⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Denise C Hall”

United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 2011-02-18 · Published · cited 2× · 454 B.R. 230; 2011 WL 2938233
454 B.R. 230 (2011) In re Kimberly Denise HALL, Debtor. Liberty Community Management, Inc. Movant, v. Kimberly Denise Hall, Respondent. No. 07-67762-CRM. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division. February 18, 2011. *231 Ralph Goldberg, Goldberg & Cuvillier, P.C., Decatur, GA, for Debtor.
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2019-10-04 · Published · cited 0×
10/04/2019 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE August 6, 2019 Session LATONYA DENISE HALL V. SAMMIE LEE WILLIAMS, III Appeal from the Circuit Court for Montgomery County No. CC-2016-CV-398 Ted A. Crozier, Judge No. M2018-1738-COA-R3-CV This po
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015-01-28 · Published · cited 3× · 124 A.D.3d 852; 2 N.Y.S.3d 541
In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for discrimination in employment on the basis of sex in violation of Executive Law § 296 (1) (a) and the Administrative Code of the City of New York § 8-107, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (McMahon, J.), dated July 25, 2012, which granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2012-10-10 · Published · cited 0× · 252 Or. App. 649; 288 P.3d 574; 2012 Ore. App. LEXIS 1322
SCHUMAN, P. J. The jury in this inverse condemnation case found that plaintiffs’ property had a fair market value of $4,000,000 before defendant’s disputed activities and that these activities — repeated statements to the general public and potential purchasers that defendant intended to eliminate an 1-5 interchange, thereby rendering plaintiffs’ property landlocked, and then acquire it by condemnation— amounted to a substanti
Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont) · 2007-07-26 · Published · cited 0×
In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ______________________
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio) · 2023-01-18 · Published · cited 0×
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-22-00647-CV IN RE Denise Marie RAMOS Original Mandamus Proceeding 1 Opinion by: Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice Sitting: Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Beth Watkins, Justice
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995-12-21 · Published · cited 3× · 164 F.R.D. 172; 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18905; 1995 WL 756607
MEMORANDUM JOYNER, District Judge. Defendants Loss Prevention Consultants, Inc., John Ciaccio and Philip A. Olshevski move this Court to reconsider our December 4,1995 Order compelling certain discovery of them pursuant to a Motion filed by Thomas and Denise Hall, Plaintiffs. Movants did not respond to Plaintiffs’ Motion and we therefore treated it as uncontested pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(c) and granted
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1996-01-29 · Published · cited 0× · 164 F.R.D. 406; 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 871; 1996 WL 37760
MEMORANDUM JOYNER, District Judge. Plaintiffs, Thomas and Denise Hall, seek discovery of Defendant Harleysville Insurance Company. This action concerns Har-leysville’s alleged use of consumer credit reports during their investigation of Thomas Hall’s worker’s compensation claim. Part of Plaintiffs’ claim is that Harleysville knowingly misused the consumer credit reports. The proposed discovery goes to Har
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020-09-15 · Published · cited 8× · 975 F.3d 469
Case: 19-30766 Document: 00515564622 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/15/2020 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 19-30766 September 15, 2020
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1996-10-24 · Published · cited 5× · 943 F. Supp. 536; 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15893
943 F.Supp. 536 (1996) Thomas HALL and Denise Hall, Plaintiffs, v. HARLEYSVILLE INSURANCE CO., et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 94-CV-6656. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. October 24, 1996. *537 *538 *539 Cary L. Flitter, Lundy, Flitter
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2021-11-30 · Published · cited 13× · 19 F.4th 395
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-5 JOHN EDWARD BURR, Petitioner - Appellant, v. DENISE JACKSON, Warden, Central Prison, Raleigh, North Carolina, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro.
Kentucky Supreme Court · 2024-06-13 · Published · cited 0×
RENDERED: JUNE 13, 2024 TO BE PUBLISHED Supreme Court of Kentucky 2022-SC-0508-DG BRADLEY RACING STABLES, LLC; APPELLANTS AND WILLIAM BUFF BRADLEY ON REVIEW FROM COURT OF APPEALS V. NO. 2021-CA-0766 JEFFERSON CIRCUIT COURT NO. 19-CI-001372 JOI DENISE ROBY; BLUE CROSS
Hall v. Hallpublic domain
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2018-11-02 · Published · cited 4× · 2018 Ohio 4453
[Cite as Hall v. Hall, 2018-Ohio-4453.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT SANDUSKY COUNTY Cleadis Hall Court of Appeals No. S-18-011 Appellant Trial Court No. 16DR99 v. Shirley Hall DECISION AND JUDGMENT Appellee Deci
Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2008-09-04 · Published · cited 1× · 209 P.3d 1052; 221 Ariz. 56; 538 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 3; 2008 Ariz. App. LEXIS 141
209 P.3d 1052 (2008) EXCELL AGENT SERVICES, L.L.C.; Voltdelta Resources, Inc.; Comdisco, Inc.; Golden Enterprises, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Defendant-Appellee. No. 1 CA-TX 07-0003. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department T. September 4, 2008. Bancroft Susa & Galloway, P.C. By Michael G. Galloway, Douglas S. John,
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2023-12-20 · Published · cited 0×
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT SURGENT URANIA DOSS, Appellant, v. CHANDRA DENISE TUCKER AND LINDA TUCKER, Appellees. No. 2D22-3642 December 20, 2023 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Emily A. Peacock, Judge.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011-05-05 · Published · cited 1× · 640 F.3d 53; 65 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 1264; 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 9451; 54 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 177
POOLER, Circuit Judge. Appeal and cross-appeal from an order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Castel, J.) affirming the order of the bankruptcy court (Bernstein, C.B.J.), which denied K & L Gates LLP’s (“K & L Gates”) motion to lift two protective orders prohibiting disclosure of communications made during a mediation, and Savage & Associates, P.C.’s cross-motion t
C.B. v. Statepublic domain
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999-04-16 · Published · cited 0× · 729 So. 2d 538; 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 4994; 1999 WL 219602
VAN NORTWICK, J. C.B., a juvenile, appeals a disposition order committing him to a moderate risk facility for an indeterminate period of time based upon appellant’s admission that he violated the conditions of community control. Because the trial court erred in imposing an indeterminate sentence, we reverse and remand for resentencing. On February 27, 1997, C.B. was sentenced to community control followin
Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland) · 2023-08-03 · Published · cited 0×
Opinion filed August 3, 2023 In The Eleventh Court of Appeals __________ No. 11-22-00054-CV __________ JACY GATES, Appellant V. DENISE MCDONALD AND DIANA DOBBINS, Appellees On Appeal from the 42nd District Court Cole
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2026-01-29 · Published · cited 0×
USCA11 Case: 23-10954 Document: 42-1 Date Filed: 01/29/2026 Page: 1 of 23 FOR PUBLICATION In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-10954 ____________________ DENISE HUGHES,
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998-02-04 · Published · cited 35× · 134 F.3d 1063; 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 1789; 1998 WL 41580
HATCHETT, Chief Judge: The principal issue in this appeal is whether the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) preempts a state law *1064 fraudulent inducement claim. We affirm the district court’s ruling that the claim is preempted. BACKGROUND