Cases

259 P.3d 595 (2011) KNIPE LAND COMPANY, an Idaho corporation, Plaintiff-Cross Respondent-Appellant, v. Richard A. ROBERTSON, Johnnie L. Robertson, husband and wife, and Robertson Kennels, Inc., an Idaho corporation, Defendants-Third Party Plaintiffs-Cross-Appellants-Respondents, and John Knipe, an individual, Third Party Defendant-Cross Respondent-Appellant. No. 37002. Supreme Court of Idaho, Boise

JUSTICE McKINNON delivered the Opinion of the Court. ¶1 T.M. (Mother) appeals from orders of the Eighth Judicial District Court, Cascade County, terminating her parental rights to her three children, A.H., L.M., and J.M. We affirm. ¶2 Mother presents the following issues for review: 1. Whether Mother’s due process rights were violated hy delays in holding the

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO Docket No. 37002 KNIPE LAND COMPANY, an Idaho ) corporation, ) ) Plaintiff-Cross Respondent-Appellant, ) ) v. ) ) RICHARD A. ROBERTSON, JOHNNIE

March 10 2015 DA 14-0225 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 2015 MT 75 IN THE MATTER OF: A.H., L.M., and J.M., Youths in Need of Care. APPEAL FROM: District Court of the Eighth Judicial District, In and For the County of Cascade, Cause No

COHEN, J., concurring specially. If I were writing on a clean slate, I would affirm the trial court’s denial of GKTW’s summary judgment. I am bound, however, to follow this Court’s prior decisions that do not require an express reference to negligence in a release in order to render the release effective to such actions. This District stands alone on this position. See Levine v. A. Madley Corp., 5

In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ________________ NO. 09-23-00371-CR ________________ BRANDON MICHAEL HAMEL, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee ___________________________________________________

*1134OPINION AND ORDER THERESA L. SPRINGMANN, District Judge. The Plaintiffs, Simpson Performance Products, Inc., and SFI Foundation, sued the Defendants, Robert C. Wagoner and Derek Randall Cathcart in the Western District of North Carolina for trademark infringement, unfair competition, unfair and deceptive trade practices, patent infringement,

DECISION This matter is before the Court on Defendant Laurie Blanchard's (Blanchard) motion for a new trial pursuant to Rule 59 of the Rhode Island Superior Court Rules of Civil Procedure. Co-defendants Louis Ducharme, Patricia Ducharme, and James Ducharme (Ducharmes) object to Blanchard's motion. For the reasons set forth below, this Court denies Blanchard's motion for a new trial.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA January 2015 Term _______________ FILED June 16, 2015 released at 3:00 p.m. No. 14-0757 RORY L. PERRY II, CLERK

Arnold-Burger, J.: In February 2012, Lancelot Joshua Wilburn and a companion were stopped by two Overland Park detectives at Oak Park Mall. Suspecting criminal activity, the detectives detained the two men and confiscated their cell phones. A bizarre sequence of events unfolded from this detention, resulting in an intercepted phone call, four arrests, the search of a fraudulently rented Kia, and the discovery of a large amount o

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 123,302 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. BRANDON T. EVANS, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. Claims alleging a violation of the Sixth Amendment right to effecti

MODIFIED OPINION1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 123,302 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. BRANDON T. EVANS, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. Claims allegin

DECISION This case is before the Court for decision following a non-jury trial on a complaint by plaintiffs Louis and Juliette Lopez. In said complaint, the Plaintiffs seek to establish title to a portion of land designated as a right-of-way and to establish their rights to an easement on the land owned by defendant Laurie Blanchard. By counterclaim against Louis and Juliette Lopez, and by cross-claim against Louis Duc

Illinois Official Reports Appellate Court Tipton v. Madison County, 2015 IL App (5th) 140186 Appellate Court DENNIS TIPTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MADISON COUNTY, Caption MADISON COUNTY BOARD, and MADISON COUNTY PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, Defendants-Appellees. District & No. Fifth District

386 F.Supp.2d 965 (2005) SPARKNET COMMUNICATIONS, L.P., a Nevada limited partnership, and Sparknet Holdings, Inc., a Nevada corporation, Plaintiffs, v. BONNEVILLE INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, a Utah Corporation, Defendant. Bonneville International Corporation, a Utah Corporation, Counterclaimant, v. SparkNet Holdings, Inc., A Nevada Corporation, Counterdefendant. No. 05 C 2677. United States

McHUGH, Circuit Judge. I. INTRODUCTION In 2010, Lenox MacLaren Surgical Corporation (“Lenox”) sued several related corporations — Medtronic, Inc.; Medtronic PS Medical, Inc. (“PS Medical”); Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. (“MSD, Inc.”); and Medtronic Sofamor Danek Co. Ltd. (“MSD Japan”) (collectively, “Defendants”) — for monopolization and attempted monopo

218 P.3d 75 (2009) 2009-NMSC-048 F. Ferrell DAVIS, Plaintiff-Petitioner and Cross-Respondent, v. DEVON ENERGY CORPORATION, et al., Defendants-Respondents and Cross-Petitioners. Phillis Ideal and Collins Partners, Ltd., a Texas limited partnership, Plaintiffs-Petitioners and Cross-Respondents, v. BP America Production Company, Defendant-Respondent and Cross-Petitioner. Smith Family, L.L.C., for itself and al

MEMORANDUM OPINION ROYCE C. LAMBERTH, Chief Judge. This case is before this Court on appeal from the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Columbia. Appellant Sam J. Alberts, the trustee for the Doctors Community Hospital Corporation Liquidating Trust, appeals from the final judgment of U.S. Bankruptcy Judge S. Martin Teel. In bankruptcy court, Alberts had initiated an adversary proceeding

[Cite as State v. Fenderson, 2023-Ohio-2903.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT ERIE COUNTY State of Ohio Court of Appeals No. E-22-034 Appellee Trial Court No. 2021 CR 0317 v. Shakill Fenderson DECISION AND JUDGMENT Appellant

OPINION LEWIS A. KAPLAN, District Judge. The Bank of New York Mellon (“BNY Mellon”) acted for the Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (“SEPTA”) under a Master Trust Agreement (the “MTA”), principally as a custodian for securities of pension and other funds managed for SEPTA by other investment managers. From time to time, BNY Mellon and a predecessor provided foreign exchange (“FX”) services,