece, deceased lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee v. Officer Hale, individually as an officer of the Gravett

[Cite as State v. Alves, 2022-Ohio-4684.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT ALLEN COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, CASE NO. 1-21-46 v. MICHELLE L. ALVES, OPINION DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. Appeal from Allen County Common Pleas Court T

*850Owens, J. ¶1 In 2005, Robert May violated a domestic violence protection order that prohibited him from contacting his ex-wife. As a result, May was convicted, under a city of Seattle ordinance, of violating the protection order. May contends that the order he is charged with violating is invalid and that he lacked notice that violating the no-contact provision of the

OPINION AND ORDER WILLIAM S. DUFFEY, JR., District Judge. This matter is before the Court on the SunTrust Defendants’1 Motion for Reconsideration [128], Defendant Ernst & Young LLP’s (“E & Y”) Motion for Reconsideration [129], SunTrust Defendants’ Motion for Rule 11 Sanctions Against *1214

Madsen, J. (concurring/dissenting) — I write separately to express my disagreement with the majority’s conclusion that Edward Rembert’s hearsay statement was properly admitted as an excited utterance. The statement does not qualify as an excited utterance, and its admission violated Coveil Thomas’s confrontation clause rights as well as ER 802. ANALYSIS The he

*400MARKMAN, J. (dissenting), Following a jury trial, defendant was convicted of involuntary manslaughter under MCL 750.321, which carries a statutory maximum sentence of 15 years. The trial court sentenced defendant to a term of 8 to 15 years after departing upward from the statutory sentencing guidelines range of 43

197 Ga. App. 133 (1990) 397 S.E.2d 728 BLACKMON v. THE STATE. A90A1441. Court of Appeals of Georgia. Decided October 2, 1990. John D. McCord III, for appellant. Robert E. Wilson, District Attorney, Desiree L. Sutton, Shawn E. LaGrua, Assistant District Attorneys, for appellee. McMURRAY, Presiding Judge. Defe