Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Deonte E Jones”
United States v. Deonte Womackpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 24-2581 ___________________________ United States of America Plaintiff - Appellee v. Deonte Womack Defenda
State of Missouri v. Deonte M. Robinsonpublic domain
In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION FOUR STATE OF MISSOURI, ) No. ED112322 ) Respondent, ) Appeal from the Circuit Court of ) St. Louis County vs.
Tramarus Deonte Dixon v. State of Iowapublic domain
MCDONALD, Judge. Tramarus Dixon was charged with two counts of robbery in the first degree. He was convicted on one count and was acquitted of the other. On direct appeal, this court affirmed his conviction. See State v. Dixon , No. 12-1873, 2013 WL 640578
State of Tennessee v. Deonte McBeepublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs November 12, 2008 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. DEONTE McBEE Appeal from the Criminal Court for Shelby County No. 03-04435 W. Fred Axley, Judge No. W2007-01719-CCA-R3-CD - Filed August 24, 2009 The Defendant, Deonte McBee, appeals from his convictions
United States v. Naeem Jonespublic domain
USCA4 Appeal: 24-4624 Doc: 53 Filed: 04/14/2026 Pg: 1 of 13 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 24-4624 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. NAEEM DEONTE JONES, Defendant - Ap
Deonte Smarr v. Statepublic domain
FIRST DIVISION ELLINGTON, C. J., PHIPPS, P. J., and DILLARD, J. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. (Court of Appeals Rule 4 (b) and Rule 37 (b), February 21, 2008) http:
In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana ______________________________ No. 06-02 -000
Bulls v. Jonespublic domain
86 F.Supp.2d 746 (2000) Jabbar Priest BULLS, Petitioner, v. Kurt JONES, Respondent. No. 99-CV-73698-DT. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. February 22, 2000. *747 Krut C. Kobelt, Madison, WI. Wayne Rudell, Dearborn, MI. Timothy K. Darroll, Detroit, MI. OPINION AND ORDE
Edison v. Statepublic domain
PAUL E. DANIELSON, Associate Justice | Appellant Deonte Edison appeals the sentencing order. entered, by the Pulaski County Circuit Court, reflecting his convictions and sentences for capital murder, attempted capital murder, and two counts of aggravated robbery. Each count was enhanced for employing a firearm, and Edison was sentenced to a total term of
Spicer v. District of Columbiapublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION BARBARA J. ROTHSTEIN, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on defendant William Thomas’ motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and on the remaining defendants’ motion for partial judgment on the pleadings under Rule 12(c). The Court denies the former and grants the latter.
Quadir Quiroz v. State of Indianapublic domain
FILED Jul 23 2025, 9:35 am CLERK Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeals and
State v. Carterpublic domain
[Cite as State v. Carter, 2024-Ohio-2166.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 113021 v. : DEONTE LASHAWN CARTER, :
Commonwealth v. Thompsonpublic domain
By Judge Clifford R. Weckstein According to the testimony at a suppression hearing, a married couple was robbed at gunpoint, late at night, in the parking lot of a Roanoke motel. As the robbers were fleeing, but still in sight, one of the complaining witnesses used her cell phone to report the crime and describe the perpetrators. Within a short time, Roanoke City Police officers, using descriptions furnished by the complaini
Robinson v. Statepublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE DEONTE L. ROBINSON, § § No. 128, 2024 Defendant Below, § Appellant, § Court Below—Superior Court § of the State of Delaware v. § § Cr. ID Nos. 2103002599, STATE OF DELAWARE, § 2008012080
State of Tennessee v. Chanceller Chatmanpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs April 14, 2009 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. CHANCELLER CHATMAN Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for Shelby County No. 03-04435 W. Fred Axley, Judge No. W2008-00568-CCA-R3-CD - Filed June 26, 2009 The defendant, Chanceller Chatman, was convicted by a Shelby County Criminal C
Estates of McKnight v. Bank of America, N.A.public domain
277 S.W.3d 173 (2008) In re ESTATES OF Jerome McKNIGHT; Deonte McKnight; Angela Marshall; Stephanie McKnight and Natasha Marshall, Appellants, v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Appellee. No. 07-371. Supreme Court of Arkansas. February 21, 2008. *175 Gary Eubanks & Associates, by: Russell Marlin, Little Rock, for appellants. Wr
State v. Ladarius Vickerspublic domain
SECOND DIVISION BARNES, P. J., BOGGS and RICKMAN, JJ. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. http://www.gaappeals.us/rules November 1,
People v. Solepublic domain
JUSTICE QUINN delivered the opinion of the court: Following a bench trial, defendant Marco Sole was found guilty of aggravated unlawful use of a weapon and was sentenced to 14 years in prison. On appeal, defendant contends that the aggravated unlawful use of a weapon statute (the aggravated UUW statute) (720 ILCS 5/24 —
State v. Carneypublic domain
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE STATE OF DELAWARE ) ) v. ) ID Nos. 1910011637, 1910002022 ) 2009010583, VOP16110110891 DEONTA CARNEY, ) ) Defendant. ) Date Submitted: August 1, 2022 Date Decided: November 18, 2022 Upon Defendant Deonta Ca
State v. Sewellpublic domain
WELBAUM, P.J. {¶ 1} This case is before us on the appeal of Defendant-Appellant, Kenneth Sewell, from his conviction and sentence for robbery, following a bench trial. In support of his appeal, Sewell contends that the court erred in denying his motion for acquittal under Crim.R. 29(A), and that his conviction was against the manifest weight of the evidence. Sewell further contends that