Cases

OPINION OF THE COURT Thomas F. Whelan, J. It is ordered that this motion (No. 001) by the plaintiff for a default judgment on its complaint, a substitution of the plaintiff and the deletion of the unknown defendants and an order appointing a referee to compute amounts due under the terms of the note and mortgage that are the subject of this foreclosure action is considered under CPLR 3215, 1018, 1024 and

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Criminal No. 19-148-1 (CKK) v. PRAKAZREL MICHEL (1), Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION (August 30, 2024) On April 26, 2023, a jury convicted Defendant Prakazrel Michel (“Michel”

360 So.2d 1119 (1978) Thomas HENDRICKS, Appellants, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 77-1475. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. July 18, 1978. *1120 Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Elliot H. Scherker, Asst. Public Defender, for appellants. Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen. and Steven R. Jacob, A

JOHN R. BROWN, Chief Judge: This is the second time around for these parties. This in rem libel by Longshoreman-strawboss Manning against the M/V Sea Road, owned by his employer, for Yaka-Jackson 1 recovery was hea

CAMPBELL, District Judge. This is an action in equity based on the alleged infringement of patent No. 1,564,378, issued to Hyman Stein, William E. Austin, and Irving Liebowitz, for “Improvement in Bleached and Dyed Furs and the Like,” dated December 8, 1925; and patent No. 1,573,200, issued to Hyman Stein, William E. Austin, and Irving Liebowitz, for “Process for Bleaching and Dyeing Furs and the Like,” dated February 16,1926; b