Cases

Opinion by Justice KELLER concurring in part and dissenting in part. I simply cannot decide what I find most troubling about Part IV (Witness Deposition) of the majority opinion. I have, however, prepared a “short list.” First, despite the fact that the Commonwealth has never — either in the trial court or in its brief to this Court — uttered or written the word

298 F.3d 375 Brandon HAYNES, Petitioner-Appellee,v.Burl CAIN, Warden Louisiana State Penitentiary, Respondent-Appellant. No. 00-31012. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. July 12, 2002. Henry Clay Walker, IV (argued), Walker, Tooke & Lyons, Shreveport, LA, for Petitioner-Appellee.

490 A.2d 104 (1983) William Henry FLAMER, Defendant Below, Appellant, v. STATE of Delaware, Plaintiff Below, Appellee. Supreme Court of Delaware. Submitted: June 24, 1982. Re-submitted Following Supplemental Briefing: December 6, 1982. Decided: February 7, 1983. Opinion on Death Sentence Submitted Following Supplemental Briefing and Argument: M

446 F.Supp. 252 (1977) UNITED STATES of America v. Filipina NARCISO and Leonora Perez. Crim. Nos. 6-80884, 7-80149. United States District Court, E. D. Michigan, S. D. Memorandum Opinion and Order Regarding Discovery December 26, 1976. Memorandum Opinion and Order Denying Motion to Strike January 27, 1977. Memorandum Opinion and Order Denying M

Cox, C. J. The General Assembly at its regular biennial session held in 1911, drafted and incorporated in' a bill, what was therein termed a proposed new Constitution, which was a copy of the existing Constitution, with twenty-three amendments, or changes, o'f its provisions, and it provided, that it should, if adopted, take effect on January 1, 1913. There was no pretense of complying with or proceeding under provisions of the