Cases

[Cite as Smith v. Norfolk S. Ry. Co., 2025-Ohio-3122.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT ERIE COUNTY Kelly Smith Court of Appeals No. E-24-049 Appellant Trial Court No. 2021 CV 0440 v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company DECISION AND JUDGMENT A

OPINION AND ORDER SARA L. ELLIS, United States District Judge Plaintiffs Josephine Wade Smith and Rupert Smith filed suit against Defendant CSX Transportation, Inc. (“CSX”), alleging that they suffered property damage and personal injury resulting from both CSX’s idling of locomotives on railroad tracks adjacent to their property and a September 2012 train derailment adjacent to their property. The Court

OPINION C. JOHNSON, J. 4 1 Appellant, Roderick L. Smith, was con-viected by a jury in Oklahoma County District Court, Case No. CF-1993-8968, of five *562counts of First Degree Murder, 21 0.8.1991, § TOl.7(A) He was originally. sentenced to death on all five counts. This Court affirmed his convictions and sentences on direct appeal. Smith v. State,

07/09/2018 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE January 16, 2018 Session ERNEST SMITH V. WELLMONT HEALTH SYSTEM ET AL. 1 Interlocutory Appeal from the Law Court for Sullivan County No. C41513 (C) E. G. Moody, Judge _________________

STREETT, J. Introduction On January 22, 2016, a Middletown High School student 1 (who also worked as a student aid) filed a complaint (the "Underlying Complaint") against the Board of Education of Appoquinimink School District (the "School Board") and Scott D. Smith ("Plain

OPINION RILEY, Judge. STATEMENT OF THE CASE Appellant-Defendant, Wayne K. Smith (Smith), appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence. We affirm. *654 ISSUE Smith raises three issues for our review, which we consolidate and res

Branch, Judge. Larry G. Smith suffered a knee injury when he slipped and fell while ascending a set of stairs at a facility owned and operated by his then-employer, CSX Transportation, Inc. (“CSX”). Smith subsequently filed suit against the railroad seeking to recover for the injuries he sustained as a result of his accident. The case went to trial, and the jury returned a verdict in favor of CSX. The trial court entered jud

Agostini, John A., J. 1. Introduction This shareholders’ derivative suit is before the Court on two motions. First, the defendants have moved to dismiss the action on the grounds that the corporation has been sold and the plaintiff, representing the interests of the corporation, has lost standing. Second, the plaintiff has filed what he captions as a Cross Motion to Determine the Requirements of G.L.c. 1

{¶ 1} The certified question is answered in the affirmative and the judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of Kaminski v. Metal & Wire Prods. Co., 125 Ohio St.3d 250, 2010-Ohio-1027, 927 N.E.2d 1066, and Stetter v. R.J. Corman Derailment Servs., L.L.C., 125 Ohio St.3d 280, 2010-Ohio-1029, 927 N.E.2d 1092. {¶ 2} Appellant’s motion for full briefing and argument or, in the alternative, for re

17 A.3d 873 (2011) COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee v. James Melvin SMITH, Appellant. No. 591 CAP. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Submitted July 1, 2010. Decided March 29, 2011. *879 Cristi A. Charpentier, Billy Horatio Nolas, Defender Association of Philadelphia, *880 M

983 So.2d 285 (2008) Lanikia SMITH, by her Next Friend, Bettie SMITH; Camille Carter, by her Next Friend, Lareatha Carter; Amory School District and Amory School District Board of Trustees v. Charles CLEMENT d/b/a M & W Butane Gas Company, Inc. No. 2006-CA-00018-SCT. Supreme Court of Mississippi. April 3, 2008. Rehearing Denied June 19, 2008.

BARNES, Presiding Judge. This appeal arises out of a fatal collision between a freight train and a pickup truck at a railroad crossing. Before the collision between the train and pickup truck, the truck was involved in a motor vehicle accident with another car and had come to rest on the railroad tracks as a result. Apassenger in the truck subsequently was killed when the train ow

[Cite as Smith v. Inland Paperboard & Packaging, Inc., 126 Ohio St.3d 64, 2010-Ohio-3133.] SMITH, APPELLANT, ET AL., v. INLAND PAPERBOARD & PACKAGING, INC., ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as Smith v. Inland Paperboard & Packaging, Inc., 126 Ohio St.3d 64, 2010-Ohio-3133.] Certified question answered in the affirmative and judgment of the court of appeals affirmed on the authority of Kaminski v. Metal & Wire Prods.

NO. 04-15-00362-CV JAVAN SMITH, § IN THE COURT OF APPEALS Appellant § —versus— §§ FOR _ THE FOURTH10^CKI& _ ___ i iS DC CIVIL CONSTRUCTION, LLC, § ri Appellee. § SAN ANTONI

[Cite as Smith v. Esser & Sons, Inc., 2013-Ohio-1095.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF LORAIN ) RYAN SMITH, et al. C.A. No. 12CA010150 Appellants v. APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT

HAMILTON, Circuit Judge. In most employment discrimination cases that arise in the private sector, the defendants are the employers themselves, most often corporations or other business organizations. In this case of alleged race discrimination and retaliation, however, the employer has gone through bankruptcy and so cannot be sued for relief. The plaintiff in this case has sought

[Cite as Stetter v. R.J. Corman Derailment Servs., L.L.C., 125 Ohio St.3d 280, 2010-Ohio- 1029.] STETTER ET AL. v. R.J. CORMAN DERAILMENT SERVICES, L.L.C., ET AL. [Cite as Stetter v. R.J. Corman Derailment Servs., L.L.C., 125 Ohio St.3d 280, 2010-Ohio-1029.] Torts — Employer intentional torts — R.C. 2745.01 — R.C. 2745.01 does not violate rights to trial by jury, to a remedy, to open courts, to due course of law, or to equal protection un

332 F.Supp.2d 277 (2004) UNITED STATES of America, v. Quinton SMITH, Defendant. Crim. No. 02-10421-NG. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. July 19, 2004. *278 *279 Thomas E. Kanwit, United States Attorney's Office, Boston, MA, for U.S. J. Martin Richey, Federal Defender's Of

[Cite as Smith v. Ray Esser & Sons, Inc., 2011-Ohio-1529.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF LORAIN ) RYAN SMITH C.A. No. 10CA009798 Appellant v. APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT

2008 MT 263N LARRY KIM SMITH, Petitioner and Appellee, v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, LEWIS & CLARK COUNTY, Respondent and Appellee. RON & VIVIAN DRAKE, WILLIAM & BEVERLY HERMAN, and MELVIN & SANDRA BEATTIE, Intervenors and Appellants. No. DA 07-0409 Supreme Court of Montana. Submitted on Briefs: May 14, 2008 Decided: July 29, 2008