Cases

Richard Dempsey sued his employer, International Paper Company, seeking to recover workers' compensation benefits. On February 19, 2002, the trial court entered an order in which it found, in pertinent part, that Dempsey had properly reported his injury to his supervisor; that Dempsey's claims were not barred by the statute of limitations; that Dempsey's injuries were compensable under the Workers' Compensation Act, § 25-5-1 et seq., Ala. Code 1975;

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-1086 JORDAN WHITAKER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MICHAEL DEMPSEY, et al., Defendants-Appellees. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-1086 JORDAN WHITAKER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MICHAEL DEMPSEY, et al., Defendants-Appellees. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 17-3184 SHAWN EAGAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MICHAEL DEMPSEY, et al., Defendants-Appellees. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the

343 So.2d 950 (1977) James L. DAVIS and H.K. Terry, Appellants, v. George C. DEMPSEY, Appellee. No. 76-1598. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District. March 22, 1977. *951 Nicholson, Howard, Brawner & Lovett, and Harry K. Bender, Miami, for appellants. Clark & Livingstone, South Miami, for appellee.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 16-0562 Filed May 3, 2017 NATHAN DOMINIC CURTIS, Applicant-Appellant, vs. STATE OF IOWA, Respondent-Appellee. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Cerro Gordo County, James M. Drew, Judge. Nathan Curtis seeks review of the district court’s dismissal of his application for postc

134 Cal.Rptr.2d 124 (2003) 108 Cal.App.4th 421 Robert Korey WOODBURY, A Minor etc., et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. Patricia BROWN-DEMPSEY, as Superintendent, etc., et al., Defendants and Appellants. No. E031001. Court of Appeal, Fourth District, Division Two. April 30, 2003. *126 Girard & Vinso

The respondent was indicted, tried and convicted for a misdemeanor, for failure to obey, observe and comply with an order of the public service commission made on the 6th day of February, 1912, and having aided and abetted a common carrier, the Brooklyn Union Elevated Company, in its failure to obey, observe and comply with said order. The crime was charged to have been committed May 19, 1915. A copy of the order made by the public service commission was attached to and made a part of the ind

Giegerich, J. The undisputed facts in the case are as follows : The. relator passed a competitive examination for the position of searcher in the respondents’ department, and when appointed on November 1, 1901, was first on the eligible list. On November 4, 1901, he entered upon the performance of his duties, and so continued until February 3, 1902, on which date he received notice from the respondents that, having been appointed

WISDOM, Circuit Judge. This is a habeas corpus proceeding under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 for relief from a state court conviction. The district judge denied the writ. We affirm. Petitioner, Charles Morris, a white man, was convicted of the rape of a fourteen year old Negro girl. The jury recommended mercy. After a

MINORA, J., Presently before the court is defendant Michael H. Roth P.C.’s motion for summary judgment. This matter arose out of an action commenced by the plaintiff to recover from the defendants damages equal to 40 percent of any future settlement or verdict recovered by defendant Osborne in a separate medical malpractice action, or in the alternative, damages equivalent to services and costs expended by the plaintiff

490 F.Supp.2d 128 (2007) Christopher W. BIBOW, Plaintiff v. AMERICAN SAW AND MANUFACTURING CO., et al, Defendants. C.A. No. 06-30136-MAP. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. June 11, 2007. Edward P. Dutkiewicz, Law Office of Edward P. Dutkiewicz, Dunedin, FL, Peter D. Prevett, Prevett & Prevett, Andover, MA, for Plaintiff. John A. Burlingame,

404 F.Supp.2d 1250 (2005) TRANSLOGIC TECHNOLOGY, INC., Plaintiff, v. HITACHI, LTD., Hitachi America, Ltd., Renesas Technology America, Inc., Defendants. No. Civ. 99-407-PA. United States District Court, D. Oregon. December 13, 2005. *1251 Jeffrey Stewart Love, Kevin M. Hayes, Klarquist Sparkman, LLP, Portland, OR, for Plaintiff.<

466 F.Supp.2d 6 (2006) AGUDAS CHASIDEI CHABAD OF UNITED STATES, Plaintiff, v. RUSSIAN FEDERATION, et al., Defendants. Civ. Action No. 05-01548 (RCL). United States District Court, District of Columbia. December 4, 2006. *7 *8 *9 William Bradford Reynolds, H

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 24-0592 Filed July 2, 2025 SHAWN MICHAEL JENKINS, Applicant-Appellant, vs. STATE OF IOWA, Respondent-Appellee. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Pottawattamie County, Kathleen A. Kilnoski, Judge. Shawn Jenkins appeals the dismissal of his application for postconviction re

661 F.Supp.2d 668 (2009) OLA, LLC v. BUILDER HOMESITE, INC., et al. Case No. 2:08-CV-324-CE. United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Marshall Division. September 29, 2009. *670 Scott Monroe Clearman, Brian Dean Walsh, The Clearman Law Firm PLLC, Edward W. Goldstein, Holly H. Barnes, Matthew Prebeg, Goldstein Faucett & Prebe

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ No. 1D16-3727 _____________________________ TAVARES RUMPH, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. _____________________________ On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County. Angela C. Dempsey, Judge. January 11, 2018 PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. ROBERTS, OSTERHAUS, and

248 F.Supp.2d 912 (2003) LG ELECTRONICS, INC., Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant v. ASUSTEK COMPUTER, INC., and USUS Computer International, Inc., Bizcom Electronics, Inc., Compal Electronics, Inc., and Sceptre Technologies, Inc., First International Computer, Inc. and First International Computer of America, Inc., Q-Lity Computer, Inc., Quanta Computer, Inc., and Quanta Computer USA, Inc., Everex Systems, Inc., Defendants and

RADER, Circuit Judge. In the instant case, a jury in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas returned a verdict finding that Taiwan Sumida Electronics, Inc. (“Taiwan Sumida”) contributed to or induced the infringement of claims 1, 2, 9, 12 and 18 of 02 Micro International, Ltd.’s (“02 Micro’s”) U.S. Patent No. 6,396,722 (“'722 patent”), that the infringement was willful, and that those claims had not been

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ No. 1D2023-0149 _____________________________ J. DOE, Appellant, v. GOVERNOR RON DESANTIS, in his official capacity as custodian of public records, and THE EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR, Appellees. _____________________________ On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County. Angela C. Demps