Cases

MEMORANDUM & ORDER GORTON, District Judge. I. Background A. The Parties On June 18, 2010, Philips Electronics North America Corporation, a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in Massachusetts, and its parent company Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V., a Dutch corporation with its principal place of business in the Netherlands, (col

654 F.Supp.2d 119 (2009) CORNELL UNIVERSITY, a nonprofit New York corporation, and Cornell Research Foundation, Inc., a nonprofit New York corporation, Plaintiffs, v. HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, Defendant. Hewlett-Packard Company, a Delaware corporation, Counterclaimant, v. Cornell University, a nonprofit New York corporation, and Cornell Research Foundation, Inc., a nonprofit New York corporation, Counterdefendan

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA PLANNED PARENTHOOD ARIZONA, INC., SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO PLANNED PARENTHOOD CENTER OF TUCSON, INC.; LAURA CONOVER, PIMA COUNTY ATTORNEY, Appellants, v. KRISTIN K. MAYES, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA, Appellee, and ERIC HAZELRIGG, M.D., AS GUARDIAN AD LI

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1582 JIHAD ADBUL-MUMIT; MATTHEW ABEDI; MONICA ADAIR SARGENT; MARK AGEE; ALIZ AGOSTON; YVONNE ALSTON; DAN AMATRUDA; KRISTY AMBROSE; KIMBERLEY AMICK; WANDA G. AMOS; CHRISTOPHER ARAUZA; CARL ARSENAULT; BROOKE ASHER; MICHELLE ATKINS; RAYMOND O. ATKINS; MATTHEW ATWELL; DAVID AUB; SOHA AYYASH; ASIF AZIZ; SUSAN BAILEY; KAREN BAKER; HAB BA

WINDOM, Presiding Judge. Calvin L. Stallworth, currently an inmate on Alabama’s death row at Holman Correctional Facility, appeals the circuit court’s denial of his petition for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Rule 32, Ala. R.Crim. P. In October 1998, Stallworth was convicted of two counts of capital murder for murdering Nancy Dukes and Linda Morton during the course of a robbery. The jury, by a v

No. 11-1111 vacated and remanded, and No. 11-1185 affirmed, by published opinion. Judge KING wrote the majority opinion, in which Chief Judge TRAXLER and Judges MOTZ, DUNCAN, KEENAN, WYNN, FLOYD, and THACKER joined. Judge WILKINSON wrote a dissenting *271opinion. Judge NIEMEYER wrote a dissenting opinion, in which Judges WILKINSON, SHEDD, and AGEE joined. KING, Circuit Judge

Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed November 4, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court

CONSENT JUDGMENT GADOLA, District Judge. This matter having come before the Court upon the stipulation of the parties to the entry of a Consent Judgment finally and fully resolving all of the remaining claims in this action; and It appearing to the Court that this action, initially commenced some twenty-two years ago, involves claims of discrimination based upon gender in hi

Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed December 21, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court Harr

BRISCOE, Chief Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This case arises from the Boeing Company’s (“Boeing”) 2005 sale, to Spirit AeroSystems, Inc. (“Spirit”), 1 of facilities in Wichita, Kansas, and Tulsa and McAIester, Oklahoma (the “Wichita Division” or “Division”). On June 16, 2005, Boeing terminated the Div

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. JUAN VILLA RAMIREZ, Defendant and Appellant. S099844 Kern County Superior Court SC076259A August 25, 2022 Justice Corrigan authored the opinion of the Court, in which Chief Justice Cantil-Sakauye a

215 F.Supp.2d 795 (2002) In re NORPLANT CONTRACEPTIVE PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION. MDL No. 1038. United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Beaumont Division. August 14, 2002. *796 *797 Christopher Matthew Parks, Parker & Parks, Port Arthur, TX, for Plaintiffs. F. Lane Heard III, Williams

THACKER, Circuit Judge: This appeal arises from the dismissal of three consumer actions based on Virginia state law claims. The actions focus on a series of misrepresentations made by Hyundai Motor America ("Hyundai") regarding the Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA") estimated fuel economy for the 2011, 2012, and 2013 models of the Hyundai Elantra. A Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation ("JPML") consolidated dozens of si