Cases

BRANDON J. HARRISON, Judge This appeal concerns the transfer of more than $ 1.2 million in stock and the securities law of Arkansas. The main procedural issue is whether the circuit court correctly granted summary judgment in favor of First National Bank of Eastern Arkansas on a complaint that William Ash filed against the bank. The complaint raised breach-of-fiduciary-duty, conversion, and replevin claims against First National Ban

WELLFORD, Senior Circuit Judge. The plaintiff, Abbie Perry (Perry), is a salaried black employee of defendant, General Motors Corporation (GM). In August, 1991, Perry and her husband, Lonnie, filed a complaint in Michigan state -court alleging that, based on her ' race, GM had denied Perry promotions and merit pay . and had demoted plaintiff by transferring her to a department w

RIPPLE, Circuit Judge. John Tebbens brought this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, 1 alleging that Chicago Police Officer Dennis Mushol arrested him without probable cause in violation of his Fourth Amendment rights. He sought indemnification against

PD-0290-15 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS Transmitted 8/10/2015 12:00:00 AM Accepted 8/10/2015 8:34:39 AM August 10, 2015

521 S.E.2d 604 (1999) 239 Ga. App. 565 In the Interest of A.S.H. et al., children. No. A99A1054. Court of Appeals of Georgia. August 10, 1999. *605 Sean A. Black, Toccoa, for appellant. Thurbert E. Baker, Attorney General, Dennis R. Dunn, Deputy Attorney General, William C. Joy, Senior Assistant Attorney Ge

94 Ill. App.3d 1011 (1981) 419 N.E.2d 503 GEORGE A. KALKOUNOS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FOUR K'S, INC., et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 79-2342. Illinois Appellate Court — First District (1st Division). Opinion filed March 30, 1981. Walter, Zelden, Birndorf & Goldberg, of Chicago (Alfred M. Walter and Jerome J. Zelden, of counsel), for a

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JANE J. BOYLE, District Judge. Before the Court is a Motion for Summary Judgment (doc. 35) filed by Defendants The Bank of New York Mellon f/k/a The Bank of New York, as Successor Trustee to JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Trustee for the Holders of the SAMI II Trust 2004-AR7, Mortgage Pass Through Certificates Series 2004-AR7 (“Bank of New York”), and Bank of America, N.A

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Submitted on Briefs September 26, 2013 IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF DENNIS R. WOOLVERTON Appeal from the Chancery Court of Weakley County No. 21822 W. Michael Maloan, Chancellor No. W2013-00517-COA-R3-CV - Filed January 30, 2014 This is a will contest. The alleged will was signed by three witnesses. At the hearing on th

GRUENDER, Circuit Judge. Dennis F. Smith (“Smith”) brought this two-count medical malpractice action regarding the amputation of his right leg. The district court 1 granted partial summary judgment and partial judgment as a matter of law in favor of the defendants on count one. A jury returned a verdict in favor of the de

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2021-CA-00714-COA KENNETH MORELAND APPELLANT v. BRANDY SPEARS F/K/A BRANDY APPELLEE GREENWOOD MORELAND DATE OF JUDGMENT: 07/24/2020 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. GEORGE WARD COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: ADAMS COUNTY CHANCERY C

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2013-DR-01796-SCT LESLIE GALLOWAY, III a/k/a LESLIE GALLOWAY a/k/a LESLIE “BO” GALLOWAY, III v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI DATE OF JUDGMENT: 09/24/2010 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. ROGER T. CLARK COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: HARRISON COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ATTORNEYS FOR PETITIONER: OFFICE OF CAPITAL POST-CONVICTION

OPINION ROSEMARY GAMBARDELLA, BANKRUPTCY JUDGE MATTER BEFORE THE COURT Before the Court is a Motion to Enforce a Plan Injunction filed by G-I Holdings, Inc. (“G-I”)1 and GAF Corporation (“GAF”) (collectively “G-I” or “Debtors”). G-I is seeking an order to enforce the Confirmed Plan’s discharge injunction against Ashland, LLC (“Ashland”), International Speci

Thomas B. Russell, Senior Judge This matter is before the Court on Defendant Marshall County Board of Education's motion for summary judgment, [DN 21.] Plaintiff K.C., by and through his parents T.C. and K.C., responded to Defendant's motion, [DN 22], and Defendant replied, [DN 25.] Fully briefed, this matter is now ripe for consideration. For the reasons discussed below, Defendant's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED

By Judge Henry A. Vanover The above-styled case is now before the Court following the bench trial on June 25 and 26, 2014. At the close of evidence, the parties requested leave to file their closing arguments as written briefs. After thorough review of the court file, the evidence presented at trial, and the written arguments of counsel, the Court now makes the following ruling. I. Background

2017 WI 110 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2012AP2377 & 2015AP870 COMPLETE TITLE: Debra K. Sands, Plaintiff-Appellant-Petitioner, v. John R. Menard, Jr., Menard Thoroughbreds, Inc., Webster Hart as Trustee of the John R. Menard, Jr. 2002 Trust and Related Trusts, Angela L.

652 F.Supp. 148 (1986) Estella K. ASH, Plaintiff, v. SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, a Washington corporation, Defendant. No. CV 85-5799 CBM. United States District Court, C.D. California. October 21, 1986. Order Denying Motion December 5, 1986. *149 MEMORANDUM ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR

HANSEN, Circuit Judge. These consolidated appeals arise out of a contribution action brought pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), 42 U.S.C. § § 9601-9675. The final judgment requires Donald E. Horne, Victor Horne, K.C.1986 Limited Partnership (K.C.1986) (collectively the Horne Appellants), and DeAngelo Brothers, Inc. (De

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ EXELA PHARMA SCIENCES, LLC, EXELA PHARMSCI, INC., EXELA HOLDINGS, INC., Plaintiffs-Appellants v. MICHELLE K. LEE, Deputy Director, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Defendant-Appellee CADENCE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., SCR PHARMATOP, Intervenors ____________

Peterson, Judge. The mother of four young children, A. S., T. S., I. S., and T. R, appeals from the termination of her parental rights. 1 She argues that termination of her rights was against the weight of the evidence and that the juvenile court erred by allowing a supervisor from the Division of Family and Children Serv

327 B.R. 262 (2005) In re MIRANT CORPORATION, et al., Debtors. Mirant Mid-Atlantic, LLC, Mirant Corporation, Mirant MD Ash Management, LLC, Mirant Peaker LLC, Mirant Potomac River LLC, and Mirant Chalk Point LLC, Plaintiffs v. Morgantown OL1 LLC; Morgantown OL2 LLC; Morgantown OL3 LLC; Morgantown OL4 LLC; Morgantown OL5 LLC; Morgantown OL6 LLC; Morgantown OL7 LLC; Dickerson OL1 LLC; Dickerson OL2 LLC; Dickerson OL3 LLC; Dickerson OL4 LLC; Sem