Cases

FILED Feb 12 2024, 9:16 am CLERK Indiana Supreme Court

692 S.E.2d 47 (2010) DENNIS v. DENNIS. No. A10A0500. Court of Appeals of Georgia. March 10, 2010. *48 George M. Hubbard III, Savannah, Elizabeth A. Moser, for Appellant. Ellis, Painter, Ratterree & Adams, Tracy A. O'Connell, for Appellee. ANDREWS, Presiding Judge. Billy Joe Dennis takes this appeal from t

ORDER GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Chen-Li Sung, M.D. (“Plaintiff’ or “Sung”), an active duty officer and doctor in the United States Army, was terminated from the Tripler Army Medical Center (“TAMC”) general surgery residency training p

NELSON, Circuit Judge: We must decide whether it was error for the district court to uphold the government’s withholding of documents requested under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. § 552, on the basis of an in camera affidavit submitted in support of the claimed exemptions without a review of the requested documents. We affirm.

675 F.3d 187 (2012) SECRETARY OF LABOR, Appellant v. James DOYLE; Cynthia Holloway; Michael Garnett; Mark MacCariella; PITWU Health and Welfare; Tim Foster; Freedman & Lorry; Dante Georeno; Neil S. Goldstein, Esq.; Franklin Militello; The Mckeough Company; Union Privilege Care, Inc.; David Weinstein. No. 10-3598. United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. Argued April 2

DENNIS, Circuit Judge, concurring in part in the judgment: I respectfully concur in the majority opinion’s decision that the CVRA does not grant crime victims a right to a direct appeal from a district court’s rejection of her claim for restitution under 18 U.S.C. § 2259; that the CVRA grants crime victims only a right to seek traditional mandamus review; and that the CVRA grants the government the right t

* Pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 8.1110, this opinion is certified for publication with the exception of parts I, II, IV, V, VI, and VII of the Discussion. OPINION In the published portion of this opinion involving a jury trial on medical battery, we hold that the two form instructions on medical battery found in CACI Nos. 530A and 530B correctly state the intent requirement for

PER CURIAM. Benjamin L. Doyle seeks to appeal the district court’s orders: (1) dismissing his claims against the Department of Corrections and Craven Correctional Institution as frivolous; and (2) denying his motion for appointment of counsel. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b);

DOYLE, Chief Judge. Dennis and Lisa Moore filed this action to recover for injuries Dennis received in a fall from the top level of a car hauler manufactured by Cottrell, Inc. The Moores appeal the trial court’s orders striking their experts and granting summary judgment to Cottrell. We affirm for the reasons that follow. On April 1, 2008, Dennis, a car hauler driver for Waggoners Trucking Company, went to t

629 N.E.2d 189 (1994) 257 Ill. App.3d 983 195 Ill.Dec. 881 Dillard R. MISSELHORN and Agnes I. Misselhorn, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Dennis DOYLE, States Attorney for Monroe County, Walter Riebeling, John Coates, Mayor of the City of Columbia, Alan Holden, Francis Fromme, Bernhardt Bergman, Sandra Roessler, Clyde Davis, David Janson, Janet Janson, Jerome Buss, Alma Buss, Art Baltz, Arlou Baltz, Ellen

—In a matrimonial action in which the parties were divorced by a judgment dated April 12, 1985, the defendant former husband appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Levitt, J.), dated April 16, 1991, which, after a hearing, inter alia, found him in contempt of court and granted the plaintiff former wife a judgment for child support arrears in the amount of $17,040. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with c

444 F.Supp.2d 1149 (2006) Keith LANCE, Carl Miller, Renee Nelson, Nancy O'Connor, Plaintiffs, v. Gigi DENNIS, Secretary of State for the State of Colorado, in her Official Capacity only, Defendant. Civil Action No. 03-cv-02453-ZLW-CBS. United States District Court, D. Colorado. August 11, 2006. *1150

JOHN WALTER PHILLIPS, ) ) Plaintiff-Appellant/Respondent, ) ) v. ) Nos. SD33173 and SD33259 ) (consolidated) MISSOURI TLC, LLC, DOYLE FROST, ) and DENNIS FROST, ) Filed: June 30, 2015 )

JACOBS, Circuit Judge: This appeal arises out of a controversy over the governance of the Seneca Nation of Indians (“Seneca Nation” or “the Nation”), a federally-recognized Indian tribe with its own constitution. A suit over the membership of the Nation’s Tribal Council was commenced before the Nation’s Peace*527makers Court. A suit arising out of the same governance

GRIFFIN, J. Appellant, Doyle Group, d/b/a Chiropractic Economics [“Doyle”], seeks review of an order denying a temporary injunction to enforce a non-compete agreement. Although we agree that the more logical interpretation of the non-compete agreement is Doyle’s, it was within the purview of the lower court to determine that the language is not without doubt and that a *77

230 F.3d 525 (2nd Cir. 2000) DENNIS J. BOWEN, SR., Individually and as President of the Seneca Nation of Indians, Plaintiff Appellee,v.VINCENT E. DOYLE, JR., Justice, New York State Supreme Court, County of Erie, PENNY WOLFGANG, Justice, New York State Supreme Court, County of Erie, Defendants Appellants,TYRONE LEROY, ROSEMARY PATTERSON, Intervenors Plaintiffs,ROSS L. JOHN, SR., CHARLES L. BALLAGH, LINDA DOXTATOR, ROBERT KENJOCKETY,

Fletcher, Presiding Justice, dissenting. Because it is unreasonable under the risk-utility analysis to deem a manufacturer negligent for choosing of one of three safety restraint options authorized under Federal Motor Vehicle Safety *578Standard 208,1 dissent. In Banks v. ICI Americas19 this Court

255 Wis.2d 359 (2002) 2002 WI 104 647 N.W.2d 851 IN RE the COMMITMENT OF DENNIS H., STATE of Wisconsin, Petitioner-Respondent, v. DENNIS H., Respondent-Appellant. No. 01-0374. Supreme Court of Wisconsin. Oral argument May 1, 2002. Decided July 12, 2002. *366 For

880 F.Supp. 99 (1995) Dennis J. BOWEN, Sr., Individually and as President of the Seneca Nation of Indians, Plaintiff, v. Vincent E. DOYLE, Jr., Penny M. Wolfgang, Justices, New York State Supreme Court, Defendants, Ross L. John, Sr., Charles L. Ballagh, Linda Doxtator, Robert Kenjockety, Jr., Richard Jimerson, Arthur W. John, Rickey Armstrong, Sr., Karen Bucktooth, Pauline Redeye, Marsha Thompson Barnes, Geraldine Memmo and Maxine Jimerson, D

JUSTICE MURRAY delivered the opinion of the court: Defendant, Patrick Doyle (Doyle), was charged by indictment with aggravated arson, arson, conspiracy to commit aggravated arson and conspiracy to commit arson. After a bench trial, defendant was found guilty on all four counts. The court entered judgment against defendant only on the aggravated arson and arson counts. Defenda