⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Design Concepts Dev v. United Fire & Cas Co”

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2018-12-11 · Published · cited 5× · 356 F. Supp. 3d 457
II. Analysis The parties properly invoke our diversity jurisdiction, requiring we apply federal procedural law and Pennsylvania substantive law governing the interpretation of insurance contracts.22 The parties argue our decision turns on a single question of law: is Julia Morath's death by suicide an "occurrence," defined as an "accident," triggering State Farm's duty to defend under Pennsylvan
District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2019-07-23 · Published · cited 14× · 390 F. Supp. 3d 964
JAMES D. PETERSON, District Judge Luke Cain bought a bathtub faucet adapter from a third-party seller on Amazon.com. The adapter malfunctioned and flooded Cain's home, which was insured by plaintiff State Farm and Casualty Company. State Farm paid to repair Cain's home, and now it has sued Amazon.com, Inc. for strict product liability under
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018-09-19 · Published · cited 0×
16‐2999‐cv (L) Hartford Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp. v. Interstate Fire & Cas. Co. United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit August Term 2017 (Argued: May 29, 2018 Decided: September 19, 201
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018-09-19 · Published · cited 18× · 905 F.3d 84
JACOBS, Circuit Judge: *87This diversity suit concerns insurance under second-layer excess liability contracts, issued 1978-85, for four claims that were brought against the insured, the Hartford Roman Catholic Diocesan Corporation ("Archdiocese"), and that arose from sexual misconduct by priests of the Archdiocese. Interstate Fire & Casualty
Court of Appeals of Utah · 2021-07-01 · Published · cited 3× · 495 P.3d 755; 2021 UT App 71
2021 UT App 71 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS DIVERSIFIED CONCEPTS LLC; DARIN DYELL; AND LANDFORM DESIGN GROUP PC, Appellants, v. JILL KOFORD AND ROD KOFORD, Appellees. Opinion No. 20191071-CA Filed July 1, 2021 Second District Court, Ogden Department
District Court, D. New Mexico · 2019-02-07 · Published · cited 30× · 361 F. Supp. 3d 1045
James O. Browning, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE *1057THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Defendant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings and Memorandum of Law in Support, filed April 4, 2018 (Doc. 58)("MJP"). The Court held a hearing on August 10, 2018. The primary issues are: (i) whether Defendant Financial Indemnity
New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2021-02-11 · Published · cited 5× · 488 P.3d 707; 2021 NMCA 020
Office of the Director New Mexico Compilation 09:40:50 2021.06.24 Commission '00'06- IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO Opinion Number: 2021-NMCA-020 Filing Date: February 11, 2021 N
District Court, District of Columbia · 2019-02-04 · Published · cited 2× · 360 F. Supp. 3d 31
DOUGLAS P. WOODLOCK, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Plaintiffs bring suit against their insurance company for breach of contract and for violations of the Massachusetts Consumer Protection Act, M.G.L. c. 93A, based on a dispute between them concerning an insurance claim for losses caused by the formation of ice dams and subsequent water leakage into their residence. The insurer now seeks summary judgment. I. B
Illinois Supreme Court · 2021-09-23 · Published · cited 41× · 184 N.E.3d 203; 451 Ill. Dec. 616; 2021 IL 126446
2021 IL 126446 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS (Docket No. 126446) JARRET SPROULL, Appellee, v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, Appellant. Opinion filed September 23, 2021. JUSTICE
Vermont Superior Court · 2019-04-01 · Published · cited 0×
Stinson v. Union Mutual Fire Ins. Co., 103-7-18 Oecv (Harris, J., Apr. 1, 2019) [The text of this Vermont trial court opinion is unofficial. It has been reformatted from the original. The accuracy of the text and the accompanying data included in the Vermont trial court opinion database is not guaranteed.] STATE OF VERMONT SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL DIVIS
Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2011-04-08 · Published · cited 10× · 252 P.3d 597; 45 Kan. App. 2d 618
252 P.3d 597 (2011) LOUISBURG BUILDING & DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, L.L.C., Carson Group, Inc., and Damon A. Williams, Appellees/Cross-appellants, v. Troy ALBRIGHT and Kris Albright, Appellants/Cross-appellees. No. 102,511. Court of Appeals of Kansas. April 8, 2011. *602 Mark D. Murphy and Jeffrey M. Cook, of The Murphy Law Firm, L
Court of Appeals of Washington · 2004-06-08 · Published · cited 16× · 88 P.3d 986
88 P.3d 986 (2004) STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY, an Illinois corporation, Appellant, v. ENGLISH COVE ASSOCIATION, INC., a Washington corporation; Douglass C. Reiss; W. Dean Weidner; and English Cove Condominium Association, Respondents. No. 51750-3-I. Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1. April 26, 2004. As Amended June 8, 2004.
District Court, D. Connecticut · 2017-08-28 · Published · cited 15× · 264 F. Supp. 3d 394
RULING ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Stefan R. Underhill, United States District Judge Michael and Annette Roberts sued their insurer, Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Co. (“Liberty Mutual”), after Liberty Mutual denied coverage for the deterioration of their concrete basement walls. The Rob-ertses , allege (1) that Liberty Mutual breached its insurance contract with them by denying coverage; (2) that Liber
District Court, S.D. New York · 2013-06-04 · Published · cited 14× · 949 F. Supp. 2d 447; 2013 WL 2455923; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 80249
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER P. KEVIN CASTEL, District Judge. In a 175-page, 862-paragraph complaint, plaintiff In Touch Concepts, Inc. (“Zcom”) brings this action against defendants. The complaint is neither “short” nor “plain” as required by Rule 8(a)(2), Fed.R.Civ.P. Counsel for plaintiff is cautioned to be mindful of the mandates of Rule 8(a) in any pleading filed in a federal forum. But for the proce
District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2010-05-12 · Published · cited 72× · 268 F.R.D. 226; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 46976; 2010 WL 1912245
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER L. PATRICK AULD, United States Magistrate Judge. This matter comes before the Court on a Motion to Compel (Docket Entry 56) filed by Defendant ConvaTec Inc. (“ConvaTec”). In said motion, ConvaTec asks this Court to compel Plaintiffs Kinetic Concepts, Inc., KCI Licensing, Inc., KCI USA, Inc., KCI Medical Resources, Medical Holdings Limited, KCI Manufacturing (collect
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016-08-12 · Published · cited 3× · 556 B.R. 125; 2016 Bankr. LEXIS 2977
OPINION Ashely M. Chan, United States Bankruptcy Judge TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction... 136 II. Facts and Procedural History... 136 A. The Debtor... 137 B. The Chesapeake Bank Factoring Agreement... 137 C. So Real Brands, LLC... 138 D. The Debtor’s Assets... 138
Supreme Court of Florida · 2008-01-24 · Published · cited 70× · 974 So. 2d 368; 2008 WL 190633
974 So.2d 368 (2008) CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY, etc., Petitioner, v. RYAN INCORPORATED EASTERN, etc., et al., Respondents.[1] Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company, Petitioner, v. Ryan Incorporated Eastern, etc., et al., Respondents. Nos. SC05-1935, SC05-4816. Supreme Court of Florida. January 24, 2008. *371
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011-03-08 · Published · cited 262× · 638 F.3d 1137; 97 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 2036; 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 4488; 2011 WL 815806
638 F.3d 1137 (2011) NETWORK AUTOMATION, INC., a California Corporation, Plaintiff-counter-defendant-Appellant, v. ADVANCED SYSTEMS CONCEPTS, INC., a New Jersey Corporation, Defendant-counter-claimant-Appellee. No. 10-55840. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted December 8, 2010. Filed March 8, 2011.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012-08-13 · Published · cited 120× · 688 F.3d 1342; 104 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1001; 2012 WL 3264508; 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 16904
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit __________________________ KINETIC CONCEPTS, INC., KCI LICENSING, INC., KCI USA, INC., KCI MEDICAL RESOURCES, KCI MANUFACTURING, AND MEDICAL HOLDINGS LIMITED, Plaintiffs, AND WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SMITH & NEPHEW, INC., Defendant-Appellee.
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2008-07-02 · Published · cited 31× · 989 So. 2d 164
989 So.2d 164 (2008) James CLARKSTON, Individually, and as Natural Tutor of his Minor Son, Julius Clarkston v. LOUISIANA FARM BUREAU CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Gina Evans, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, and The State of Louisiana, through the Department of Transportation and Development. Nos. 2007-CA-0158, 2007-CA-1282. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit.