Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Deloris Cole”
Johnny J. E. Meadows v. A. M. (Slim) Gabrel, John H. Green, Tom Barker and Deloris Ann (Meadows) Holmeslypublic domain
RONEY, Circuit Judge. The plaintiff in this Section 1983 case is the same Johnny J. E. Meadows who brought the action in Meadows v. Evans, 550 F.2d 345 (5th Cir. 1977) (en banc). Although the Section 1983 claims in this case bear a striking resemblance to those in the Evans case, the defend
Herrington v. Gauldenpublic domain
Blackwell, Justice. Deloris Gaulden experienced cardiac arrest, and she died in the emergency department of Liberty Regional Medical Center. Her daughter sued Bobby L. Herrington, M.D., the medical director of the emergency department, alleging that Gaulden could have been saved, if only her treating physician and nurse had promptly and properly implemented a chest pain protocol that the hospital had adopted.1<
Poe v. Gauncepublic domain
OPINION MOORE, Judge: The heirs of Roy Eugene Gaunce (the above-captioned appellees) and the heirs of Charles Gates (the above-captioned appellants) each sought declarations of their rights from the Nicholas Circuit Court re*771garding ownership of two burial sites and a monument located on a family cemetery plot in Nicholas County, Kent
Marriage of Ashlock v. Ashlockpublic domain
KENNETH W. SHRUM, Judge. Deloris Ashlock (“Wife”) appeals a judgment that denied her request for temporary maintenance. Wife alleges the trial court erred when it denied her motion because the court “erroneously required Wife to consume her marital property before finding she is entitled to maintenance.” We disagree. We affirm. STANDARD OF REVIEW A judgment that awards or denies temporary
Kastning v. State Farm Insurance Companiespublic domain
OPINION HOOTEN, Judge. Appellants challenge the district court’s summary-judgment dismissal of their claim for uninsured motorist coverage under a policy issued by respondent, arguing that the farm tractor with which they collided was an uninsured “motor vehicle” within the meaning of their policy and, alternatively, that they are entitled to coverage under the reasonable-expectations doctrine. We affirm.
Robinson v. Millspublic domain
592 F.3d 730 (2010) David L. ROBINSON, Petitioner-Appellee, v. David MILLS, Warden, Respondent-Appellant. No. 09-5243. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Argued: October 8, 2009. Decided and Filed: January 28, 2010. *731 ARGUED: John H. Bledsoe, Office of the Attorney General, Nashville, Tennessee, fo
Gaulden v. Greenpublic domain
BARNES, Presiding Judge. Following the death of Deloris P. Gaulden in the emergency room of Liberty Regional Medical Center (“LRMC”), her daughter, individually and as administratrix of her estate, brought this wrongful death and survival action against several defendants, including Bobby L. Herrington, M.D., the Medical Director of the LRMC Emergency Department.1 The trial court granted summary
Hardy ex rel. Estate of Carter v. Hardinpublic domain
Murdock, Justice. Emma Carter Hardy (“Hardy”), acting on behalf of the estate of Julius Carter, Sr., deceased, appeals from a final order entered by the Montgomery Circuit Court against her and in favor of Julius L. Hardin (“Hardin”) in a will contest. Hardy is the daughter of Julius Carter, Sr. (“Carter”); Hardin is the son of Thelma Carter Malone, who is also a daughter of Carter’s. Carter died on Decem
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dickinsonpublic domain
29 S.W.3d 796 (2000) WAL-MART STORES, INC., Appellant, v. Benjamin L. DICKINSON, Judge, Barren Circuit Court, Appellee, and Deloris Laurenz, Real Party in Interest. No. 1999-SC-0758-MR. Supreme Court of Kentucky. September 28, 2000. *798 Richard H.C. Clay, Christopher R. Cashen, Woodward, Hobson & Fulton, L.L.P., Lexingto
David Robinson v. David Millspublic domain
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 File Name: 10a0014p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT _________________ X - DAVID L. ROBINSON,
137 Nev., Advance Opinion 4, IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA TEVA PARENTERAL MEDICINES, No. 81024 INC., F/K/A SICOR, INC.; BAXTER HEALTHCARE CORPORATION; AND MCKESSON MEDICAL-SURGICAL, INC., Petitioners, FILED vs. THE EIGHT
Pierce v. Statepublic domain
860 So.2d 855 (2003) Steven Paul PIERCE, Appellant, v. STATE of Mississippi, Appellee. No. 2002-KA-00862-COA. Court of Appeals of Mississippi. December 9, 2003. *858 William Joseph Barnett, Jackson, attorney for appellant. Office of the Attorney General by Jean Smith Vaughan, attorney for appellee. Before SOUTHWICK,
RYAN, J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which COLE, J., joined. GILMAN, J. (pp. 490-92), delivered a separate opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part. OPINION RYAN, Circuit Judge. The defendants, Dalton Brown and Yvonne Meadows, were convicted by a jury on multiple counts, described in detail below, all arising out of alleged corruption in the Detroit Housing Departmen
State v. Gremillionpublic domain
428 So.2d 940 (1983) STATE of Louisiana v. Gary GREMILLION. STATE of Louisiana v. Donald GREMILLION. Nos. 82 KA 0695, 82 KA 0702. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit. February 22, 1983. *941 Ossie Brown, Dist. Atty., by Ralph L. Roy, Asst. Dist. Atty., Baton Rouge, for plaintiff-appellee. Leon D. Jackso
Nunley v. Statepublic domain
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 1054 [1] OPINION [2] Paul Handy Nunley was tried for the crime of Murder in the First Degree, in violation of 21 O.S. 1981 § 701.7[21-701.7], in Case No. CRF-79-2282, in the District Court of Oklahoma County before the Honorable Jack R. Parr. The appellant was
Taitt v. Islamic Republic of Iranpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA SEAN TAITT, et al., : : Plaintiffs, : Civil Action No.: 20-1557 (RC) : v. : Re Document No.: 19 :
Alford v. Kimberly-Clark Tissue Co.public domain
14 F.Supp.2d 1290 (1998) Elaine ALFORD, et al., Plaintiffs, v. KIMBERLY-CLARK TISSUE COMPANY,[1] Defendant. No. CIV. A. 95-0259-RV-M. United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Southern Division. July 9, 1998. *1291 Richard A. Meelheim, Christa Meelheim, Birmingham, AL, James P. Rea, Birmingham, AL, for Plaintiffs.
State Bank of Burden v. Augusta State Bankpublic domain
207 Kan. 116 (1971) 483 P.2d 1068 STATE BANK OF BURDEN, Appellant, v. AUGUSTA STATE BANK and PAUL MANN, Appellees. No. 45,938 Supreme Court of Kansas. Opinion filed April 10, 1971. Stan E. Wisdom, of Jochems, Sargent and Blaes, of Wichita, argued the cause, and Grant H. Cole, of Cole and Camp, of Winfield, was with him on the br
Williams v. Esawpublic domain
214 Kan. 658 (1974) 522 P.2d 950 DWAYNE WILLIAMS and DELORIS CRIST, Appellants, v. GLENN ESAW and SAN ORE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., Appellees. No. 47,228 Supreme Court of Kansas. Opinion filed May 11, 1974. Gerald W. Scott, of Blair, Matlack, Rogg, Foote & Scott, P.A., of Wichita, argued the cause and was on the brief for the app
Citizens Committee for the D.C. Video Lottery Terminal Initiative v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & Ethicspublic domain
FARRELL, Associate Judge: Petitioner, the Citizens Committee for the District of Columbia Video Lottery Terminal Initiative (the Citizens Committee), challenges a decision of the District of Columbia Board of Elections and Ethics (the Board) rejecting proposed Initiative Measure No. 68, entitled “The District of Columbia Video Lottery Terminal Initiative of 2004,” on the ground that irregularities in the petition circulation