⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

11 opinions for “Denise Henson-Thornton”

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas) · 2013-05-31 · Published · cited 17× · 402 S.W.3d 391; 2013 WL 2370545; 2013 Tex. App. LEXIS 6747
OPINION Opinion by Justice MURPHY. In this interlocutory appeal, appellants challenge the trial court’s orders denying their motions to dismiss appellees’ health care liability claims for failure to file an expert report complying with the requirements of chapter 74 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code. See Tex. Civ. Prac. &a;
in Re Nettie Bivenspublic domain
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District · 2020-12-29 · Published · cited 0×
NUMBER 13-20-00563-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG IN RE NETTIE BIVENS, ET AL. On Petition for Writ of Injunction. MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Benavides, Longoria, and Tijerina Memorandum Opinion
District Court, D. New Jersey · 1980-04-28 · Published · cited 3× · 487 F. Supp. 1291
487 F.Supp. 1291 (1980) Robert L. DOHERTY, Plaintiff, v. RUTGERS SCHOOL OF LAW-NEWARK et al., Defendants, and Asian American Law Students Association, Tom Lee Ching Chiu, and Asian American Legal Defense and Education Fund, Inc., Defendants-Intervenors, and Association of Black Law Students, Arlene Munn and Albert Foster, Defendants-Intervenors, and Association of Latin American Law Students of Rutgers Law School-Newark an
Cooper v. Statepublic domain
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1979-02-08 · Published · cited 3× · 397 A.2d 245; 41 Md. App. 392; 1979 Md. App. LEXIS 251
41 Md. App. 392 (1979) 397 A.2d 245 CLARENCE COOPER A.K.A. RONNIE PURCELL A.K.A. RONNIE COOPER v. STATE OF MARYLAND. No. 233, September Term, 1978. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. Decided February 8, 1979. The cause was argued before GILBERT, C.J., and MOYLAN and LOWE, JJ. Howard Margulies, Assigned Public Defender, for ap
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981-06-16 · Published · cited 8× · 651 F.2d 893; 60 A.L.R. Fed. 598; 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 12263
651 F.2d 893 60 A.L.R.Fed. 598 Robert L. DOHERTY, Appellant,v.RUTGERS SCHOOL OF LAW-NEWARK; State of New Jersey; PeterSimmons, Dean; Stevens L. Lefelt, Director of Admissions;Oliver B. Quinn, Assistant Dean For Minority StudentProgram; and the Faculty-Student Committee of Admissions; Appellees,andAsian American Law Students Association, Tom Lee Ching Chiu,and Asian American Legal Defense
District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1996-02-21 · Published · cited 19× · 917 F. Supp. 1389; 3 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 1036; 6 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 35; 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3466; 1996 WL 96928
917 F.Supp. 1389 (1996) Roger MULLER, Plaintiff, v. The HOTSY CORPORATION, Defendant. No. C 94-3040. United States District Court, N.D. Iowa, Central Division. February 21, 1996. *1390 *1391 *1392 *1393
District Court, E.D. Texas · 2002-08-14 · Published · cited 27× · 215 F. Supp. 2d 795; 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16929; 2002 WL 1869869
215 F.Supp.2d 795 (2002) In re NORPLANT CONTRACEPTIVE PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION. MDL No. 1038. United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Beaumont Division. August 14, 2002. *796 *797 Christopher Matthew Parks, Parker & Parks, Port Arthur, TX, for Plaintiffs. F. Lane Heard III, Williams
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin) · 2015-10-16 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 03-15-00416-CV 7412400 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
District Court, District of Columbia · 2006-08-17 · Published · cited 66× · 449 F. Supp. 2d 1; 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 57759; 2006 WL 2380622
449 F.Supp.2d 1 (2006) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, and Tobacco-Free Kids Action Fund, American Cancer Society, American Heart Association, American Lung Association, Americans for Nonsmokers' Rights, and National African American Tobacco Prevention Network, Intervenors, v. PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC., (f/k/a Philip Morris, Inc.), et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A. 99-2496(GK). United States Distri