Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

2 opinions for “Depinto v. The Sherwin-Williams Co.”

DePinto v. SHERWIN-WILLIAMS CO.public domain

District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2011-03-09 · Published · cited 4× · 776 F. Supp. 2d 796; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23864; 2011 WL 856598

776 F.Supp.2d 796 (2011) Vincent R. DePINTO and DePinto Drywall & Painting, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. The SHERWIN-WILLIAMS CO. and Pulte Holmes, Inc., Defendants. No. 07 CV 2384. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. March 9, 2011. *799 David F. Wentzel, Wentzel Law Offices, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiffs.

read the full opinion · at the source · see the docket → · company profile: SHERWIN-WILLIAMS CO. → · find the judge →

Tamburo v. Dworkinpublic domain

District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013-09-26 · Published · cited 8× · 974 F. Supp. 2d 1199; 2013 WL 5408540; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 138252

MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER JOAN B. GOTTSCHALL, District Judge. The essential facts in this 2004 case are undisputed. Defendant Kristen Henry, a dog breeder and computer programmer, spent almost five years creating an extensive database of dog pedigrees, which she made freely available for use by fellow breeders through her web site. Plaintiffs John Tamburo and Versity Corporation (‘Versity”

read the full opinion · at the source · see the docket → · find the judge →