Cases

592 F.3d 329 (2010) T.CO METALS, LLC, Petitioner-Appellant, v. DEMPSEY PIPE & SUPPLY, INC., Respondent-Appellee. Docket Nos. 08-3894-cv(L), 08-3897-cv(CON), *330 08-4379-cv(XAP)[*]. United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Argued: June 24, 2009. Decided: January 14, 2010.

08-3894-cv T.Co M etals, LLC v. Dempsey Pipe & Supply, Inc. 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 2 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 3 4 August Term 2008 5 6 7 Argued: June 24, 2009 Decided: January 14, 2010 8 9 Docket No. 08-3894-cv(L), 08-3897-cv(CON), 08-4379-cv(XAP)* 10 11

OPINION OF THE COURT Richard M. Platkin, J. In this special proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 75, petitioner 797 Broadway Group, LLC moves to modify and confirm, as modified, a final arbitral award. Respondent BCI Construction, Inc. (BCI) opposes the application and cross-moves to, among other things, vacate the award. Background Broadway is a New York limited

OPINION AND ORDER JESSE M. FURMAN, United States District Judge In these consolidated cases, one of which was filed here and one of which was removed here from New York state court, Petitioner LGC USA Holdings (“LGC” or “Petitioner”) seeks to confirm the results of bitterly contested arbitration proceedings with its former partners in the international diamond business and related entities, Respondents Ju

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER YOUNG,1 District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Sotheby’s International Realty, Inc. (“Sotheby’s”) brings this suit against The Relocation Group, LLC (“The Relocation Group”) and its part owner, Peter Rosato (collectively, the “Defendants”), seeking vacatur of an award issued by a panel of arbitrators to The Relocation Group following a

HUGHES, J. 12This is an application for supervisory review, requesting this court to overturn a district court’s denial of the defendant/relator’s exception of prematurity, based on a contractual arbitration agreement in a suit in which the plaintiff/respondent had alleged fraudulent inducement in the contract between the parties. For the reasons that follow, we grant the defendant/relator’s application for supervisory review

OPINION & ORDER PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, District Judge: Petitioners Sea Shipping, Inc. (“Sea Shipping”), Mason Finance Corporation (“Mason”), and Ocean Shipping, Inc. (“Ocean Shipping”) (together, “Petitioners”) filed this petition to confirm an arbitration award pursuant to § 9 of the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. § 9 (“FAA” or the “Act”). Respondent Half Moon Shipping, LLC (“Half Moon”) has

21-724-cv Smarter Tools Inc. v. Chongqing Senci Import & Export Trade Co., Ltd. 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 2 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 3 ____________________ 4 5 August Term, 2021 6 7 (Submitted: April 26, 2022 Decided: January 17, 2023) 8 9 Docket No. 21-724 10 11 _____

362 S.W.3d 160 (2012) DAIMLERCHRYSLER MOTORS COMPANY, LLC, Appellant and Appellee, v. Tommy J. MANUEL, Tommy Manuel Auto Leasing, Inc., and Manuel Auto Sales, Ltd., Appellees and Appellants. No. 02-07-00299-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Fort Worth. February 24, 2012. *165 Richard H. Gateley, Brackett & Ellis, P.C., Fort Wort

COURTNEY HUDSON HENRY, Justice. hMay Construction Company (“May”) appeals from a Washington County Circuit Court order declaring a hen on real property, owned by Town Creek Construction & Development, LLC (“Town Creek”), subordinate to a mortgage filed by Chambers Bank of North Arkansas (“Chambers”) and unenforceable against a lien bond issued by Ohio Casualty Insurance Company (“Ohio

LAURIE SELBER SILVERSTEIN, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE Before the Court is Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Complaint on Jurisdictional Grounds2 through which Defendants seek *639to dismiss or stay this adversary proceeding on multiple grounds, some at least nominally jurisdictional, most not. Plaintiffs and Defend

Matter of Steyn v CRTV, LLC (2019 NY Slip Op 05341) Matter of Steyn v CRTV, LLC 2019 NY Slip Op 05341 Decided on July 2, 2019 Appellate Division, First Department Renwick, J. Publis

Matter of Anderson v AHS (At Home Solutions, LLC) (2021 NY Slip Op 06917) Matter of Anderson v AHS (At Home Solutions, LLC) 2021 NY Slip Op 06917 Decided on December 09, 2021 Appellate Division, First Department Publish

Matter of Anderson v AHS (At Home Solutions, LLC) (2021 NY Slip Op 06917) Matter of Anderson v AHS (At Home Solutions, LLC) 2021 NY Slip Op 06917 Decided on December 09, 2021 Appellate Division, First Department Publish

NAOMI REICE BUCHWALD, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE *472Petitioner Salus Capital Partners, LLC ("Salus" or "petitioner") initiated this action in New York State Supreme Court by filing a petition to confirm an April 2017 arbitration award granted in its favor. Respondent Andrew Moser ("Moser" or "respondent") timely removed the action to this Co

18-2362 Weiss v. Sallie Mae, Inc. In the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit August Term, 2018 Argued: May 16, 2019 Decided: September 12, 2019 Docket No. 18

2022 WI App 14 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2019AP2205 Complete Title of Case: LOREN IMHOFF HOMEBUILDER, INC., PETITIONER-APPELLANT, V. LISA TAYLOR AND LUIS CUEVAS, RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS. Opinion Filed: March 31, 2022 Submitted

OPINION SWEET, District Judge. Petitioners Rame, LLC d/b/a Cafe Centro and Patina Restaurant Group (collectively, the “Petitioners”) have filed a petition to (1) vacate arbitrator Bonnie Weinstock’s (the “Arbitrator”) Partial Final Award on Clause Construction, dated February 6, 2012 (the “Award”), pursuant to 9 U.S.C. § 10, and (2) remand the matter to the Arbitrator, directing her to proceed with e

DEBORAH A. BATTS, United States District Judge. On July 20, 2017, Plaintiff Ashlynn Alexander filed a Complaint against Defendants Possible Productions Inc. ("Possible"), Showtime Pictures Development Company ("Showtime"), and Travis Rehwaldt, asserting claims for sex discrimination under the New York City Human Rights Law ("NYCHRL") (Count 3) and for retaliation under Title VII (Count 1), the New York State Human Rights Law ("NYSHR

OPINION AND ORDER RAMOS, District Judge. The instant dispute concerns the validity of an arbitration clause in a litigation financing agreement. Respondent Steven Spangler (“Spangler” or “Respondent Spangler”) sought funding for a medical malpractice action in Indiana (the “Skyl-eign Spangler Litigation”) after his daughter, Skyleign Spangler, was delivered stillborn in 2003. To that end, Span-