Cases

Page 2 CONNECTICUT LAW JOURNAL July 28, 2020 212 JULY, 2020 335 Conn. 212 State v. Covington STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. JEFFREY COVINGTON (SC 20198) Robinson, C. J., and Palmer, McDonald, D’Auria, Mullins, Kahn an

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr

**************************************************************** The ‘‘officially released’’ date that appears near the beginning of this opinion is the date the opinion was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the ‘‘officially released’’ date appearing in the opinion. This opinion is subject to revisions and editorial changes, not of a substantive nature, and corrections of a tech

Lyall v Justin Boot Co. (2021 NY Slip Op 03100) Lyall v Justin Boot Co. 2021 NY Slip Op 03100 Decided on May 13, 2021 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Jud

596 F.Supp.2d 400 (2009) Russell CARLSON, Individually and on Behalf of all others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs, v. XEROX CORPORATION, KPMG LLP, Paul A. Allaire, G. Richard Thoman, Anne Mulcahy, Barry Romeril, Gregory Tayler, and Philip Fishbach, Defendants. Civil No. 3:00CV01621(AWT). United States District Court, D. Connecticut. January 14, 2009.

392 F.Supp.2d 267 (2005) Russell CARLSON, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs, v. XEROX CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. Florida State Board of Administration, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Xerox Corporation, et al., Defendants. No. 3:00CV1621(AWT). United States District Court, D. Connecticut. July 13, 2005.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 122,472 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. AARON DOUGLAS UNRUH, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT When an insufficien

PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 598 U. S. Part 2 Pages 617–622 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT May 18, 2023 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are requ

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued October 22, 2012 Decided June 28, 2013 No. 12-5031 ROBERT GORDON, APPELLEE v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, ET AL., APPELLANTS Consolidated with 12-5051 Appeals from the United Sta

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 21-1369 PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTH ATLANTIC, on behalf of itself, its patients, and its physicians and staff; GREENVILLE WOMEN’S CLINIC, on behalf of itself, its patients, and its physicians and staff; TERRY L. BUFFKIN, M.D., on behalf of himself and his patients, Plaintiffs - Appelle

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 21-1369 PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTH ATLANTIC, on behalf of itself, its patients, and its physicians and staff; GREENVILLE WOMEN’S CLINIC, on behalf of itself, its patients, and its physicians and staff; TERRY L. BUFFKIN, M.D., on behalf of himself and his patients, Plaintiffs - Appelle

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued October 24, 2022 Decided May 21, 2024 No. 21-5299 NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION, APPELLEE v. CAROLE JOHNSON, IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS ADMINISTRATOR, HEALTH RESOURCES AND SERVICE ADMINISTRATION AND XAVIER BECERRA, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS SECRETARY, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF

722 F.Supp.2d 977 (2010) Andrew DUFFY, George Adams, Gregg Harder, Christopher Jackman, Jason Lee, Jose Ordaz, Vincent Ruggiero, and Sohail Shah, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs v. The TICKETRESERVE, INC., d/b/a Inc., FirstDIBZ.com, an Illinois corporation, Defendants. No. 09 C 1746. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division.

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 25-1170 STATE OF NEW JERSEY; COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS; STATE OF CALIFORNIA; STATE OF COLORADO; STATE OF CONNECTICUT; STATE OF DELAWARE; DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA; STATE OF HAWAI'I; STATE OF MAINE; STATE OF MARYLAND; ATTORNEY GENERAL DANA NESSEL, on behalf of the People of Michigan; STATE OF MINNESOTA; STATE OF NEVADA; STATE OF NEW MEXICO; STATE OF NEW YORK; STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA; STATE OF

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER P. Kevin Castel, United States District Judge The Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) brings this action for violations of the Securities Act of 1933 (“Securities Act”), the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”), .and the rules promulgated .thereunder, against New York Global Group (“NYGG”), a New York-based company, and several individual defendants. The SEC’s a

AMY J. ST. EVE, United States Circuit Court Judge* This antitrust suit was born when a monopolist in one market decided not to do business with a competitor from a related market. The monopolist, Comcast Corporation, denied its competitor, Viamedia, Inc., access (or access on terms Viamedia considered reasonable) to much-needed sales platforms called interconnects. Hurting as it lost revenue and customer

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 25-1160 ANDREA BECKWITH; EAST COAST SCHOOL OF SAFETY; NANCY COSHOW; JAMES WHITE; J. WHITE GUNSMITHING; ADAM HENDSBEE; THOMAS COLE; TLC GUNSMITHING AND ARMORY; A&G SHOOTING, Plaintiffs, Appellees, v. AARON M. FREY, in their personal capacity and in their official capacity as Attorney General of Maine, D

GARRETT, J. *510Melissa and Aaron Klein, the owners of a bakery doing business as Sweetcakes by Melissa (Sweetcakes), seek judicial review of a final order of the Bureau of Labor and Industries (BOLI) finding that the Kleins' refusal to provide a wedding cake to the complainants, a same-sex couple, violated ORS 659A.403, which prohibits a pla

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT NETCHOICE, LLC, No. 25-146 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 5:24-cv-07885- EJD v. ROB BONTA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of California, OPINION Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the